问题:如何模拟with语句中使用的打开(使用Python中的Mock框架)?
如何使用模拟测试以下代码(使用模拟,Michael Foord的Mock框架提供的补丁装饰器和哨兵):
def testme(filepath):
with open(filepath, 'r') as f:
return f.read()
How do I test the following code with unittest.mock
:
def testme(filepath):
with open(filepath) as f:
return f.read()
回答 0
模拟0.7.0中的更改方式已更改,该模拟最终支持模拟python协议方法(魔术方法),尤其是使用MagicMock:
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/magicmock.html
作为上下文管理器打开模拟的示例(来自模拟文档中的示例页面):
>>> open_name = '%s.open' % __name__
>>> with patch(open_name, create=True) as mock_open:
... mock_open.return_value = MagicMock(spec=file)
...
... with open('/some/path', 'w') as f:
... f.write('something')
...
<mock.Mock object at 0x...>
>>> file_handle = mock_open.return_value.__enter__.return_value
>>> file_handle.write.assert_called_with('something')
The way to do this has changed in mock 0.7.0 which finally supports mocking the python protocol methods (magic methods), particularly using the MagicMock:
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/magicmock.html
An example of mocking open as a context manager (from the examples page in the mock documentation):
>>> open_name = '%s.open' % __name__
>>> with patch(open_name, create=True) as mock_open:
... mock_open.return_value = MagicMock(spec=file)
...
... with open('/some/path', 'w') as f:
... f.write('something')
...
<mock.Mock object at 0x...>
>>> file_handle = mock_open.return_value.__enter__.return_value
>>> file_handle.write.assert_called_with('something')
回答 1
mock_open
是mock
框架的一部分,使用非常简单。patch
用作上下文返回用于替换已修补对象的对象:您可以使用它使测试更简单。
Python 3.x
使用builtins
代替__builtin__
。
from unittest.mock import patch, mock_open
with patch("builtins.open", mock_open(read_data="data")) as mock_file:
assert open("path/to/open").read() == "data"
mock_file.assert_called_with("path/to/open")
Python 2.7
mock
不属于unittest
您,您应该修补__builtin__
from mock import patch, mock_open
with patch("__builtin__.open", mock_open(read_data="data")) as mock_file:
assert open("path/to/open").read() == "data"
mock_file.assert_called_with("path/to/open")
装饰箱
如果将的结果用作的patch
修饰符用作装饰器mock_open()
,则new
patch
可能会有些奇怪。
在这种情况下,最好使用new_callable
patch
的参数并要记住,每个patch
不使用的额外参数都会按照文档中的new_callable
描述传递给函数。patch
patch()使用任意关键字参数。这些将在构造时传递给Mock(或new_callable)。
例如,Python 3.x的修饰版本为:
@patch("builtins.open", new_callable=mock_open, read_data="data")
def test_patch(mock_file):
assert open("path/to/open").read() == "data"
mock_file.assert_called_with("path/to/open")
请记住,在这种情况下,patch
会将模拟对象添加为测试函数的参数。
Python 3
Patch builtins.open
and use mock_open
, which is part of the mock
framework. patch
used as a context manager returns the object used to replace the patched one:
from unittest.mock import patch, mock_open
with patch("builtins.open", mock_open(read_data="data")) as mock_file:
assert open("path/to/open").read() == "data"
mock_file.assert_called_with("path/to/open")
If you want to use patch
as a decorator, using mock_open()
‘s result as the new=
argument to patch
can be a little bit weird. Instead, use patch
‘s new_callable=
argument and remember that every extra argument that patch
doesn’t use will be passed to the new_callable
function, as described in the patch
documentation:
patch()
takes arbitrary keyword arguments. These will be passed to the Mock
(or new_callable) on construction.
@patch("builtins.open", new_callable=mock_open, read_data="data")
def test_patch(mock_file):
assert open("path/to/open").read() == "data"
mock_file.assert_called_with("path/to/open")
Remember that in this case patch
will pass the mocked object as an argument to your test function.
Python 2
You need to patch __builtin__.open
instead of builtins.open
and mock
is not part of unittest
, you need to pip install
and import it separately:
from mock import patch, mock_open
with patch("__builtin__.open", mock_open(read_data="data")) as mock_file:
assert open("path/to/open").read() == "data"
mock_file.assert_called_with("path/to/open")
回答 2
使用最新版本的模拟,您可以使用真正有用的模拟_打开帮助器:
mock_open(模拟=无,读取数据=无)
一个辅助函数创建一个模拟来代替open的使用。它适用于直接调用或用作上下文管理器的open。
模拟参数是要配置的模拟对象。如果没有(默认),则将为您创建一个MagicMock,其API限于标准文件句柄上可用的方法或属性。
read_data是用于返回文件句柄的read方法的字符串。默认情况下,这是一个空字符串。
>>> from mock import mock_open, patch
>>> m = mock_open()
>>> with patch('{}.open'.format(__name__), m, create=True):
... with open('foo', 'w') as h:
... h.write('some stuff')
>>> m.assert_called_once_with('foo', 'w')
>>> handle = m()
>>> handle.write.assert_called_once_with('some stuff')
With the latest versions of mock, you can use the really useful mock_open helper:
mock_open(mock=None, read_data=None)
A helper function to create a mock to replace the use of open. It works for open called directly or used as a context manager.
The mock argument is the mock object to configure. If None (the default) then a MagicMock will be created for you, with the API limited to methods or attributes available on standard file handles.
read_data is a string for the read method of the file handle to return. This is an empty string by default.
>>> from mock import mock_open, patch
>>> m = mock_open()
>>> with patch('{}.open'.format(__name__), m, create=True):
... with open('foo', 'w') as h:
... h.write('some stuff')
>>> m.assert_called_once_with('foo', 'w')
>>> handle = m()
>>> handle.write.assert_called_once_with('some stuff')
回答 3
要对一个简单文件使用嘲笑read()
(打开)(此页面上已经给出的原始嘲笑的片段更适合写入):
my_text = "some text to return when read() is called on the file object"
mocked_open_function = mock.mock_open(read_data=my_text)
with mock.patch("__builtin__.open", mocked_open_function):
with open("any_string") as f:
print f.read()
请注意,根据嘲笑文档的doc,这是专门针对的read()
,因此不适for line in f
用于像这样的常见模式。
使用python 2.6.6 /模拟1.0.1
To use mock_open for a simple file read()
(the original mock_open snippet already given on this page is geared more for write):
my_text = "some text to return when read() is called on the file object"
mocked_open_function = mock.mock_open(read_data=my_text)
with mock.patch("__builtin__.open", mocked_open_function):
with open("any_string") as f:
print f.read()
Note as per docs for mock_open, this is specifically for read()
, so won’t work with common patterns like for line in f
, for example.
Uses python 2.6.6 / mock 1.0.1
回答 4
最佳答案很有用,但我对此进行了扩展。
如果要基于传递给此处的参数设置文件对象(f
in as f
)的值,open()
这是一种实现方法:
def save_arg_return_data(*args, **kwargs):
mm = MagicMock(spec=file)
mm.__enter__.return_value = do_something_with_data(*args, **kwargs)
return mm
m = MagicMock()
m.side_effect = save_arg_return_array_of_data
# if your open() call is in the file mymodule.animals
# use mymodule.animals as name_of_called_file
open_name = '%s.open' % name_of_called_file
with patch(open_name, m, create=True):
#do testing here
基本上,open()
将返回一个对象并with
调用__enter__()
该对象。
为了正确模拟,我们必须模拟open()
返回一个模拟对象。然后,该模拟对象应该模拟对其的__enter__()
调用(MagicMock
将为我们执行此操作),以返回我们想要的模拟数据/文件对象(因此mm.__enter__.return_value
)。通过上面的方法使用2个模拟进行此操作,我们可以捕获传递给参数的参数open()
并将其传递给我们的do_something_with_data
方法。
我将整个模拟文件作为字符串传递给了open()
我,do_something_with_data
如下所示:
def do_something_with_data(*args, **kwargs):
return args[0].split("\n")
这会将字符串转换为列表,因此您可以像处理普通文件一样执行以下操作:
for line in file:
#do action
The top answer is useful but I expanded on it a bit.
If you want to set the value of your file object (the f
in as f
) based on the arguments passed to open()
here’s one way to do it:
def save_arg_return_data(*args, **kwargs):
mm = MagicMock(spec=file)
mm.__enter__.return_value = do_something_with_data(*args, **kwargs)
return mm
m = MagicMock()
m.side_effect = save_arg_return_array_of_data
# if your open() call is in the file mymodule.animals
# use mymodule.animals as name_of_called_file
open_name = '%s.open' % name_of_called_file
with patch(open_name, m, create=True):
#do testing here
Basically, open()
will return an object and with
will call __enter__()
on that object.
To mock properly, we must mock open()
to return a mock object. That mock object should then mock the __enter__()
call on it (MagicMock
will do this for us) to return the mock data/file object we want (hence mm.__enter__.return_value
). Doing this with 2 mocks the way above allows us to capture the arguments passed to open()
and pass them to our do_something_with_data
method.
I passed an entire mock file as a string to open()
and my do_something_with_data
looked like this:
def do_something_with_data(*args, **kwargs):
return args[0].split("\n")
This transforms the string into a list so you can do the following as you would with a normal file:
for line in file:
#do action
回答 5
我可能对游戏有些迟了,但是当我调用open
另一个模块而不必创建新文件时,这对我有用。
test.py
import unittest
from mock import Mock, patch, mock_open
from MyObj import MyObj
class TestObj(unittest.TestCase):
open_ = mock_open()
with patch.object(__builtin__, "open", open_):
ref = MyObj()
ref.save("myfile.txt")
assert open_.call_args_list == [call("myfile.txt", "wb")]
MyObj.py
class MyObj(object):
def save(self, filename):
with open(filename, "wb") as f:
f.write("sample text")
通过open
将__builtin__
模块内部的功能修补到my mock_open()
,可以模拟写入文件而无需创建文件。
注意:如果您正在使用使用cython的模块,或者您的程序以任何方式依赖cython,则需要通过在文件顶部包含来导入import __builtin__
。__builtin__
如果您使用cython,则将无法模拟通用。
I might be a bit late to the game, but this worked for me when calling open
in another module without having to create a new file.
test.py
import unittest
from mock import Mock, patch, mock_open
from MyObj import MyObj
class TestObj(unittest.TestCase):
open_ = mock_open()
with patch.object(__builtin__, "open", open_):
ref = MyObj()
ref.save("myfile.txt")
assert open_.call_args_list == [call("myfile.txt", "wb")]
MyObj.py
class MyObj(object):
def save(self, filename):
with open(filename, "wb") as f:
f.write("sample text")
By patching the open
function inside the __builtin__
module to my mock_open()
, I can mock writing to a file without creating one.
Note: If you are using a module that uses cython, or your program depends on cython in any way, you will need to import by including import __builtin__
at the top of your file. You will not be able to mock the universal __builtin__
if you are using cython.
回答 6
要使用unittest修补内置的open()函数:
这适用于读取json配置的补丁。
class ObjectUnderTest:
def __init__(self, filename: str):
with open(filename, 'r') as f:
dict_content = json.load(f)
模拟对象是open()函数返回的io.TextIOWrapper对象。
@patch("<src.where.object.is.used>.open",
return_value=io.TextIOWrapper(io.BufferedReader(io.BytesIO(b'{"test_key": "test_value"}'))))
def test_object_function_under_test(self, mocker):
To patch the built-in open() function with unittest:
This worked for a patch to read a json config.
class ObjectUnderTest:
def __init__(self, filename: str):
with open(filename, 'r') as f:
dict_content = json.load(f)
The mocked object is the io.TextIOWrapper object returned by the open() function
@patch("<src.where.object.is.used>.open",
return_value=io.TextIOWrapper(io.BufferedReader(io.BytesIO(b'{"test_key": "test_value"}'))))
def test_object_function_under_test(self, mocker):
回答 7
如果您不再需要任何文件,则可以装饰测试方法:
@patch('builtins.open', mock_open(read_data="data"))
def test_testme():
result = testeme()
assert result == "data"
If you don’t need any file further, you can decorate the test method:
@patch('builtins.open', mock_open(read_data="data"))
def test_testme():
result = testeme()
assert result == "data"
声明:本站所有文章,如无特殊说明或标注,均为本站原创发布。任何个人或组织,在未征得本站同意时,禁止复制、盗用、采集、发布本站内容到任何网站、书籍等各类媒体平台。如若本站内容侵犯了原著者的合法权益,可联系我们进行处理。