问题:了解dict.copy()-浅还是深?

在阅读的文档时dict.copy(),它说它制作了该词典的浅表副本。我关注的书(Beazley的Python参考)也是如此,该书说:

m.copy()方法对映射对象中包含的项目进行浅表复制,并将其放置在新的映射对象中。

考虑一下:

>>> original = dict(a=1, b=2)
>>> new = original.copy()
>>> new.update({'c': 3})
>>> original
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
>>> new
{'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 2}

因此,我认为这也将更新original(并添加’c’:3)的值,因为我正在执行浅表复制。就像您对列表进行操作一样:

>>> original = [1, 2, 3]
>>> new = original
>>> new.append(4)
>>> new, original
([1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 4])

这按预期工作。

由于两者都是浅表副本,为什么为什么dict.copy()按我的预期无法正常工作?还是我对浅复制和深复制的理解存在缺陷?

While reading up the documentation for dict.copy(), it says that it makes a shallow copy of the dictionary. Same goes for the book I am following (Beazley’s Python Reference), which says:

The m.copy() method makes a shallow copy of the items contained in a mapping object and places them in a new mapping object.

Consider this:

>>> original = dict(a=1, b=2)
>>> new = original.copy()
>>> new.update({'c': 3})
>>> original
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
>>> new
{'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 2}

So I assumed this would update the value of original (and add ‘c’: 3) also since I was doing a shallow copy. Like if you do it for a list:

>>> original = [1, 2, 3]
>>> new = original
>>> new.append(4)
>>> new, original
([1, 2, 3, 4], [1, 2, 3, 4])

This works as expected.

Since both are shallow copies, why is that the dict.copy() doesn’t work as I expect it to? Or my understanding of shallow vs deep copying is flawed?


回答 0

“浅复制”表示字典的内容不是按值复制,而只是创建一个新引用。

>>> a = {1: [1,2,3]}
>>> b = a.copy()
>>> a, b
({1: [1, 2, 3]}, {1: [1, 2, 3]})
>>> a[1].append(4)
>>> a, b
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})

相反,深层副本将按值复制所有内容。

>>> import copy
>>> c = copy.deepcopy(a)
>>> a, c
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})
>>> a[1].append(5)
>>> a, c
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})

所以:

  1. b = a:参考分配,制造ab指向同一对象。

    'a = b'的图示:'a'和'b'都指向'{1:L}','L'指向'[1、2、3]。

  2. b = a.copy():浅拷贝,a并且b将成为两个独立的对象,但其内容仍共享相同的参考

    'b = a.copy()'的说明:'a'指向'{1:L}','b'指向'{1:M}','L'和'M'都指向'[ 1,2,3]”。

  3. b = copy.deepcopy(a):深度复制,a并且b的结构和内容变得完全孤立。

    'b = copy.deepcopy(a)'的图示:'a'指向'{1:L}','L'指向'[1、2、3]';  'b'指向'{1:M}','M'指向'[1,2,3]'的另一个实例。

By “shallow copying” it means the content of the dictionary is not copied by value, but just creating a new reference.

>>> a = {1: [1,2,3]}
>>> b = a.copy()
>>> a, b
({1: [1, 2, 3]}, {1: [1, 2, 3]})
>>> a[1].append(4)
>>> a, b
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})

In contrast, a deep copy will copy all contents by value.

>>> import copy
>>> c = copy.deepcopy(a)
>>> a, c
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})
>>> a[1].append(5)
>>> a, c
({1: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]}, {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]})

So:

  1. b = a: Reference assignment, Make a and b points to the same object.

    Illustration of 'a = b': 'a' and 'b' both point to '{1: L}', 'L' points to '[1, 2, 3]'.

  2. b = a.copy(): Shallow copying, a and b will become two isolated objects, but their contents still share the same reference

    Illustration of 'b = a.copy()': 'a' points to '{1: L}', 'b' points to '{1: M}', 'L' and 'M' both point to '[1, 2, 3]'.

  3. b = copy.deepcopy(a): Deep copying, a and b‘s structure and content become completely isolated.

    Illustration of 'b = copy.deepcopy(a)': 'a' points to '{1: L}', 'L' points to '[1, 2, 3]'; 'b' points to '{1: M}', 'M' points to a different instance of '[1, 2, 3]'.


回答 1

这不是深拷贝或浅拷贝的问题,您要做的只是深拷贝。

这里:

>>> new = original 

您正在创建对原始引用的列表/字典的新引用。

而在这里:

>>> new = original.copy()
>>> # or
>>> new = list(original) # dict(original)

您正在创建一个新的列表/字典,其中填充了原始容器中包含的对象引用的副本。

It’s not a matter of deep copy or shallow copy, none of what you’re doing is deep copy.

Here:

>>> new = original 

you’re creating a new reference to the the list/dict referenced by original.

while here:

>>> new = original.copy()
>>> # or
>>> new = list(original) # dict(original)

you’re creating a new list/dict which is filled with a copy of the references of objects contained in the original container.


回答 2

举个例子:

original = dict(a=1, b=2, c=dict(d=4, e=5))
new = original.copy()

现在,让我们在“浅”(第一)级别中更改一个值:

new['a'] = 10
# new = {'a': 10, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 4, 'e': 5}}
# original = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 4, 'e': 5}}
# no change in original, since ['a'] is an immutable integer

现在让我们将值更深一级地更改:

new['c']['d'] = 40
# new = {'a': 10, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 40, 'e': 5}}
# original = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 40, 'e': 5}}
# new['c'] points to the same original['d'] mutable dictionary, so it will be changed

Take this example:

original = dict(a=1, b=2, c=dict(d=4, e=5))
new = original.copy()

Now let’s change a value in the ‘shallow’ (first) level:

new['a'] = 10
# new = {'a': 10, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 4, 'e': 5}}
# original = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 4, 'e': 5}}
# no change in original, since ['a'] is an immutable integer

Now let’s change a value one level deeper:

new['c']['d'] = 40
# new = {'a': 10, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 40, 'e': 5}}
# original = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': {'d': 40, 'e': 5}}
# new['c'] points to the same original['d'] mutable dictionary, so it will be changed

回答 3

添加到肯尼的答案。当您进行浅表复制parent.copy()时,会使用相同的键创建一个新字典,但不会复制它们的值。如果将新值添加到parent_copy,则不会影响父对象,因为parent_copy是新字典没有参考。

parent = {1: [1,2,3]}
parent_copy = parent.copy()
parent_reference = parent

print id(parent),id(parent_copy),id(parent_reference)
#140690938288400 140690938290536 140690938288400

print id(parent[1]),id(parent_copy[1]),id(parent_reference[1])
#140690938137128 140690938137128 140690938137128

parent_copy[1].append(4)
parent_copy[2] = ['new']

print parent, parent_copy, parent_reference
#{1: [1, 2, 3, 4]} {1: [1, 2, 3, 4], 2: ['new']} {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}

parent [1]parent_copy [1]的hash(id)值相同,这意味着存储在id 140690938288400中的parent [1]parent_copy [1]的 [1,2,3] 。

但是parentparent_copy的哈希值不同,这意味着它们是不同的字典,并且parent_copy是一个新字典,其值引用了parent的

Adding to kennytm’s answer. When you do a shallow copy parent.copy() a new dictionary is created with same keys,but the values are not copied they are referenced.If you add a new value to parent_copy it won’t effect parent because parent_copy is a new dictionary not reference.

parent = {1: [1,2,3]}
parent_copy = parent.copy()
parent_reference = parent

print id(parent),id(parent_copy),id(parent_reference)
#140690938288400 140690938290536 140690938288400

print id(parent[1]),id(parent_copy[1]),id(parent_reference[1])
#140690938137128 140690938137128 140690938137128

parent_copy[1].append(4)
parent_copy[2] = ['new']

print parent, parent_copy, parent_reference
#{1: [1, 2, 3, 4]} {1: [1, 2, 3, 4], 2: ['new']} {1: [1, 2, 3, 4]}

The hash(id) value of parent[1], parent_copy[1] are identical which implies [1,2,3] of parent[1] and parent_copy[1] stored at id 140690938288400.

But hash of parent and parent_copy are different which implies They are different dictionaries and parent_copy is a new dictionary having values reference to values of parent


回答 4

“ new”和“ original”是不同的dict,这就是为什么您只能更新其中之一。.这些项目是浅复制的,而不是dict本身。

“new” and “original” are different dicts, that’s why you can update just one of them.. The items are shallow-copied, not the dict itself.


回答 5

内容是浅复制的。

所以,如果原来的dict包含list或另一个dictionary,在原或其浅拷贝修改一个他们将修改他们(listdict)在其他。

Contents are shallow copied.

So if the original dict contains a list or another dictionary, modifying one them in the original or its shallow copy will modify them (the list or the dict) in the other.


回答 6

在第二部分中,您应该使用 new = original.copy()

.copy=是不同的东西。

In your second part, you should use new = original.copy()

.copy and = are different things.


声明:本站所有文章,如无特殊说明或标注,均为本站原创发布。任何个人或组织,在未征得本站同意时,禁止复制、盗用、采集、发布本站内容到任何网站、书籍等各类媒体平台。如若本站内容侵犯了原著者的合法权益,可联系我们进行处理。