问题:向现有对象实例添加方法
我读过,可以在Python中向现有对象(即不在类定义中)添加方法。
我了解这样做并不总是一件好事。但是怎么可能呢?
I’ve read that it is possible to add a method to an existing object (i.e., not in the class definition) in Python.
I understand that it’s not always good to do so. But how might one do this?
回答 0
在Python中,函数和绑定方法之间存在差异。
>>> def foo():
... print "foo"
...
>>> class A:
... def bar( self ):
... print "bar"
...
>>> a = A()
>>> foo
<function foo at 0x00A98D70>
>>> a.bar
<bound method A.bar of <__main__.A instance at 0x00A9BC88>>
>>>
绑定方法已“绑定”(具有描述性)到实例,并且只要调用该方法,该实例将作为第一个参数传递。
但是,作为类(而不是实例)的属性的可调用对象仍未绑定,因此您可以在需要时修改类定义:
>>> def fooFighters( self ):
... print "fooFighters"
...
>>> A.fooFighters = fooFighters
>>> a2 = A()
>>> a2.fooFighters
<bound method A.fooFighters of <__main__.A instance at 0x00A9BEB8>>
>>> a2.fooFighters()
fooFighters
先前定义的实例也会被更新(只要它们本身没有覆盖属性):
>>> a.fooFighters()
fooFighters
当您要将方法附加到单个实例时,就会出现问题:
>>> def barFighters( self ):
... print "barFighters"
...
>>> a.barFighters = barFighters
>>> a.barFighters()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: barFighters() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given)
该函数直接附加到实例时不会自动绑定:
>>> a.barFighters
<function barFighters at 0x00A98EF0>
要绑定它,我们可以在类型模块中使用MethodType函数:
>>> import types
>>> a.barFighters = types.MethodType( barFighters, a )
>>> a.barFighters
<bound method ?.barFighters of <__main__.A instance at 0x00A9BC88>>
>>> a.barFighters()
barFighters
这次,该类的其他实例没有受到影响:
>>> a2.barFighters()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: A instance has no attribute 'barFighters'
通过阅读有关描述符和元类 编程的信息,可以找到更多信息。
In Python, there is a difference between functions and bound methods.
>>> def foo():
... print "foo"
...
>>> class A:
... def bar( self ):
... print "bar"
...
>>> a = A()
>>> foo
<function foo at 0x00A98D70>
>>> a.bar
<bound method A.bar of <__main__.A instance at 0x00A9BC88>>
>>>
Bound methods have been “bound” (how descriptive) to an instance, and that instance will be passed as the first argument whenever the method is called.
Callables that are attributes of a class (as opposed to an instance) are still unbound, though, so you can modify the class definition whenever you want:
>>> def fooFighters( self ):
... print "fooFighters"
...
>>> A.fooFighters = fooFighters
>>> a2 = A()
>>> a2.fooFighters
<bound method A.fooFighters of <__main__.A instance at 0x00A9BEB8>>
>>> a2.fooFighters()
fooFighters
Previously defined instances are updated as well (as long as they haven’t overridden the attribute themselves):
>>> a.fooFighters()
fooFighters
The problem comes when you want to attach a method to a single instance:
>>> def barFighters( self ):
... print "barFighters"
...
>>> a.barFighters = barFighters
>>> a.barFighters()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: barFighters() takes exactly 1 argument (0 given)
The function is not automatically bound when it’s attached directly to an instance:
>>> a.barFighters
<function barFighters at 0x00A98EF0>
To bind it, we can use the MethodType function in the types module:
>>> import types
>>> a.barFighters = types.MethodType( barFighters, a )
>>> a.barFighters
<bound method ?.barFighters of <__main__.A instance at 0x00A9BC88>>
>>> a.barFighters()
barFighters
This time other instances of the class have not been affected:
>>> a2.barFighters()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: A instance has no attribute 'barFighters'
More information can be found by reading about descriptors and metaclass programming.
回答 1
自python 2.6起不推荐使用new模块,并在3.0版中将其删除,请使用类型
参见http://docs.python.org/library/new.html
在下面的示例中,我故意从patch_me()
函数中删除了返回值。我认为提供返回值可能会使人相信patch返回了一个新对象,这是不正确的-它修改了传入的对象。可能这可以促进对Monkey补丁的更严格的使用。
import types
class A(object):#but seems to work for old style objects too
pass
def patch_me(target):
def method(target,x):
print "x=",x
print "called from", target
target.method = types.MethodType(method,target)
#add more if needed
a = A()
print a
#out: <__main__.A object at 0x2b73ac88bfd0>
patch_me(a) #patch instance
a.method(5)
#out: x= 5
#out: called from <__main__.A object at 0x2b73ac88bfd0>
patch_me(A)
A.method(6) #can patch class too
#out: x= 6
#out: called from <class '__main__.A'>
Module new is deprecated since python 2.6 and removed in 3.0, use types
see http://docs.python.org/library/new.html
In the example below I’ve deliberately removed return value from patch_me()
function.
I think that giving return value may make one believe that patch returns a new object, which is not true – it modifies the incoming one. Probably this can facilitate a more disciplined use of monkeypatching.
import types
class A(object):#but seems to work for old style objects too
pass
def patch_me(target):
def method(target,x):
print "x=",x
print "called from", target
target.method = types.MethodType(method,target)
#add more if needed
a = A()
print a
#out: <__main__.A object at 0x2b73ac88bfd0>
patch_me(a) #patch instance
a.method(5)
#out: x= 5
#out: called from <__main__.A object at 0x2b73ac88bfd0>
patch_me(A)
A.method(6) #can patch class too
#out: x= 6
#out: called from <class '__main__.A'>
回答 2
前言-有关兼容性的说明:其他答案可能仅在Python 2中有效-此答案在Python 2和3中应该可以很好地工作。如果仅编写Python 3,则可能会显式地继承自object
,但是代码应保持不变。
向现有对象实例添加方法
我读过,可以在Python中向现有对象(例如不在类定义中)添加方法。
我了解这样做并非总是一个好的决定。但是,怎么可能呢?
是的,有可能-但不建议
我不建议这样做。这是一个坏主意。不要这样
这有两个原因:
- 您将向执行此操作的每个实例添加一个绑定对象。如果您经常这样做,则可能会浪费大量内存。通常仅在调用的短时间内创建绑定方法,然后在自动垃圾回收时它们不再存在。如果手动执行此操作,则将具有一个引用绑定方法的名称绑定-这将防止使用时对其进行垃圾回收。
- 给定类型的对象实例通常在该类型的所有对象上都有其方法。如果在其他位置添加方法,则某些实例将具有那些方法,而其他实例则不会。程序员不会期望如此,您可能会违反最不惊奇的规则。
- 由于还有其他非常好的理由不这样做,因此,如果这样做,您的声誉也会很差。
因此,我建议您除非有充分的理由,否则不要这样做。这是更好的在类定义来定义的正确方法或更少的类直接优选猴的贴剂,是这样的:
Foo.sample_method = sample_method
由于具有指导意义,因此,我将向您展示一些这样做的方法。
怎么做
这是一些设置代码。我们需要一个类定义。可以将其导入,但这并不重要。
class Foo(object):
'''An empty class to demonstrate adding a method to an instance'''
创建一个实例:
foo = Foo()
创建一个添加方法:
def sample_method(self, bar, baz):
print(bar + baz)
方法零(0)-使用描述符方法, __get__
在函数上进行的点分查找__get__
使用实例调用函数的方法,将对象绑定到该方法,从而创建“绑定方法”。
foo.sample_method = sample_method.__get__(foo)
现在:
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
方法一-types.MethodType
首先,导入类型,从中我们将获得方法构造函数:
import types
现在我们将方法添加到实例中。为此,我们需要types
模块(上面已导入)中的MethodType构造函数。
types.MethodType的参数签名为(function, instance, class)
:
foo.sample_method = types.MethodType(sample_method, foo, Foo)
和用法:
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
方法二:词法绑定
首先,我们创建一个包装器函数,将方法绑定到实例:
def bind(instance, method):
def binding_scope_fn(*args, **kwargs):
return method(instance, *args, **kwargs)
return binding_scope_fn
用法:
>>> foo.sample_method = bind(foo, sample_method)
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
方法三:functools.partial
局部函数将第一个参数应用于函数(以及可选的关键字参数),以后可以与其余参数(以及覆盖的关键字参数)一起调用。从而:
>>> from functools import partial
>>> foo.sample_method = partial(sample_method, foo)
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
当您认为绑定方法是实例的部分功能时,这很有意义。
未绑定函数作为对象属性-为什么不起作用:
如果尝试以与将其添加到类中相同的方式添加sample_method,则它不受实例约束,并且不会将隐式self作为第一个参数。
>>> foo.sample_method = sample_method
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: sample_method() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
我们可以通过显式传递实例(或其他任何方法,因为此方法实际上不使用self
参数变量)来使未绑定函数起作用,但是它将与其他实例的预期签名不一致(如果我们进行了Monkey修补)此实例):
>>> foo.sample_method(foo, 1, 2)
3
结论
现在,您知道可以执行此操作的几种方法,但是,认真地说-不要这样做。
Preface – a note on compatibility: other answers may only work in Python 2 – this answer should work perfectly well in Python 2 and 3. If writing Python 3 only, you might leave out explicitly inheriting from object
, but otherwise the code should remain the same.
Adding a Method to an Existing Object Instance
I’ve read that it is possible to add a method to an existing object (e.g. not in the class definition) in Python.
I understand that it’s not always a good decision to do so. But, how might one do this?
Yes, it is possible – But not recommended
I don’t recommend this. This is a bad idea. Don’t do it.
Here’s a couple of reasons:
- You’ll add a bound object to every instance you do this to. If you do this a lot, you’ll probably waste a lot of memory. Bound methods are typically only created for the short duration of their call, and they then cease to exist when automatically garbage collected. If you do this manually, you’ll have a name binding referencing the bound method – which will prevent its garbage collection on usage.
- Object instances of a given type generally have its methods on all objects of that type. If you add methods elsewhere, some instances will have those methods and others will not. Programmers will not expect this, and you risk violating the rule of least surprise.
- Since there are other really good reasons not to do this, you’ll additionally give yourself a poor reputation if you do it.
Thus, I suggest that you not do this unless you have a really good reason. It is far better to define the correct method in the class definition or less preferably to monkey-patch the class directly, like this:
Foo.sample_method = sample_method
Since it’s instructive, however, I’m going to show you some ways of doing this.
How it can be done
Here’s some setup code. We need a class definition. It could be imported, but it really doesn’t matter.
class Foo(object):
'''An empty class to demonstrate adding a method to an instance'''
Create an instance:
foo = Foo()
Create a method to add to it:
def sample_method(self, bar, baz):
print(bar + baz)
Method nought (0) – use the descriptor method, __get__
Dotted lookups on functions call the __get__
method of the function with the instance, binding the object to the method and thus creating a “bound method.”
foo.sample_method = sample_method.__get__(foo)
and now:
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
Method one – types.MethodType
First, import types, from which we’ll get the method constructor:
import types
Now we add the method to the instance. To do this, we require the MethodType constructor from the types
module (which we imported above).
The argument signature for types.MethodType is (function, instance, class)
:
foo.sample_method = types.MethodType(sample_method, foo, Foo)
and usage:
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
Method two: lexical binding
First, we create a wrapper function that binds the method to the instance:
def bind(instance, method):
def binding_scope_fn(*args, **kwargs):
return method(instance, *args, **kwargs)
return binding_scope_fn
usage:
>>> foo.sample_method = bind(foo, sample_method)
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
Method three: functools.partial
A partial function applies the first argument(s) to a function (and optionally keyword arguments), and can later be called with the remaining arguments (and overriding keyword arguments). Thus:
>>> from functools import partial
>>> foo.sample_method = partial(sample_method, foo)
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
3
This makes sense when you consider that bound methods are partial functions of the instance.
Unbound function as an object attribute – why this doesn’t work:
If we try to add the sample_method in the same way as we might add it to the class, it is unbound from the instance, and doesn’t take the implicit self as the first argument.
>>> foo.sample_method = sample_method
>>> foo.sample_method(1,2)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: sample_method() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
We can make the unbound function work by explicitly passing the instance (or anything, since this method doesn’t actually use the self
argument variable), but it would not be consistent with the expected signature of other instances (if we’re monkey-patching this instance):
>>> foo.sample_method(foo, 1, 2)
3
Conclusion
You now know several ways you could do this, but in all seriousness – don’t do this.
回答 3
我认为以上答案错过了关键点。
让我们来一个带有方法的类:
class A(object):
def m(self):
pass
现在,让我们在ipython中玩它:
In [2]: A.m
Out[2]: <unbound method A.m>
好的,因此m()以某种方式成为A的未绑定方法。但是真的是那样吗?
In [5]: A.__dict__['m']
Out[5]: <function m at 0xa66b8b4>
事实证明,m()只是一个函数,对它的引用已添加到A类字典中-没有魔术。那为什么我要给我们一个不受约束的方法?这是因为该点未转换为简单的字典查找。实际上是A .__ class __.__ getattribute __(A,’m’)的调用:
In [11]: class MetaA(type):
....: def __getattribute__(self, attr_name):
....: print str(self), '-', attr_name
In [12]: class A(object):
....: __metaclass__ = MetaA
In [23]: A.m
<class '__main__.A'> - m
<class '__main__.A'> - m
现在,我不确定为什么最后一行要打印两次,但是仍然很清楚那里发生了什么。
现在,默认的__getattribute__所做的是检查属性是否为所谓的描述符,即,是否实现了特殊的__get__方法。如果实现该方法,则返回该__get__方法的结果。回到我们的A类的第一个版本,这是我们拥有的:
In [28]: A.__dict__['m'].__get__(None, A)
Out[28]: <unbound method A.m>
而且由于Python函数实现了描述符协议,所以如果它们代表一个对象被调用,它们将通过__get__方法将自身绑定到该对象。
好的,如何为现有对象添加方法?假设您不介意修补类,那么它很简单:
B.m = m
然后,借助描述符魔术,Bm “成为”一个不受约束的方法。
而且,如果您只想向单个对象添加方法,则必须使用types.MethodType来自己模拟机制。
b.m = types.MethodType(m, b)
顺便说说:
In [2]: A.m
Out[2]: <unbound method A.m>
In [59]: type(A.m)
Out[59]: <type 'instancemethod'>
In [60]: type(b.m)
Out[60]: <type 'instancemethod'>
In [61]: types.MethodType
Out[61]: <type 'instancemethod'>
I think that the above answers missed the key point.
Let’s have a class with a method:
class A(object):
def m(self):
pass
Now, let’s play with it in ipython:
In [2]: A.m
Out[2]: <unbound method A.m>
Ok, so m() somehow becomes an unbound method of A. But is it really like that?
In [5]: A.__dict__['m']
Out[5]: <function m at 0xa66b8b4>
It turns out that m() is just a function, reference to which is added to A class dictionary – there’s no magic. Then why A.m gives us an unbound method? It’s because the dot is not translated to a simple dictionary lookup. It’s de facto a call of A.__class__.__getattribute__(A, ‘m’):
In [11]: class MetaA(type):
....: def __getattribute__(self, attr_name):
....: print str(self), '-', attr_name
In [12]: class A(object):
....: __metaclass__ = MetaA
In [23]: A.m
<class '__main__.A'> - m
<class '__main__.A'> - m
Now, I’m not sure out of the top of my head why the last line is printed twice, but still it’s clear what’s going on there.
Now, what the default __getattribute__ does is that it checks if the attribute is a so-called descriptor or not, i.e. if it implements a special __get__ method. If it implements that method, then what is returned is the result of calling that __get__ method. Going back to the first version of our A class, this is what we have:
In [28]: A.__dict__['m'].__get__(None, A)
Out[28]: <unbound method A.m>
And because Python functions implement the descriptor protocol, if they are called on behalf of an object, they bind themselves to that object in their __get__ method.
Ok, so how to add a method to an existing object? Assuming you don’t mind patching class, it’s as simple as:
B.m = m
Then B.m “becomes” an unbound method, thanks to the descriptor magic.
And if you want to add a method just to a single object, then you have to emulate the machinery yourself, by using types.MethodType:
b.m = types.MethodType(m, b)
By the way:
In [2]: A.m
Out[2]: <unbound method A.m>
In [59]: type(A.m)
Out[59]: <type 'instancemethod'>
In [60]: type(b.m)
Out[60]: <type 'instancemethod'>
In [61]: types.MethodType
Out[61]: <type 'instancemethod'>
回答 4
在Python中,Monkey修补通常通过覆盖您自己的类或函数签名来起作用。以下是Zope Wiki的示例:
from SomeOtherProduct.SomeModule import SomeClass
def speak(self):
return "ook ook eee eee eee!"
SomeClass.speak = speak
该代码将覆盖/创建一个在类上称为“讲话”的方法。在杰夫·阿特伍德(Jeff Atwood)最近关于Monkey修补的文章中。他显示了C#3.0中的示例,这是我在工作中使用的当前语言。
In Python monkey patching generally works by overwriting a class or functions signature with your own. Below is an example from the Zope Wiki:
from SomeOtherProduct.SomeModule import SomeClass
def speak(self):
return "ook ook eee eee eee!"
SomeClass.speak = speak
That code will overwrite/create a method called speak on the class. In Jeff Atwood’s recent post on monkey patching. He shows an example in C# 3.0 which is the current language I use for work.
回答 5
您可以使用lambda将方法绑定到实例:
def run(self):
print self._instanceString
class A(object):
def __init__(self):
self._instanceString = "This is instance string"
a = A()
a.run = lambda: run(a)
a.run()
输出:
This is instance string
You can use lambda to bind a method to an instance:
def run(self):
print self._instanceString
class A(object):
def __init__(self):
self._instanceString = "This is instance string"
a = A()
a.run = lambda: run(a)
a.run()
Output:
This is instance string
回答 6
没有至少一种方法可以将方法附加到实例types.MethodType
:
>>> class A:
... def m(self):
... print 'im m, invoked with: ', self
>>> a = A()
>>> a.m()
im m, invoked with: <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>
>>> a.m
<bound method A.m of <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>>
>>>
>>> def foo(firstargument):
... print 'im foo, invoked with: ', firstargument
>>> foo
<function foo at 0x978548c>
1:
>>> a.foo = foo.__get__(a, A) # or foo.__get__(a, type(a))
>>> a.foo()
im foo, invoked with: <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>
>>> a.foo
<bound method A.foo of <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>>
2:
>>> instancemethod = type(A.m)
>>> instancemethod
<type 'instancemethod'>
>>> a.foo2 = instancemethod(foo, a, type(a))
>>> a.foo2()
im foo, invoked with: <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>
>>> a.foo2
<bound method instance.foo of <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>>
有用的链接:
数据模型-调用描述符描述
符方法指南-调用描述符
There are at least two ways for attach a method to an instance without types.MethodType
:
>>> class A:
... def m(self):
... print 'im m, invoked with: ', self
>>> a = A()
>>> a.m()
im m, invoked with: <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>
>>> a.m
<bound method A.m of <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>>
>>>
>>> def foo(firstargument):
... print 'im foo, invoked with: ', firstargument
>>> foo
<function foo at 0x978548c>
1:
>>> a.foo = foo.__get__(a, A) # or foo.__get__(a, type(a))
>>> a.foo()
im foo, invoked with: <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>
>>> a.foo
<bound method A.foo of <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>>
2:
>>> instancemethod = type(A.m)
>>> instancemethod
<type 'instancemethod'>
>>> a.foo2 = instancemethod(foo, a, type(a))
>>> a.foo2()
im foo, invoked with: <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>
>>> a.foo2
<bound method instance.foo of <__main__.A instance at 0x973ec6c>>
Useful links:
Data model – invoking descriptors
Descriptor HowTo Guide – invoking descriptors
回答 7
setattr
我相信您在寻找什么。使用此设置对象上的属性。
>>> def printme(s): print repr(s)
>>> class A: pass
>>> setattr(A,'printme',printme)
>>> a = A()
>>> a.printme() # s becomes the implicit 'self' variable
< __ main __ . A instance at 0xABCDEFG>
What you’re looking for is setattr
I believe.
Use this to set an attribute on an object.
>>> def printme(s): print repr(s)
>>> class A: pass
>>> setattr(A,'printme',printme)
>>> a = A()
>>> a.printme() # s becomes the implicit 'self' variable
< __ main __ . A instance at 0xABCDEFG>
回答 8
由于此问题要求使用非Python版本,因此以下是JavaScript:
a.methodname = function () { console.log("Yay, a new method!") }
Since this question asked for non-Python versions, here’s JavaScript:
a.methodname = function () { console.log("Yay, a new method!") }
回答 9
通过查看不同绑定方法的结果,合并Jason Pratt和社区Wiki的答案:
尤其要注意将绑定函数添加为类方法的工作原理,但是引用范围不正确。
#!/usr/bin/python -u
import types
import inspect
## dynamically adding methods to a unique instance of a class
# get a list of a class's method type attributes
def listattr(c):
for m in [(n, v) for n, v in inspect.getmembers(c, inspect.ismethod) if isinstance(v,types.MethodType)]:
print m[0], m[1]
# externally bind a function as a method of an instance of a class
def ADDMETHOD(c, method, name):
c.__dict__[name] = types.MethodType(method, c)
class C():
r = 10 # class attribute variable to test bound scope
def __init__(self):
pass
#internally bind a function as a method of self's class -- note that this one has issues!
def addmethod(self, method, name):
self.__dict__[name] = types.MethodType( method, self.__class__ )
# predfined function to compare with
def f0(self, x):
print 'f0\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r)
a = C() # created before modified instnace
b = C() # modified instnace
def f1(self, x): # bind internally
print 'f1\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
def f2( self, x): # add to class instance's .__dict__ as method type
print 'f2\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
def f3( self, x): # assign to class as method type
print 'f3\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
def f4( self, x): # add to class instance's .__dict__ using a general function
print 'f4\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
b.addmethod(f1, 'f1')
b.__dict__['f2'] = types.MethodType( f2, b)
b.f3 = types.MethodType( f3, b)
ADDMETHOD(b, f4, 'f4')
b.f0(0) # OUT: f0 x = 0 r = 10
b.f1(1) # OUT: f1 x = 1 r = 10
b.f2(2) # OUT: f2 x = 2 r = 10
b.f3(3) # OUT: f3 x = 3 r = 10
b.f4(4) # OUT: f4 x = 4 r = 10
k = 2
print 'changing b.r from {0} to {1}'.format(b.r, k)
b.r = k
print 'new b.r = {0}'.format(b.r)
b.f0(0) # OUT: f0 x = 0 r = 2
b.f1(1) # OUT: f1 x = 1 r = 10 !!!!!!!!!
b.f2(2) # OUT: f2 x = 2 r = 2
b.f3(3) # OUT: f3 x = 3 r = 2
b.f4(4) # OUT: f4 x = 4 r = 2
c = C() # created after modifying instance
# let's have a look at each instance's method type attributes
print '\nattributes of a:'
listattr(a)
# OUT:
# attributes of a:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FD88>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FD88>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FD88>>
print '\nattributes of b:'
listattr(b)
# OUT:
# attributes of b:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f1 <bound method ?.f1 of <class __main__.C at 0x000000000237AB28>>
# f2 <bound method ?.f2 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f3 <bound method ?.f3 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f4 <bound method ?.f4 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
print '\nattributes of c:'
listattr(c)
# OUT:
# attributes of c:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002313108>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002313108>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002313108>>
就个人而言,我更喜欢使用外部ADDMETHOD函数路由,因为它也允许我在迭代器中动态分配新的方法名称。
def y(self, x):
pass
d = C()
for i in range(1,5):
ADDMETHOD(d, y, 'f%d' % i)
print '\nattributes of d:'
listattr(d)
# OUT:
# attributes of d:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f1 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f2 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f3 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f4 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
Consolidating Jason Pratt’s and the community wiki answers, with a look at the results of different methods of binding:
Especially note how adding the binding function as a class method works, but the referencing scope is incorrect.
#!/usr/bin/python -u
import types
import inspect
## dynamically adding methods to a unique instance of a class
# get a list of a class's method type attributes
def listattr(c):
for m in [(n, v) for n, v in inspect.getmembers(c, inspect.ismethod) if isinstance(v,types.MethodType)]:
print m[0], m[1]
# externally bind a function as a method of an instance of a class
def ADDMETHOD(c, method, name):
c.__dict__[name] = types.MethodType(method, c)
class C():
r = 10 # class attribute variable to test bound scope
def __init__(self):
pass
#internally bind a function as a method of self's class -- note that this one has issues!
def addmethod(self, method, name):
self.__dict__[name] = types.MethodType( method, self.__class__ )
# predfined function to compare with
def f0(self, x):
print 'f0\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r)
a = C() # created before modified instnace
b = C() # modified instnace
def f1(self, x): # bind internally
print 'f1\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
def f2( self, x): # add to class instance's .__dict__ as method type
print 'f2\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
def f3( self, x): # assign to class as method type
print 'f3\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
def f4( self, x): # add to class instance's .__dict__ using a general function
print 'f4\tx = %d\tr = %d' % ( x, self.r )
b.addmethod(f1, 'f1')
b.__dict__['f2'] = types.MethodType( f2, b)
b.f3 = types.MethodType( f3, b)
ADDMETHOD(b, f4, 'f4')
b.f0(0) # OUT: f0 x = 0 r = 10
b.f1(1) # OUT: f1 x = 1 r = 10
b.f2(2) # OUT: f2 x = 2 r = 10
b.f3(3) # OUT: f3 x = 3 r = 10
b.f4(4) # OUT: f4 x = 4 r = 10
k = 2
print 'changing b.r from {0} to {1}'.format(b.r, k)
b.r = k
print 'new b.r = {0}'.format(b.r)
b.f0(0) # OUT: f0 x = 0 r = 2
b.f1(1) # OUT: f1 x = 1 r = 10 !!!!!!!!!
b.f2(2) # OUT: f2 x = 2 r = 2
b.f3(3) # OUT: f3 x = 3 r = 2
b.f4(4) # OUT: f4 x = 4 r = 2
c = C() # created after modifying instance
# let's have a look at each instance's method type attributes
print '\nattributes of a:'
listattr(a)
# OUT:
# attributes of a:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FD88>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FD88>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FD88>>
print '\nattributes of b:'
listattr(b)
# OUT:
# attributes of b:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f1 <bound method ?.f1 of <class __main__.C at 0x000000000237AB28>>
# f2 <bound method ?.f2 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f3 <bound method ?.f3 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
# f4 <bound method ?.f4 of <__main__.C instance at 0x000000000230FE08>>
print '\nattributes of c:'
listattr(c)
# OUT:
# attributes of c:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002313108>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002313108>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002313108>>
Personally, I prefer the external ADDMETHOD function route, as it allows me to dynamically assign new method names within an iterator as well.
def y(self, x):
pass
d = C()
for i in range(1,5):
ADDMETHOD(d, y, 'f%d' % i)
print '\nattributes of d:'
listattr(d)
# OUT:
# attributes of d:
# __init__ <bound method C.__init__ of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# addmethod <bound method C.addmethod of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f0 <bound method C.f0 of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f1 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f2 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f3 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
# f4 <bound method ?.y of <__main__.C instance at 0x0000000002303508>>
回答 10
这实际上是“杰森·普拉特”答案的附加内容
尽管杰森斯(Jasons)回答有效,但只有在要向类中添加函数时才起作用。当我尝试从.py源代码文件中重新加载现有方法时,它对我不起作用。
我花了很长时间才找到解决方法,但是这个技巧似乎很简单… 1.st从源代码文件导入代码2.nd强制重新加载3.rd使用types.FunctionType(…)来转换导入并绑定到函数的方法,您还可以传递当前的全局变量,因为重新加载的方法将位于不同的命名空间4.现在,您可以按照类型的“ Jason Pratt”的建议继续使用type.MethodType(… )
例:
# this class resides inside ReloadCodeDemo.py
class A:
def bar( self ):
print "bar1"
def reloadCode(self, methodName):
''' use this function to reload any function of class A'''
import types
import ReloadCodeDemo as ReloadMod # import the code as module
reload (ReloadMod) # force a reload of the module
myM = getattr(ReloadMod.A,methodName) #get reloaded Method
myTempFunc = types.FunctionType(# convert the method to a simple function
myM.im_func.func_code, #the methods code
globals(), # globals to use
argdefs=myM.im_func.func_defaults # default values for variables if any
)
myNewM = types.MethodType(myTempFunc,self,self.__class__) #convert the function to a method
setattr(self,methodName,myNewM) # add the method to the function
if __name__ == '__main__':
a = A()
a.bar()
# now change your code and save the file
a.reloadCode('bar') # reloads the file
a.bar() # now executes the reloaded code
This is actually an addon to the answer of “Jason Pratt”
Although Jasons answer works, it does only work if one wants to add a function to a class.
It did not work for me when I tried to reload an already existing method from the .py source code file.
It took me for ages to find a workaround, but the trick seems simple…
1.st import the code from the source code file
2.nd force a reload
3.rd use types.FunctionType(…) to convert the imported and bound method to a function
you can also pass on the current global variables, as the reloaded method would be in a different namespace
4.th now you can continue as suggested by “Jason Pratt”
using the types.MethodType(…)
Example:
# this class resides inside ReloadCodeDemo.py
class A:
def bar( self ):
print "bar1"
def reloadCode(self, methodName):
''' use this function to reload any function of class A'''
import types
import ReloadCodeDemo as ReloadMod # import the code as module
reload (ReloadMod) # force a reload of the module
myM = getattr(ReloadMod.A,methodName) #get reloaded Method
myTempFunc = types.FunctionType(# convert the method to a simple function
myM.im_func.func_code, #the methods code
globals(), # globals to use
argdefs=myM.im_func.func_defaults # default values for variables if any
)
myNewM = types.MethodType(myTempFunc,self,self.__class__) #convert the function to a method
setattr(self,methodName,myNewM) # add the method to the function
if __name__ == '__main__':
a = A()
a.bar()
# now change your code and save the file
a.reloadCode('bar') # reloads the file
a.bar() # now executes the reloaded code
回答 11
如果有什么帮助,我最近发布了一个名为Gorilla的Python库,以使Monkey修补过程更加方便。
使用函数needle()
来修补名为的模块的过程guineapig
如下:
import gorilla
import guineapig
@gorilla.patch(guineapig)
def needle():
print("awesome")
但它也需要照顾的更有趣的使用情况如图所示FAQ从文档。
该代码可在GitHub上获得。
If it can be of any help, I recently released a Python library named Gorilla to make the process of monkey patching more convenient.
Using a function needle()
to patch a module named guineapig
goes as follows:
import gorilla
import guineapig
@gorilla.patch(guineapig)
def needle():
print("awesome")
But it also takes care of more interesting use cases as shown in the FAQ from the documentation.
The code is available on GitHub.
回答 12
这个问题是几年前提出的,但是,有一种简单的方法可以使用装饰器来模拟函数与类实例的绑定:
def binder (function, instance):
copy_of_function = type (function) (function.func_code, {})
copy_of_function.__bind_to__ = instance
def bound_function (*args, **kwargs):
return copy_of_function (copy_of_function.__bind_to__, *args, **kwargs)
return bound_function
class SupaClass (object):
def __init__ (self):
self.supaAttribute = 42
def new_method (self):
print self.supaAttribute
supaInstance = SupaClass ()
supaInstance.supMethod = binder (new_method, supaInstance)
otherInstance = SupaClass ()
otherInstance.supaAttribute = 72
otherInstance.supMethod = binder (new_method, otherInstance)
otherInstance.supMethod ()
supaInstance.supMethod ()
在那里,当您将函数和实例传递给活页夹装饰器时,它将创建一个新函数,其代码对象与第一个相同。然后,该类的给定实例存储在新创建的函数的属性中。装饰器返回一个(第三个)函数,该函数自动调用复制的函数,并将实例作为第一个参数。
总之,您将获得一个模拟它绑定到类实例的函数。保留原始功能不变。
This question was opened years ago, but hey, there’s an easy way to simulate the binding of a function to a class instance using decorators:
def binder (function, instance):
copy_of_function = type (function) (function.func_code, {})
copy_of_function.__bind_to__ = instance
def bound_function (*args, **kwargs):
return copy_of_function (copy_of_function.__bind_to__, *args, **kwargs)
return bound_function
class SupaClass (object):
def __init__ (self):
self.supaAttribute = 42
def new_method (self):
print self.supaAttribute
supaInstance = SupaClass ()
supaInstance.supMethod = binder (new_method, supaInstance)
otherInstance = SupaClass ()
otherInstance.supaAttribute = 72
otherInstance.supMethod = binder (new_method, otherInstance)
otherInstance.supMethod ()
supaInstance.supMethod ()
There, when you pass the function and the instance to the binder decorator, it will create a new function, with the same code object as the first one. Then, the given instance of the class is stored in an attribute of the newly created function. The decorator return a (third) function calling automatically the copied function, giving the instance as the first parameter.
In conclusion you get a function simulating it’s binding to the class instance. Letting the original function unchanged.
回答 13
Jason Pratt发表的内容是正确的。
>>> class Test(object):
... def a(self):
... pass
...
>>> def b(self):
... pass
...
>>> Test.b = b
>>> type(b)
<type 'function'>
>>> type(Test.a)
<type 'instancemethod'>
>>> type(Test.b)
<type 'instancemethod'>
如您所见,Python认为b()与a()没有什么不同。在Python中,所有方法只是碰巧是函数的变量。
What Jason Pratt posted is correct.
>>> class Test(object):
... def a(self):
... pass
...
>>> def b(self):
... pass
...
>>> Test.b = b
>>> type(b)
<type 'function'>
>>> type(Test.a)
<type 'instancemethod'>
>>> type(Test.b)
<type 'instancemethod'>
As you can see, Python doesn’t consider b() any different than a(). In Python all methods are just variables that happen to be functions.
回答 14
我感到奇怪的是,没有人提到上面列出的所有方法都会在添加的方法和实例之间创建一个循环引用,从而导致对象在垃圾回收之前一直保持不变。有一个古老的技巧通过扩展对象的类来添加描述符:
def addmethod(obj, name, func):
klass = obj.__class__
subclass = type(klass.__name__, (klass,), {})
setattr(subclass, name, func)
obj.__class__ = subclass
I find it strange that nobody mentioned that all of the methods listed above creates a cycle reference between the added method and the instance, causing the object to be persistent till garbage collection. There was an old trick adding a descriptor by extending the class of the object:
def addmethod(obj, name, func):
klass = obj.__class__
subclass = type(klass.__name__, (klass,), {})
setattr(subclass, name, func)
obj.__class__ = subclass
回答 15
from types import MethodType
def method(self):
print 'hi!'
setattr( targetObj, method.__name__, MethodType(method, targetObj, type(method)) )
有了这个,你可以使用self指针
from types import MethodType
def method(self):
print 'hi!'
setattr( targetObj, method.__name__, MethodType(method, targetObj, type(method)) )
With this, you can use the self pointer