在Python中进行逆字典查找

Question 1

Is there any straightforward way of finding a key by knowing the value within a dictionary?

All I can think of is this:

key = [key for key, value in dict_obj.items() if value == 'value'][0]

Question 2

There is none. Don’t forget that the value may be found on any number of keys, including 0 or more than 1.

Question 3

Your list comprehension goes through all the dict’s items finding all the matches, then just returns the first key. This generator expression will only iterate as far as necessary to return the first value:

key = next(key for key, value in dd.items() if value == 'value')

where dd is the dict. Will raise StopIteration if no match is found, so you might want to catch that and return a more appropriate exception like ValueError or KeyError.

Question 4

There are cases where a dictionary is a one:one mapping

Eg,

d = {1: "one", 2: "two" ...}

Your approach is ok if you are only doing a single lookup. However if you need to do more than one lookup it will be more efficient to create an inverse dictionary

ivd = {v: k for k, v in d.items()}

If there is a possibility of multiple keys with the same value, you will need to specify the desired behaviour in this case.

If your Python is 2.6 or older, you can use

ivd = dict((v, k) for k, v in d.items())

Question 5

This version is 26% shorter than yours but functions identically, even for redundant/ambiguous values (returns the first match, as yours does). However, it is probably twice as slow as yours, because it creates a list from the dict twice.

key = dict_obj.keys()[dict_obj.values().index(value)]

Or if you prefer brevity over readability you can save one more character with

key = list(dict_obj)[dict_obj.values().index(value)]

And if you prefer efficiency, @PaulMcGuire’s approach is better. If there are lots of keys that share the same value it’s more efficient not to instantiate that list of keys with a list comprehension and instead use use a generator:

key = (key for key, value in dict_obj.items() if value == 'value').next()

Question 6

Since this is still very relevant, the first Google hit and I just spend some time figuring this out, I’ll post my (working in Python 3) solution:

testdict = {'one'   : '1',
            'two'   : '2',
            'three' : '3',
            'four'  : '4'
            }

value = '2'

[key for key in testdict.items() if key[1] == value][0][0]

Out[1]: 'two'

It will give you the first value that matches.

Question 7

Maybe a dictionary-like class such as DoubleDict down below is what you want? You can use any one of the provided metaclasses in conjuction with DoubleDict or may avoid using any metaclass at all.

import functools
import threading

################################################################################

class _DDChecker(type):

    def __new__(cls, name, bases, classdict):
        for key, value in classdict.items():
            if key not in {'__new__', '__slots__', '_DoubleDict__dict_view'}:
                classdict[key] = cls._wrap(value)
        return super().__new__(cls, name, bases, classdict)

    @staticmethod
    def _wrap(function):
        @functools.wraps(function)
        def check(self, *args, **kwargs):
            value = function(self, *args, **kwargs)
            if self._DoubleDict__forward != \
               dict(map(reversed, self._DoubleDict__reverse.items())):
                raise RuntimeError('Forward & Reverse are not equivalent!')
            return value
        return check

################################################################################

class _DDAtomic(_DDChecker):

    def __new__(cls, name, bases, classdict):
        if not bases:
            classdict['__slots__'] += ('_DDAtomic__mutex',)
            classdict['__new__'] = cls._atomic_new
        return super().__new__(cls, name, bases, classdict)

    @staticmethod
    def _atomic_new(cls, iterable=(), **pairs):
        instance = object.__new__(cls, iterable, **pairs)
        instance.__mutex = threading.RLock()
        instance.clear()
        return instance

    @staticmethod
    def _wrap(function):
        @functools.wraps(function)
        def atomic(self, *args, **kwargs):
            with self.__mutex:
                return function(self, *args, **kwargs)
        return atomic

################################################################################

class _DDAtomicChecker(_DDAtomic):

    @staticmethod
    def _wrap(function):
        return _DDAtomic._wrap(_DDChecker._wrap(function))

################################################################################

class DoubleDict(metaclass=_DDAtomicChecker):

    __slots__ = '__forward', '__reverse'

    def __new__(cls, iterable=(), **pairs):
        instance = super().__new__(cls, iterable, **pairs)
        instance.clear()
        return instance

    def __init__(self, iterable=(), **pairs):
        self.update(iterable, **pairs)

    ########################################################################

    def __repr__(self):
        return repr(self.__forward)

    def __lt__(self, other):
        return self.__forward < other

    def __le__(self, other):
        return self.__forward <= other

    def __eq__(self, other):
        return self.__forward == other

    def __ne__(self, other):
        return self.__forward != other

    def __gt__(self, other):
        return self.__forward > other

    def __ge__(self, other):
        return self.__forward >= other

    def __len__(self):
        return len(self.__forward)

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        if key in self:
            return self.__forward[key]
        return self.__missing_key(key)

    def __setitem__(self, key, value):
        if self.in_values(value):
            del self[self.get_key(value)]
        self.__set_key_value(key, value)
        return value

    def __delitem__(self, key):
        self.pop(key)

    def __iter__(self):
        return iter(self.__forward)

    def __contains__(self, key):
        return key in self.__forward

    ########################################################################

    def clear(self):
        self.__forward = {}
        self.__reverse = {}

    def copy(self):
        return self.__class__(self.items())

    def del_value(self, value):
        self.pop_key(value)

    def get(self, key, default=None):
        return self[key] if key in self else default

    def get_key(self, value):
        if self.in_values(value):
            return self.__reverse[value]
        return self.__missing_value(value)

    def get_key_default(self, value, default=None):
        return self.get_key(value) if self.in_values(value) else default

    def in_values(self, value):
        return value in self.__reverse

    def items(self):
        return self.__dict_view('items', ((key, self[key]) for key in self))

    def iter_values(self):
        return iter(self.__reverse)

    def keys(self):
        return self.__dict_view('keys', self.__forward)

    def pop(self, key, *default):
        if len(default) > 1:
            raise TypeError('too many arguments')
        if key in self:
            value = self[key]
            self.__del_key_value(key, value)
            return value
        if default:
            return default[0]
        raise KeyError(key)

    def pop_key(self, value, *default):
        if len(default) > 1:
            raise TypeError('too many arguments')
        if self.in_values(value):
            key = self.get_key(value)
            self.__del_key_value(key, value)
            return key
        if default:
            return default[0]
        raise KeyError(value)

    def popitem(self):
        try:
            key = next(iter(self))
        except StopIteration:
            raise KeyError('popitem(): dictionary is empty')
        return key, self.pop(key)

    def set_key(self, value, key):
        if key in self:
            self.del_value(self[key])
        self.__set_key_value(key, value)
        return key

    def setdefault(self, key, default=None):
        if key not in self:
            self[key] = default
        return self[key]

    def setdefault_key(self, value, default=None):
        if not self.in_values(value):
            self.set_key(value, default)
        return self.get_key(value)

    def update(self, iterable=(), **pairs):
        for key, value in (((key, iterable[key]) for key in iterable.keys())
                           if hasattr(iterable, 'keys') else iterable):
            self[key] = value
        for key, value in pairs.items():
            self[key] = value

    def values(self):
        return self.__dict_view('values', self.__reverse)

    ########################################################################

    def __missing_key(self, key):
        if hasattr(self.__class__, '__missing__'):
            return self.__missing__(key)
        if not hasattr(self, 'default_factory') \
           or self.default_factory is None:
            raise KeyError(key)
        return self.__setitem__(key, self.default_factory())

    def __missing_value(self, value):
        if hasattr(self.__class__, '__missing_value__'):
            return self.__missing_value__(value)
        if not hasattr(self, 'default_key_factory') \
           or self.default_key_factory is None:
            raise KeyError(value)
        return self.set_key(value, self.default_key_factory())

    def __set_key_value(self, key, value):
        self.__forward[key] = value
        self.__reverse[value] = key

    def __del_key_value(self, key, value):
        del self.__forward[key]
        del self.__reverse[value]

    ########################################################################

    class __dict_view(frozenset):

        __slots__ = '__name'

        def __new__(cls, name, iterable=()):
            instance = super().__new__(cls, iterable)
            instance.__name = name
            return instance

        def __repr__(self):
            return 'dict_{}({})'.format(self.__name, list(self))

Question 8

No, you can not do this efficiently without looking in all the keys and checking all their values. So you will need O(n) time to do this. If you need to do a lot of such lookups you will need to do this efficiently by constructing a reversed dictionary (can be done also in O(n)) and then making a search inside of this reversed dictionary (each search will take on average O(1)).

Here is an example of how to construct a reversed dictionary (which will be able to do one to many mapping) from a normal dictionary:

for i in h_normal:
    for j in h_normal[i]:
        if j not in h_reversed:
            h_reversed[j] = set([i])
        else:
            h_reversed[j].add(i)

For example if your

h_normal = {
  1: set([3]), 
  2: set([5, 7]), 
  3: set([]), 
  4: set([7]), 
  5: set([1, 4]), 
  6: set([1, 7]), 
  7: set([1]), 
  8: set([2, 5, 6])
}

your h_reversed will be

{
  1: set([5, 6, 7]),
  2: set([8]), 
  3: set([1]), 
  4: set([5]), 
  5: set([8, 2]), 
  6: set([8]), 
  7: set([2, 4, 6])
}

Question 9

There isn’t one as far as I know of, one way however to do it is to create a dict for normal lookup by key and another dict for reverse lookup by value.

There’s an example of such an implementation here:

http://code.activestate.com/recipes/415903-two-dict-classes-which-can-lookup-keys-by-value-an/

This does mean that looking up the keys for a value could result in multiple results which can be returned as a simple list.

Question 10

I know this might be considered ‘wasteful’, but in this scenario I often store the key as an additional column in the value record:

d = {'key1' : ('key1', val, val...), 'key2' : ('key2', val, val...) }

it’s a tradeoff and feels wrong, but it’s simple and works and of course depends on values being tuples rather than simple values.

Question 11

Make a reverse dictionary

reverse_dictionary = {v:k for k,v in dictionary.items()}

If you have a lot of reverse lookups to do

Question 12

Through values in dictionary can be object of any kind they can’t be hashed or indexed other way. So finding key by the value is unnatural for this collection type. Any query like that can be executed in O(n) time only. So if this is frequent task you should take a look for some indexing of key like Jon sujjested or maybe even some spatial index (DB or http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Rtree/ ).

Question 13

I’m using dictionaries as a sort of “database”, so I need to find a key that I can reuse. For my case, if a key’s value is None, then I can take it and reuse it without having to “allocate” another id. Just figured I’d share it.

db = {0:[], 1:[], ..., 5:None, 11:None, 19:[], ...}

keys_to_reallocate = [None]
allocate.extend(i for i in db.iterkeys() if db[i] is None)
free_id = keys_to_reallocate[-1]

I like this one because I don’t have to try and catch any errors such as StopIteration or IndexError. If there’s a key available, then free_id will contain one. If there isn’t, then it will simply be None. Probably not pythonic, but I really didn’t want to use a try here…

在Python中进行逆字典查找

问题：在Python中进行逆字典查找

回答 0

回答 1

回答 2

回答 3

回答 4

回答 5

回答 6

回答 7

回答 8

回答 9

制作反向字典

Make a reverse dictionary

回答 10

回答 11

排行榜展示

Python 情人节超强技能导出微信聊天记录生成词云

你不得不知道的python超级文献批量搜索下载工具

Python 流程图 — 一键转化代码为流程图

7行代码 Python热力图可视化分析缺失数据处理

Python 优化—算出每条语句执行时间

你的10W块放哪里能赚最多钱？

文章展示

Python Flask有意的空响应

Python中旧样式类与新样式类有什么区别？

Django Rest Framework-未提供身份验证凭据

Python中的相对路径

如何知道点子本身的版本

如何包括外部Python代码以在其他文件中使用？

在Python中进行逆字典查找

问题：在Python中进行逆字典查找

回答 0

回答 1

回答 2

回答 3

回答 4

回答 5

回答 6

回答 7

回答 8

回答 9

制作反向字典

Make a reverse dictionary

回答 10

回答 11

相关文章

排行榜展示

文章展示