问题:如何正确忽略异常

当您只想执行try-except但不处理异常时,如何在Python中进行呢?

以下是正确的方法吗?

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except:
    pass

When you just want to do a try-except without handling the exception, how do you do it in Python?

Is the following the right way to do it?

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except:
    pass

回答 0

try:
    doSomething()
except: 
    pass

要么

try:
    doSomething()
except Exception: 
    pass

所不同的是,第一个也将赶上KeyboardInterruptSystemExit和类似的东西,这是直接来源于exceptions.BaseException,没有exceptions.Exception

有关详细信息,请参见文档:

try:
    doSomething()
except: 
    pass

or

try:
    doSomething()
except Exception: 
    pass

The difference is that the first one will also catch KeyboardInterrupt, SystemExit and stuff like that, which are derived directly from exceptions.BaseException, not exceptions.Exception.

See documentation for details:


回答 1

通常,仅捕获您感兴趣的错误是最佳实践。在这种情况下,shutil.rmtree可能是OSError

>>> shutil.rmtree("/fake/dir")
Traceback (most recent call last):
    [...]
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/fake/dir'

如果要静默忽略该错误,则可以执行以下操作:

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError:
    pass

为什么?说您(以某种方式)不小心将整数而不是字符串传递给函数,例如:

shutil.rmtree(2)

它将给出错误“ TypeError:强制转换为Unicode:需要字符串或缓冲区,找到int” -您可能不想忽略它,这可能很难调试。

如果您确实想忽略所有错误,请抓住Exception而不是仅仅except:声明。同样,为什么呢?

不指定异常会捕获所有异常,包括SystemExit例如sys.exit()使用的异常:

>>> try:
...     sys.exit(1)
... except:
...     pass
... 
>>>

将此与以下内容进行比较,即可正确退出:

>>> try:
...     sys.exit(1)
... except Exception:
...     pass
... 
shell:~$ 

如果您想编写更好的行为代码,则异常可以表示各种错误,但是在上面的示例中,我们仅想忽略Errno 2,因此我们可以更加具体:

import errno

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError as e:
    if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
        # ignore "No such file or directory", but re-raise other errors
        raise

It’s generally considered best-practice to only catch the errors you are interested in. In the case of shutil.rmtree it’s probably OSError:

>>> shutil.rmtree("/fake/dir")
Traceback (most recent call last):
    [...]
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/fake/dir'

If you want to silently ignore that error, you would do:

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError:
    pass

Why? Say you (somehow) accidently pass the function an integer instead of a string, like:

shutil.rmtree(2)

It will give the error “TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, int found” – you probably don’t want to ignore that, which can be difficult to debug.

If you definitely want to ignore all errors, catch Exception rather than a bare except: statement. Again, why?

Not specifying an exception catches every exception, including the SystemExit exception which for example sys.exit() uses:

>>> try:
...     sys.exit(1)
... except:
...     pass
... 
>>>

Compare this to the following, which correctly exits:

>>> try:
...     sys.exit(1)
... except Exception:
...     pass
... 
shell:~$ 

If you want to write ever better behaving code, the exception can represent various errors, but in the example above we only want to ignore Errno 2, so we could be even more specific:

import errno

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError as e:
    if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
        # ignore "No such file or directory", but re-raise other errors
        raise

回答 2

当您只想尝试捕获而不处理异常时,如何在Python中执行呢?

这取决于您所说的“处理”。

如果您打算不采取任何措施就将其捕获,则发布的代码将起作用。

如果您是想对异常采取措施而又不阻止异常上升,那么您需要这样的东西:

try:
    do_something()
except:
    handle_exception()
    raise  #re-raise the exact same exception that was thrown

When you just want to do a try catch without handling the exception, how do you do it in Python?

It depends on what you mean by “handling.”

If you mean to catch it without taking any action, the code you posted will work.

If you mean that you want to take action on an exception without stopping the exception from going up the stack, then you want something like this:

try:
    do_something()
except:
    handle_exception()
    raise  #re-raise the exact same exception that was thrown

回答 3

首先,我从这个话题中引述杰克·奥康纳的答案。引用的线程已关闭,所以我在这里写:

“ Python 3.4中引入了一种新的方法:

from contextlib import suppress

with suppress(Exception):
    # your code

这是添加了它的提交:http : //hg.python.org/cpython/rev/406b47c64480

这是作者Raymond Hettinger,讨论了这一点以及其他各种Python热度:https ://youtu.be/OSGv2VnC0go ? t = 43m23s

我对此的补充是Python 2.7等效项:

from contextlib import contextmanager

@contextmanager
def ignored(*exceptions):
    try:
        yield
    except exceptions:
        pass

然后像在Python 3.4中一样使用它:

with ignored(Exception):
    # your code

First I quote the answer of Jack o’Connor from this thread. The referenced thread got closed so I write here:

“There’s a new way to do this coming in Python 3.4:

from contextlib import suppress

with suppress(Exception):
    # your code

Here’s the commit that added it: http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/406b47c64480

And here’s the author, Raymond Hettinger, talking about this and all sorts of other Python hotness: https://youtu.be/OSGv2VnC0go?t=43m23s

My addition to this is the Python 2.7 equivalent:

from contextlib import contextmanager

@contextmanager
def ignored(*exceptions):
    try:
        yield
    except exceptions:
        pass

Then you use it like in Python 3.4:

with ignored(Exception):
    # your code

回答 4

为了完整性:

>>> def divide(x, y):
...     try:
...         result = x / y
...     except ZeroDivisionError:
...         print("division by zero!")
...     else:
...         print("result is", result)
...     finally:
...         print("executing finally clause")

还要注意,您可以像这样捕获异常:

>>> try:
...     this_fails()
... except ZeroDivisionError as err:
...     print("Handling run-time error:", err)

…并重新引发如下异常:

>>> try:
...     raise NameError('HiThere')
... except NameError:
...     print('An exception flew by!')
...     raise

…来自python教程的示例。

For completeness:

>>> def divide(x, y):
...     try:
...         result = x / y
...     except ZeroDivisionError:
...         print("division by zero!")
...     else:
...         print("result is", result)
...     finally:
...         print("executing finally clause")

Also note that you can capture the exception like this:

>>> try:
...     this_fails()
... except ZeroDivisionError as err:
...     print("Handling run-time error:", err)

…and re-raise the exception like this:

>>> try:
...     raise NameError('HiThere')
... except NameError:
...     print('An exception flew by!')
...     raise

…examples from the python tutorial.


回答 5

如何正确忽略异常?

有几种方法可以做到这一点。

但是,示例的选择具有一个不包含一般情况的简单解决方案。

特定于示例:

代替

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except:
    pass

做这个:

shutil.rmtree(path, ignore_errors=True)

这是特定于的论点shutil.rmtree。您可以通过执行以下操作来查看有关此操作的帮助,并且您还将看到它还允许错误处理功能。

>>> import shutil
>>> help(shutil.rmtree)

由于这仅涵盖了示例的狭义情况,因此我将进一步说明如果这些关键字参数不存在,该如何处理。

一般的做法

由于上面仅涵盖了示例的狭义情况,因此我将进一步演示如果这些关键字参数不存在,该如何处理。

Python 3.4的新功能:

您可以导入suppress上下文管理器:

from contextlib import suppress

但只禁止最具体的exceptions:

with suppress(FileNotFoundError):
    shutil.rmtree(path)

您将默默地忽略FileNotFoundError

>>> with suppress(FileNotFoundError):
...     shutil.rmtree('bajkjbkdlsjfljsf')
... 
>>> 

文档

与其他任何完全抑制异常的机制一样,此上下文管理器仅应用于涵盖非常具体的错误,在这些错误中,静默地继续执行程序是正确的做法。

请注意,suppress并且FileNotFoundError仅在Python 3中可用。

如果您还希望代码也可以在Python 2中运行,请参阅下一节:

Python 2和3:

当您只想尝试/exceptions而不处理异常时,如何在Python中进行呢?

以下是正确的方法吗?

try :
    shutil.rmtree ( path )
except :
    pass

对于与Python 2兼容的代码,这pass是不执行操作的正确方法。但是,当你做一个光秃秃的except:,这是一样的做except BaseException:,其中包括GeneratorExitKeyboardInterrupt,和SystemExit,一般来说,你不想要赶上那些东西。

实际上,在命名异常时应尽可能具体。

这是Python(2)异常层次结构的一部分,如您所见,如果您捕获了更多常规异常,则可以隐藏您没有想到的问题:

BaseException
 +-- SystemExit
 +-- KeyboardInterrupt
 +-- GeneratorExit
 +-- Exception
      +-- StopIteration
      +-- StandardError
      |    +-- BufferError
      |    +-- ArithmeticError
      |    |    +-- FloatingPointError
      |    |    +-- OverflowError
      |    |    +-- ZeroDivisionError
      |    +-- AssertionError
      |    +-- AttributeError
      |    +-- EnvironmentError
      |    |    +-- IOError
      |    |    +-- OSError
      |    |         +-- WindowsError (Windows)
      |    |         +-- VMSError (VMS)
      |    +-- EOFError
... and so on

您可能想在这里捕获OSError,也许您不关心的异常是没有目录。

我们可以从库中获取特定的错误号errno,如果没有该错误号,则重新引发:

import errno

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError as error:
    if error.errno == errno.ENOENT: # no such file or directory
        pass
    else: # we had an OSError we didn't expect, so reraise it
        raise 

请注意,不加薪将引发原始异常,在这种情况下,这可能就是您想要的。简明扼要,因为pass在异常处理中我们实际上不需要显式地使用代码:

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError as error:
    if error.errno != errno.ENOENT: # no such file or directory
        raise 

How to properly ignore Exceptions?

There are several ways of doing this.

However, the choice of example has a simple solution that does not cover the general case.

Specific to the example:

Instead of

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except:
    pass

Do this:

shutil.rmtree(path, ignore_errors=True)

This is an argument specific to shutil.rmtree. You can see the help on it by doing the following, and you’ll see it can also allow for functionality on errors as well.

>>> import shutil
>>> help(shutil.rmtree)

Since this only covers the narrow case of the example, I’ll further demonstrate how to handle this if those keyword arguments didn’t exist.

General approach

Since the above only covers the narrow case of the example, I’ll further demonstrate how to handle this if those keyword arguments didn’t exist.

New in Python 3.4:

You can import the suppress context manager:

from contextlib import suppress

But only suppress the most specific exception:

with suppress(FileNotFoundError):
    shutil.rmtree(path)

You will silently ignore a FileNotFoundError:

>>> with suppress(FileNotFoundError):
...     shutil.rmtree('bajkjbkdlsjfljsf')
... 
>>> 

From the docs:

As with any other mechanism that completely suppresses exceptions, this context manager should be used only to cover very specific errors where silently continuing with program execution is known to be the right thing to do.

Note that suppress and FileNotFoundError are only available in Python 3.

If you want your code to work in Python 2 as well, see the next section:

Python 2 & 3:

When you just want to do a try/except without handling the exception, how do you do it in Python?

Is the following the right way to do it?

try :
    shutil.rmtree ( path )
except :
    pass

For Python 2 compatible code, pass is the correct way to have a statement that’s a no-op. But when you do a bare except:, that’s the same as doing except BaseException: which includes GeneratorExit, KeyboardInterrupt, and SystemExit, and in general, you don’t want to catch those things.

In fact, you should be as specific in naming the exception as you can.

Here’s part of the Python (2) exception hierarchy, and as you can see, if you catch more general Exceptions, you can hide problems you did not expect:

BaseException
 +-- SystemExit
 +-- KeyboardInterrupt
 +-- GeneratorExit
 +-- Exception
      +-- StopIteration
      +-- StandardError
      |    +-- BufferError
      |    +-- ArithmeticError
      |    |    +-- FloatingPointError
      |    |    +-- OverflowError
      |    |    +-- ZeroDivisionError
      |    +-- AssertionError
      |    +-- AttributeError
      |    +-- EnvironmentError
      |    |    +-- IOError
      |    |    +-- OSError
      |    |         +-- WindowsError (Windows)
      |    |         +-- VMSError (VMS)
      |    +-- EOFError
... and so on

You probably want to catch an OSError here, and maybe the exception you don’t care about is if there is no directory.

We can get that specific error number from the errno library, and reraise if we don’t have that:

import errno

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError as error:
    if error.errno == errno.ENOENT: # no such file or directory
        pass
    else: # we had an OSError we didn't expect, so reraise it
        raise 

Note, a bare raise raises the original exception, which is probably what you want in this case. Written more concisely, as we don’t really need to explicitly pass with code in the exception handling:

try:
    shutil.rmtree(path)
except OSError as error:
    if error.errno != errno.ENOENT: # no such file or directory
        raise 

回答 6

当您只想尝试捕获而不处理异常时,如何在Python中执行呢?

这将帮助您打印出异常是什么(例如,在不处理异常的情况下尝试捕获并打印异常。)

import sys
try:
    doSomething()
except:
    print "Unexpected error:", sys.exc_info()[0]

When you just want to do a try catch without handling the exception, how do you do it in Python?

This will help you to print what the exception is:( i.e. try catch without handling the exception and print the exception.)

import sys
try:
    doSomething()
except:
    print "Unexpected error:", sys.exc_info()[0]

回答 7

try:
      doSomething()
except Exception: 
    pass
else:
      stuffDoneIf()
      TryClauseSucceeds()

仅供参考,else子句可以在所有异常之后执行,并且仅在try中的代码不会引起异常的情况下才会运行。

try:
      doSomething()
except Exception: 
    pass
else:
      stuffDoneIf()
      TryClauseSucceeds()

FYI the else clause can go after all exceptions and will only be run if the code in the try doesn’t cause an exception.


回答 8

我需要忽略多个命令中的错误,fuckit做到了

import fuckit

@fuckit
def helper():
    print('before')
    1/0
    print('after1')
    1/0
    print('after2')

helper()

I needed to ignore errors in multiple commands and fuckit did the trick

import fuckit

@fuckit
def helper():
    print('before')
    1/0
    print('after1')
    1/0
    print('after2')

helper()

回答 9

在Python中,我们处理与其他语言相似的异常,但是区别在于语法上有些差异,例如,

try:
    #Your code in which exception can occur
except <here we can put in a particular exception name>:
    # We can call that exception here also, like ZeroDivisionError()
    # now your code
# We can put in a finally block also
finally:
    # Your code...

In Python, we handle exceptions similar to other language, but the difference is some syntax difference, for example,

try:
    #Your code in which exception can occur
except <here we can put in a particular exception name>:
    # We can call that exception here also, like ZeroDivisionError()
    # now your code
# We can put in a finally block also
finally:
    # Your code...

回答 10

我通常只是这样做:

try:
    doSomething()
except:
    _ = ""

I usually just do:

try:
    doSomething()
except:
    _ = ""

声明:本站所有文章,如无特殊说明或标注,均为本站原创发布。任何个人或组织,在未征得本站同意时,禁止复制、盗用、采集、发布本站内容到任何网站、书籍等各类媒体平台。如若本站内容侵犯了原著者的合法权益,可联系我们进行处理。