脾气暴躁的索引切片而不会丢失尺寸信息

I’m using numpy and want to index a row without losing the dimension information.

import numpy as np
X = np.zeros((100,10))
X.shape        # >> (100, 10)
xslice = X[10,:]
xslice.shape   # >> (10,)  

In this example xslice is now 1 dimension, but I want it to be (1,10). In R, I would use X[10,:,drop=F]. Is there something similar in numpy. I couldn’t find it in the documentation and didn’t see a similar question asked.

Thanks!

It’s probably easiest to do x[None, 10, :] or equivalently (but more readable) x[np.newaxis, 10, :].

As far as why it’s not the default, personally, I find that constantly having arrays with singleton dimensions gets annoying very quickly. I’d guess the numpy devs felt the same way.

Also, numpy handle broadcasting arrays very well, so there’s usually little reason to retain the dimension of the array the slice came from. If you did, then things like:

a = np.zeros((100,100,10))
b = np.zeros(100,10)
a[0,:,:] = b

either wouldn’t work or would be much more difficult to implement.

(Or at least that’s my guess at the numpy dev’s reasoning behind dropping dimension info when slicing)

Another solution is to do

X[[10],:]

or

I = array([10])
X[I,:]

The dimensionality of an array is preserved when indexing is performed by a list (or an array) of indexes. This is nice because it leaves you with the choice between keeping the dimension and squeezing.

I found a few reasonable solutions.

1) use numpy.take(X,[10],0)

2) use this strange indexing X[10:11:, :]

Ideally, this should be the default. I never understood why dimensions are ever dropped. But that’s a discussion for numpy…

Here’s an alternative I like better. Instead of indexing with a single number, index with a range. That is, use X[10:11,:]. (Note that 10:11 does not include 11).

import numpy as np
X = np.zeros((100,10))
X.shape        # >> (100, 10)
xslice = X[10:11,:]
xslice.shape   # >> (1,10)

This makes it easy to understand with more dimensions too, no None juggling and figuring out which axis to use which index. Also no need to do extra bookkeeping regarding array size, just i:i+1 for any i that you would have used in regular indexing.

b = np.ones((2, 3, 4))
b.shape # >> (2, 3, 4)
b[1:2,:,:].shape  # >> (1, 3, 4)
b[:, 2:3, :].shape .  # >> (2, 1, 4)

To add to the solution involving indexing by lists or arrays by gnebehay, it is also possible to use tuples:

X[(10,),:]

This is especially annoying if you’re indexing by an array that might be length 1 at runtime. For that case, there’s np.ix_:

some_array[np.ix_(row_index,column_index)]