问题：如何计算列表项的出现？
给定一个项目，我如何计算它在Python列表中的出现次数？
Given an item, how can I count its occurrences in a list in Python?
回答 0
如果只需要一项的计数，请使用以下count方法：
>>> [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1].count(1)
3
如果您要计算多个项目，请不要使用它。count循环调用需要为每个count调用单独遍历列表，这可能会对性能造成灾难性影响。如果您要计算所有项目，甚至只是多个项目，请使用Counter，如其他答案中所述。
If you only want one item’s count, use the count method:
>>> [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1].count(1)
3
Don’t use this if you want to count multiple items. Calling count in a loop requires a separate pass over the list for every count call, which can be catastrophic for performance. If you want to count all items, or even just multiple items, use Counter, as explained in the other answers.
回答 1
使用Counter如果你正在使用Python 2.7或3.x和你想出现的每个元素的数量：
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> z = ['blue', 'red', 'blue', 'yellow', 'blue', 'red']
>>> Counter(z)
Counter({'blue': 3, 'red': 2, 'yellow': 1})
Use Counter if you are using Python 2.7 or 3.x and you want the number of occurrences for each element:
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> z = ['blue', 'red', 'blue', 'yellow', 'blue', 'red']
>>> Counter(z)
Counter({'blue': 3, 'red': 2, 'yellow': 1})
回答 2
计算列表中一项的出现
仅计算一个列表项的出现次数即可 count()
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> l.count("a")
1
>>> l.count("b")
2
计算列表中所有项目的出现次数也称为“对列表进行计数”或创建计数计数器。
用count（）计算所有项目
要计算l一个项目的出现次数，只需使用列表理解和count()方法
[[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]
（或类似的字典dict((x,l.count(x)) for x in set(l))）
例：
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> [[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]
[['a', 1], ['b', 2]]
>>> dict((x,l.count(x)) for x in set(l))
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
用Counter（）计算所有项目
或者，库中有更快的Counter类collections
Counter(l)
例：
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> Counter(l)
Counter({'b': 2, 'a': 1})
计数器快多少？
我检查Counter了清单的计算速度。我尝试了两种方法的几个值，n并且看起来Counter快了大约2的常数。
这是我使用的脚本：
from __future__ import print_function
import timeit
t1=timeit.Timer('Counter(l)', \
'import random;import string;from collections import Counter;n=1000;l=[random.choice(string.ascii_letters) for x in range(n)]'
)
t2=timeit.Timer('[[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]',
'import random;import string;n=1000;l=[random.choice(string.ascii_letters) for x in range(n)]'
)
print("Counter(): ", t1.repeat(repeat=3,number=10000))
print("count(): ", t2.repeat(repeat=3,number=10000)
并输出：
Counter(): [0.46062711701961234, 0.4022796869976446, 0.3974247490405105]
count(): [7.779430688009597, 7.962715800967999, 8.420845870045014]
Counting the occurrences of one item in a list
For counting the occurrences of just one list item you can use count()
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> l.count("a")
1
>>> l.count("b")
2
Counting the occurrences of all items in a list is also known as “tallying” a list, or creating a tally counter.
Counting all items with count()
To count the occurrences of items in l one can simply use a list comprehension and the count() method
[[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]
(or similarly with a dictionary dict((x,l.count(x)) for x in set(l)))
Example:
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> [[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]
[['a', 1], ['b', 2]]
>>> dict((x,l.count(x)) for x in set(l))
{'a': 1, 'b': 2}
Counting all items with Counter()
Alternatively, there’s the faster Counter class from the collections library
Counter(l)
Example:
>>> l = ["a","b","b"]
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> Counter(l)
Counter({'b': 2, 'a': 1})
How much faster is Counter?
I checked how much faster Counter is for tallying lists. I tried both methods out with a few values of n and it appears that Counter is faster by a constant factor of approximately 2.
Here is the script I used:
from __future__ import print_function
import timeit
t1=timeit.Timer('Counter(l)', \
'import random;import string;from collections import Counter;n=1000;l=[random.choice(string.ascii_letters) for x in range(n)]'
)
t2=timeit.Timer('[[x,l.count(x)] for x in set(l)]',
'import random;import string;n=1000;l=[random.choice(string.ascii_letters) for x in range(n)]'
)
print("Counter(): ", t1.repeat(repeat=3,number=10000))
print("count(): ", t2.repeat(repeat=3,number=10000)
And the output:
Counter(): [0.46062711701961234, 0.4022796869976446, 0.3974247490405105]
count(): [7.779430688009597, 7.962715800967999, 8.420845870045014]
回答 3
获取字典中每个项目出现次数的另一种方法是：
dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in a)
Another way to get the number of occurrences of each item, in a dictionary:
dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in a)
回答 4
回答 5
给定一个项目，我如何计算它在Python列表中的出现次数？
这是一个示例列表：
>>> l = list('aaaaabbbbcccdde')
>>> l
['a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'd', 'd', 'e']
list.count
有list.count方法
>>> l.count('b')
4
这适用于任何列表。元组也有这种方法：
>>> t = tuple('aabbbffffff')
>>> t
('a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f')
>>> t.count('f')
6
collections.Counter
然后是collections.Counter。您可以将任何可迭代的对象转储到Counter中，而不仅仅是列表，并且Counter将保留元素计数的数据结构。
用法：
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> c = Counter(l)
>>> c['b']
4
计数器基于Python字典，它们的键是元素，因此键必须是可哈希的。它们基本上就像允许多余元素进入的集合。
的进一步使用 collections.Counter
您可以从计数器中添加或减去可迭代项：
>>> c.update(list('bbb'))
>>> c['b']
7
>>> c.subtract(list('bbb'))
>>> c['b']
4
您还可以使用计数器进行多组操作：
>>> c2 = Counter(list('aabbxyz'))
>>> c - c2 # set difference
Counter({'a': 3, 'c': 3, 'b': 2, 'd': 2, 'e': 1})
>>> c + c2 # addition of all elements
Counter({'a': 7, 'b': 6, 'c': 3, 'd': 2, 'e': 1, 'y': 1, 'x': 1, 'z': 1})
>>> c | c2 # set union
Counter({'a': 5, 'b': 4, 'c': 3, 'd': 2, 'e': 1, 'y': 1, 'x': 1, 'z': 1})
>>> c & c2 # set intersection
Counter({'a': 2, 'b': 2})
为什么不熊猫呢？
另一个答案表明：
为什么不使用熊猫？
熊猫是一个公共库，但不在标准库中。根据需要添加它并非易事。
在列表对象本身以及标准库中都有针对此用例的内置解决方案。
如果您的项目不再需要熊猫，那么仅将其作为此功能的要求是愚蠢的。
Given an item, how can I count its occurrences in a list in Python?
Here’s an example list:
>>> l = list('aaaaabbbbcccdde')
>>> l
['a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'c', 'c', 'c', 'd', 'd', 'e']
list.count
There’s the list.count method
>>> l.count('b')
4
This works fine for any list. Tuples have this method as well:
>>> t = tuple('aabbbffffff')
>>> t
('a', 'a', 'b', 'b', 'b', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f', 'f')
>>> t.count('f')
6
collections.Counter
And then there’s collections.Counter. You can dump any iterable into a Counter, not just a list, and the Counter will retain a data structure of the counts of the elements.
Usage:
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> c = Counter(l)
>>> c['b']
4
Counters are based on Python dictionaries, their keys are the elements, so the keys need to be hashable. They are basically like sets that allow redundant elements into them.
Further usage of collections.Counter
You can add or subtract with iterables from your counter:
>>> c.update(list('bbb'))
>>> c['b']
7
>>> c.subtract(list('bbb'))
>>> c['b']
4
And you can do multi-set operations with the counter as well:
>>> c2 = Counter(list('aabbxyz'))
>>> c - c2 # set difference
Counter({'a': 3, 'c': 3, 'b': 2, 'd': 2, 'e': 1})
>>> c + c2 # addition of all elements
Counter({'a': 7, 'b': 6, 'c': 3, 'd': 2, 'e': 1, 'y': 1, 'x': 1, 'z': 1})
>>> c | c2 # set union
Counter({'a': 5, 'b': 4, 'c': 3, 'd': 2, 'e': 1, 'y': 1, 'x': 1, 'z': 1})
>>> c & c2 # set intersection
Counter({'a': 2, 'b': 2})
Why not pandas?
Another answer suggests:
Why not use pandas?
Pandas is a common library, but it’s not in the standard library. Adding it as a requirement is non-trivial.
There are builtin solutions for this use-case in the list object itself as well as in the standard library.
If your project does not already require pandas, it would be foolish to make it a requirement just for this functionality.
回答 6
我已经将所有建议的解决方案（以及一些新的解决方案）与perfplot（我的一个小项目）进行了比较。
计数一个项目
对于足够大的阵列，事实证明
numpy.sum(numpy.array(a) == 1)
比其他解决方案快一点。
计算所有项目
由于之前建立的，
numpy.bincount(a)
是你想要的。
复制代码的代码：
from collections import Counter
from collections import defaultdict
import numpy
import operator
import pandas
import perfplot
def counter(a):
return Counter(a)
def count(a):
return dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in set(a))
def bincount(a):
return numpy.bincount(a)
def pandas_value_counts(a):
return pandas.Series(a).value_counts()
def occur_dict(a):
d = {}
for i in a:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
def operator_countof(a):
return dict((i, operator.countOf(a, i)) for i in set(a))
perfplot.show(
setup=lambda n: list(numpy.random.randint(0, 100, n)),
n_range=[2**k for k in range(20)],
kernels=[
counter, count, bincount, pandas_value_counts, occur_dict,
count_unsorted_list_items, operator_countof
],
equality_check=None,
logx=True,
logy=True,
)
2。
from collections import Counter
from collections import defaultdict
import numpy
import operator
import pandas
import perfplot
def counter(a):
return Counter(a)
def count(a):
return dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in set(a))
def bincount(a):
return numpy.bincount(a)
def pandas_value_counts(a):
return pandas.Series(a).value_counts()
def occur_dict(a):
d = {}
for i in a:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
def operator_countof(a):
return dict((i, operator.countOf(a, i)) for i in set(a))
perfplot.show(
setup=lambda n: list(numpy.random.randint(0, 100, n)),
n_range=[2**k for k in range(20)],
kernels=[
counter, count, bincount, pandas_value_counts, occur_dict,
count_unsorted_list_items, operator_countof
],
equality_check=None,
logx=True,
logy=True,
)
I’ve compared all suggested solutions (and a few new ones) with perfplot (a small project of mine).
Counting one item
For large enough arrays, it turns out that
numpy.sum(numpy.array(a) == 1)
is slightly faster than the other solutions.
Counting all items
As established before,
numpy.bincount(a)
is what you want.
Code to reproduce the plots:
from collections import Counter
from collections import defaultdict
import numpy
import operator
import pandas
import perfplot
def counter(a):
return Counter(a)
def count(a):
return dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in set(a))
def bincount(a):
return numpy.bincount(a)
def pandas_value_counts(a):
return pandas.Series(a).value_counts()
def occur_dict(a):
d = {}
for i in a:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
def operator_countof(a):
return dict((i, operator.countOf(a, i)) for i in set(a))
perfplot.show(
setup=lambda n: list(numpy.random.randint(0, 100, n)),
n_range=[2**k for k in range(20)],
kernels=[
counter, count, bincount, pandas_value_counts, occur_dict,
count_unsorted_list_items, operator_countof
],
equality_check=None,
logx=True,
logy=True,
)
2.
from collections import Counter
from collections import defaultdict
import numpy
import operator
import pandas
import perfplot
def counter(a):
return Counter(a)
def count(a):
return dict((i, a.count(i)) for i in set(a))
def bincount(a):
return numpy.bincount(a)
def pandas_value_counts(a):
return pandas.Series(a).value_counts()
def occur_dict(a):
d = {}
for i in a:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
def operator_countof(a):
return dict((i, operator.countOf(a, i)) for i in set(a))
perfplot.show(
setup=lambda n: list(numpy.random.randint(0, 100, n)),
n_range=[2**k for k in range(20)],
kernels=[
counter, count, bincount, pandas_value_counts, occur_dict,
count_unsorted_list_items, operator_countof
],
equality_check=None,
logx=True,
logy=True,
)
回答 7
如果您想一次计算所有值，则可以使用numpy数组快速完成bincount，如下所示
import numpy as np
a = np.array([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1])
np.bincount(a)
这使
>>> array([0, 3, 1, 1, 2])
If you want to count all values at once you can do it very fast using numpy arrays and bincount as follows
import numpy as np
a = np.array([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1])
np.bincount(a)
which gives
>>> array([0, 3, 1, 1, 2])
回答 8
如果可以使用pandas，则value_counts可以在那里进行救援。
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1]
>>> pd.Series(a).value_counts()
1 3
4 2
3 1
2 1
dtype: int64
它还会根据频率自动对结果进行排序。
如果您希望结果在列表列表中，请执行以下操作
>>> pd.Series(a).value_counts().reset_index().values.tolist()
[[1, 3], [4, 2], [3, 1], [2, 1]]
If you can use pandas, then value_counts is there for rescue.
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1]
>>> pd.Series(a).value_counts()
1 3
4 2
3 1
2 1
dtype: int64
It automatically sorts the result based on frequency as well.
If you want the result to be in a list of list, do as below
>>> pd.Series(a).value_counts().reset_index().values.tolist()
[[1, 3], [4, 2], [3, 1], [2, 1]]
回答 9
为什么不使用熊猫呢？
import pandas as pd
l = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'a', 'd', 'a']
# converting the list to a Series and counting the values
my_count = pd.Series(l).value_counts()
my_count
输出：
a 3
d 2
b 1
c 1
dtype: int64
如果要查找特定元素的数量，请说a，请尝试：
my_count['a']
输出：
3
Why not using Pandas?
import pandas as pd
l = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'a', 'd', 'a']
# converting the list to a Series and counting the values
my_count = pd.Series(l).value_counts()
my_count
Output:
a 3
d 2
b 1
c 1
dtype: int64
If you are looking for a count of a particular element, say a, try:
my_count['a']
Output:
3
回答 10
我今天遇到了这个问题，在考虑检查SO之前推出了自己的解决方案。这个：
dict((i,a.count(i)) for i in a)
对于大型列表，真的非常慢。我的解决方案
def occurDict(items):
d = {}
for i in items:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
实际上比Counter解决方案要快一点，至少对于Python 2.7而言。
I had this problem today and rolled my own solution before I thought to check SO. This:
dict((i,a.count(i)) for i in a)
is really, really slow for large lists. My solution
def occurDict(items):
d = {}
for i in items:
if i in d:
d[i] = d[i]+1
else:
d[i] = 1
return d
is actually a bit faster than the Counter solution, at least for Python 2.7.
回答 11
# Python >= 2.6 (defaultdict) && < 2.7 (Counter, OrderedDict)
from collections import defaultdict
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
"""
:param items: iterable of hashable items to count
:type items: iterable
:returns: dict of counts like Py2.7 Counter
:rtype: dict
"""
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
# Python >= 2.2 (generators)
def count_sorted_list_items(items):
"""
:param items: sorted iterable of items to count
:type items: sorted iterable
:returns: generator of (item, count) tuples
:rtype: generator
"""
if not items:
return
elif len(items) == 1:
yield (items[0], 1)
return
prev_item = items[0]
count = 1
for item in items[1:]:
if prev_item == item:
count += 1
else:
yield (prev_item, count)
count = 1
prev_item = item
yield (item, count)
return
import unittest
class TestListCounters(unittest.TestCase):
def test_count_unsorted_list_items(self):
D = (
([], []),
([2], [(2,1)]),
([2,2], [(2,2)]),
([2,2,2,2,3,3,5,5], [(2,4), (3,2), (5,2)]),
)
for inp, exp_outp in D:
counts = count_unsorted_list_items(inp)
print inp, exp_outp, counts
self.assertEqual(counts, dict( exp_outp ))
inp, exp_outp = UNSORTED_WIN = ([2,2,4,2], [(2,3), (4,1)])
self.assertEqual(dict( exp_outp ), count_unsorted_list_items(inp) )
def test_count_sorted_list_items(self):
D = (
([], []),
([2], [(2,1)]),
([2,2], [(2,2)]),
([2,2,2,2,3,3,5,5], [(2,4), (3,2), (5,2)]),
)
for inp, exp_outp in D:
counts = list( count_sorted_list_items(inp) )
print inp, exp_outp, counts
self.assertEqual(counts, exp_outp)
inp, exp_outp = UNSORTED_FAIL = ([2,2,4,2], [(2,3), (4,1)])
self.assertEqual(exp_outp, list( count_sorted_list_items(inp) ))
# ... [(2,2), (4,1), (2,1)]
# Python >= 2.6 (defaultdict) && < 2.7 (Counter, OrderedDict)
from collections import defaultdict
def count_unsorted_list_items(items):
"""
:param items: iterable of hashable items to count
:type items: iterable
:returns: dict of counts like Py2.7 Counter
:rtype: dict
"""
counts = defaultdict(int)
for item in items:
counts[item] += 1
return dict(counts)
# Python >= 2.2 (generators)
def count_sorted_list_items(items):
"""
:param items: sorted iterable of items to count
:type items: sorted iterable
:returns: generator of (item, count) tuples
:rtype: generator
"""
if not items:
return
elif len(items) == 1:
yield (items[0], 1)
return
prev_item = items[0]
count = 1
for item in items[1:]:
if prev_item == item:
count += 1
else:
yield (prev_item, count)
count = 1
prev_item = item
yield (item, count)
return
import unittest
class TestListCounters(unittest.TestCase):
def test_count_unsorted_list_items(self):
D = (
([], []),
([2], [(2,1)]),
([2,2], [(2,2)]),
([2,2,2,2,3,3,5,5], [(2,4), (3,2), (5,2)]),
)
for inp, exp_outp in D:
counts = count_unsorted_list_items(inp)
print inp, exp_outp, counts
self.assertEqual(counts, dict( exp_outp ))
inp, exp_outp = UNSORTED_WIN = ([2,2,4,2], [(2,3), (4,1)])
self.assertEqual(dict( exp_outp ), count_unsorted_list_items(inp) )
def test_count_sorted_list_items(self):
D = (
([], []),
([2], [(2,1)]),
([2,2], [(2,2)]),
([2,2,2,2,3,3,5,5], [(2,4), (3,2), (5,2)]),
)
for inp, exp_outp in D:
counts = list( count_sorted_list_items(inp) )
print inp, exp_outp, counts
self.assertEqual(counts, exp_outp)
inp, exp_outp = UNSORTED_FAIL = ([2,2,4,2], [(2,3), (4,1)])
self.assertEqual(exp_outp, list( count_sorted_list_items(inp) ))
# ... [(2,2), (4,1), (2,1)]
回答 12
以下是三种解决方案：
最快的是使用for循环并将其存储在Dict中。
import time
from collections import Counter
def countElement(a):
g = {}
for i in a:
if i in g:
g[i] +=1
else:
g[i] =1
return g
z = [1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,4,5,5,234,23,3,12,3,123,12,31,23,13,2,4,23,42,42,34,234,23,42,34,23,423,42,34,23,423,4,234,23,42,34,23,4,23,423,4,23,4]
#Solution 1 - Faster
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
b = countElement(z)
et = time.monotonic()
print(b)
print('Simple for loop and storing it in dict - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
#Solution 2 - Fast
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
a = Counter(z)
et = time.monotonic()
print (a)
print('Using collections.Counter - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
#Solution 3 - Slow
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
g = dict([(i, z.count(i)) for i in set(z)])
et = time.monotonic()
print(g)
print('Using list comprehension - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
结果
#Solution 1 - Faster
{1: 4, 2: 5, 3: 4, 4: 6, 5: 2, 234: 3, 23: 10, 12: 2, 123: 1, 31: 1, 13: 1, 42: 5, 34: 4, 423: 3}
Simple for loop and storing it in dict - Duration: 12.032000000000153
#Solution 2 - Fast
Counter({23: 10, 4: 6, 2: 5, 42: 5, 1: 4, 3: 4, 34: 4, 234: 3, 423: 3, 5: 2, 12: 2, 123: 1, 31: 1, 13: 1})
Using collections.Counter - Duration: 15.889999999999418
#Solution 3 - Slow
{1: 4, 2: 5, 3: 4, 4: 6, 5: 2, 34: 4, 423: 3, 234: 3, 42: 5, 12: 2, 13: 1, 23: 10, 123: 1, 31: 1}
Using list comprehension - Duration: 33.0
Below are the three solutions:
Fastest is using a for loop and storing it in a Dict.
import time
from collections import Counter
def countElement(a):
g = {}
for i in a:
if i in g:
g[i] +=1
else:
g[i] =1
return g
z = [1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,4,5,5,234,23,3,12,3,123,12,31,23,13,2,4,23,42,42,34,234,23,42,34,23,423,42,34,23,423,4,234,23,42,34,23,4,23,423,4,23,4]
#Solution 1 - Faster
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
b = countElement(z)
et = time.monotonic()
print(b)
print('Simple for loop and storing it in dict - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
#Solution 2 - Fast
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
a = Counter(z)
et = time.monotonic()
print (a)
print('Using collections.Counter - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
#Solution 3 - Slow
st = time.monotonic()
for i in range(1000000):
g = dict([(i, z.count(i)) for i in set(z)])
et = time.monotonic()
print(g)
print('Using list comprehension - Duration: {}'.format(et - st))
Result
#Solution 1 - Faster
{1: 4, 2: 5, 3: 4, 4: 6, 5: 2, 234: 3, 23: 10, 12: 2, 123: 1, 31: 1, 13: 1, 42: 5, 34: 4, 423: 3}
Simple for loop and storing it in dict - Duration: 12.032000000000153
#Solution 2 - Fast
Counter({23: 10, 4: 6, 2: 5, 42: 5, 1: 4, 3: 4, 34: 4, 234: 3, 423: 3, 5: 2, 12: 2, 123: 1, 31: 1, 13: 1})
Using collections.Counter - Duration: 15.889999999999418
#Solution 3 - Slow
{1: 4, 2: 5, 3: 4, 4: 6, 5: 2, 34: 4, 423: 3, 234: 3, 42: 5, 12: 2, 13: 1, 23: 10, 123: 1, 31: 1}
Using list comprehension - Duration: 33.0
回答 13
所有元素的计数 itertools.groupby()
获取列表中所有元素的计数的另一种可能性是使用itertools.groupby()。
具有“重复”计数
from itertools import groupby
L = ['a', 'a', 'a', 't', 'q', 'a', 'd', 'a', 'd', 'c'] # Input list
counts = [(i, len(list(c))) for i,c in groupby(L)] # Create value-count pairs as list of tuples
print(counts)
退货
[('a', 3), ('t', 1), ('q', 1), ('a', 1), ('d', 1), ('a', 1), ('d', 1), ('c', 1)]
请注意，它是如何将前三个组合在一起a作为第一组的，而其他组合a则位于列表的下方。发生这种情况是因为未对输入列表L进行排序。如果组实际上应该分开，那么有时这可能是一个好处。
具有独特的计数
如果需要唯一的组计数，只需对输入列表进行排序：
counts = [(i, len(list(c))) for i,c in groupby(sorted(L))]
print(counts)
退货
[('a', 5), ('c', 1), ('d', 2), ('q', 1), ('t', 1)]
注意：为了创建唯一计数，与groupby解决方案相比，许多其他答案都提供了更轻松，更易读的代码。但是这里显示它与重复计数示例相似。
Count of all elements with itertools.groupby()
Antoher possiblity for getting the count of all elements in the list could be by means of itertools.groupby().
With “duplicate” counts
from itertools import groupby
L = ['a', 'a', 'a', 't', 'q', 'a', 'd', 'a', 'd', 'c'] # Input list
counts = [(i, len(list(c))) for i,c in groupby(L)] # Create value-count pairs as list of tuples
print(counts)
Returns
[('a', 3), ('t', 1), ('q', 1), ('a', 1), ('d', 1), ('a', 1), ('d', 1), ('c', 1)]
Notice how it combined the first three a‘s as the first group, while other groups of a are present further down the list. This happens because the input list L was not sorted. This can be a benefit sometimes if the groups should in fact be separate.
With unique counts
If unique group counts are desired, just sort the input list:
counts = [(i, len(list(c))) for i,c in groupby(sorted(L))]
print(counts)
Returns
[('a', 5), ('c', 1), ('d', 2), ('q', 1), ('t', 1)]
Note: For creating unique counts, many of the other answers provide easier and more readable code compared to the groupby solution. But it is shown here to draw a parallel to the duplicate count example.
回答 14
建议使用numpy的bincount，但是它仅适用于具有非负整数的一维数组。此外，结果数组可能会造成混淆（它包含原始列表的最小值到最大值的整数的出现，并将丢失的整数设置为0）。
使用numpy更好的方法是使用属性设置为True 的唯一函数return_counts。它返回一个元组，该元组具有唯一值的数组和每个唯一值的出现的数组。
# a = [1, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 3, 3]
a_uniq, counts = np.unique(a, return_counts=True) # array([0, 1, 2, 3]), array([2, 3, 1, 2]
然后我们可以将它们配对为
dict(zip(a_uniq, counts)) # {0: 2, 1: 3, 2: 1, 3: 2}
它还可以与其他数据类型和“ 2d列表”一起使用，例如
>>> a = [['a', 'b', 'b', 'b'], ['a', 'c', 'c', 'a']]
>>> dict(zip(*np.unique(a, return_counts=True)))
{'a': 3, 'b': 3, 'c': 2}
It was suggested to use numpy’s bincount, however it works only for 1d arrays with non-negative integers. Also, the resulting array might be confusing (it contains the occurrences of the integers from min to max of the original list, and sets to 0 the missing integers).
A better way to do it with numpy is to use the unique function with the attribute return_counts set to True. It returns a tuple with an array of the unique values and an array of the occurrences of each unique value.
# a = [1, 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 3, 3]
a_uniq, counts = np.unique(a, return_counts=True) # array([0, 1, 2, 3]), array([2, 3, 1, 2]
and then we can pair them as
dict(zip(a_uniq, counts)) # {0: 2, 1: 3, 2: 1, 3: 2}
It also works with other data types and “2d lists”, e.g.
>>> a = [['a', 'b', 'b', 'b'], ['a', 'c', 'c', 'a']]
>>> dict(zip(*np.unique(a, return_counts=True)))
{'a': 3, 'b': 3, 'c': 2}
回答 15
计算具有共同类型的各种元素的数量：
li = ['A0','c5','A8','A2','A5','c2','A3','A9']
print sum(1 for el in li if el[0]=='A' and el[1] in '01234')
给
3 ，而不是6
To count the number of diverse elements having a common type:
li = ['A0','c5','A8','A2','A5','c2','A3','A9']
print sum(1 for el in li if el[0]=='A' and el[1] in '01234')
gives
3 , not 6
回答 16
虽然这是一个非常古老的问题，但是由于我没有找到一支，所以我做了一支。
# original numbers in list
l = [1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4]
# empty dictionary to hold pair of number and its count
d = {}
# loop through all elements and store count
[ d.update( {i:d.get(i, 0)+1} ) for i in l ]
print(d)
Although it is very old question, but as i didn’t find a one liner, i made one.
# original numbers in list
l = [1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4]
# empty dictionary to hold pair of number and its count
d = {}
# loop through all elements and store count
[ d.update( {i:d.get(i, 0)+1} ) for i in l ]
print(d)
回答 17
您也可以使用countOf内置模块的方法operator。
>>> import operator
>>> operator.countOf([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1], 1)
3
You can also use countOf method of a built-in module operator.
>>> import operator
>>> operator.countOf([1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1], 1)
3
回答 18
可能不是最有效的，需要额外的通行证才能删除重复项。
功能实现：
arr = np.array(['a','a','b','b','b','c'])
print(set(map(lambda x : (x , list(arr).count(x)) , arr)))
返回：
{('c', 1), ('b', 3), ('a', 2)}
或返回为dict：
print(dict(map(lambda x : (x , list(arr).count(x)) , arr)))
返回：
{'b': 3, 'c': 1, 'a': 2}
May not be the most efficient, requires an extra pass to remove duplicates.
Functional implementation :
arr = np.array(['a','a','b','b','b','c'])
print(set(map(lambda x : (x , list(arr).count(x)) , arr)))
returns :
{('c', 1), ('b', 3), ('a', 2)}
or return as dict :
print(dict(map(lambda x : (x , list(arr).count(x)) , arr)))
returns :
{'b': 3, 'c': 1, 'a': 2}
回答 19
sum([1 for elem in <yourlist> if elem==<your_value>])
这将返回your_value的出现次数
sum([1 for elem in <yourlist> if elem==<your_value>])
This will return the amount of occurences of your_value
回答 20
我将使用filter()Lukasz的示例：
>>> lst = [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1]
>>> len(filter(lambda x: x==1, lst))
3
I would use filter(), take Lukasz’s example:
>>> lst = [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 1]
>>> len(filter(lambda x: x==1, lst))
3
回答 21
如果您希望特定元素出现多次：
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> z = ['blue', 'red', 'blue', 'yellow', 'blue', 'red']
>>> single_occurrences = Counter(z)
>>> print(single_occurrences.get("blue"))
3
>>> print(single_occurrences.values())
dict_values([3, 2, 1])
if you want a number of occurrences for the particular element:
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> z = ['blue', 'red', 'blue', 'yellow', 'blue', 'red']
>>> single_occurrences = Counter(z)
>>> print(single_occurrences.get("blue"))
3
>>> print(single_occurrences.values())
dict_values([3, 2, 1])
回答 22
def countfrequncyinarray(arr1):
r=len(arr1)
return {i:arr1.count(i) for i in range(1,r+1)}
arr1=[4,4,4,4]
a=countfrequncyinarray(arr1)
print(a)
def countfrequncyinarray(arr1):
r=len(arr1)
return {i:arr1.count(i) for i in range(1,r+1)}
arr1=[4,4,4,4]
a=countfrequncyinarray(arr1)
print(a)
回答 23
l2=[1,"feto",["feto",1,["feto"]],['feto',[1,2,3,['feto']]]]
count=0
def Test(l):
global count
if len(l)==0:
return count
count=l.count("feto")
for i in l:
if type(i) is list:
count+=Test(i)
return count
print(Test(l2))
这将递归计数或搜索列表中的项目，即使它在列表列表中
l2=[1,"feto",["feto",1,["feto"]],['feto',[1,2,3,['feto']]]]
count=0
def Test(l):
global count
if len(l)==0:
return count
count=l.count("feto")
for i in l:
if type(i) is list:
count+=Test(i)
return count
print(Test(l2))
this will recursive count or search for the item in the list even if it in list of lists
