知识问答

在Python 3中是否可以看到generator.next（）？

内容 隐藏
问题：在Python 3中是否可以看到generator.next（）？
回答 0
回答 1
回答 2

问题：在Python 3中是否可以看到generator.next（）？

我有一个生成序列的生成器，例如：

def triangle_nums():
    '''Generates a series of triangle numbers'''
    tn = 0
    counter = 1
    while True:
        tn += counter
        yield tn
        counter += + 1

在Python 2中，我可以进行以下调用：

g = triangle_nums()  # get the generator
g.next()             # get the next value

但是在Python 3中，如果我执行相同的两行代码，则会出现以下错误：

AttributeError: 'generator' object has no attribute 'next'

但是，循环迭代器语法确实可以在Python 3中使用

for n in triangle_nums():
    if not exit_cond:
       do_something()...

我还没有找到任何可以解释Python 3行为差异的信息。

点击查看英文原文

I have a generator that generates a series, for example:

def triangle_nums():
    '''Generates a series of triangle numbers'''
    tn = 0
    counter = 1
    while True:
        tn += counter
        yield tn
        counter += + 1

In Python 2 I am able to make the following calls:

g = triangle_nums()  # get the generator
g.next()             # get the next value

however in Python 3 if I execute the same two lines of code I get the following error:

AttributeError: 'generator' object has no attribute 'next'

but, the loop iterator syntax does work in Python 3

for n in triangle_nums():
    if not exit_cond:
       do_something()...

I haven’t been able to find anything yet that explains this difference in behavior for Python 3.

回答 0

g.next()已重命名为g.__next__()。这样做的原因是一致性：特殊方法（例如__init__()和）__del__()都带有双下划线（在当前情况下为“ dunder”），并且.next()是该规则的少数exceptions之一。这已在Python 3.0中修复。[*]

但是请不要g.__next__()使用next(g)。

[*]还有其他特殊属性可以解决此问题；func_name，现在__name__，等等。

点击查看英文原文

g.next() has been renamed to g.__next__(). The reason for this is consistency: special methods like __init__() and __del__() all have double underscores (or “dunder” in the current vernacular), and .next() was one of the few exceptions to that rule. This was fixed in Python 3.0. [*]

But instead of calling g.__next__(), use next(g).

[*] There are other special attributes that have gotten this fix; func_name, is now __name__, etc.

回答 1

尝试：

next(g)

查看这个整洁的表，其中显示了2和3之间的语法差异。

点击查看英文原文

Try:

next(g)

Check out this neat table that shows the differences in syntax between 2 and 3 when it comes to this.

回答 2

如果您的代码必须在Python2和Python3下运行，请使用2to3 六个库，如下所示：

import six

six.next(g)  # on PY2K: 'g.next()' and onPY3K: 'next(g)'
点击查看英文原文

If your code must run under Python2 and Python3, use the 2to3 six library like this:

import six

six.next(g)  # on PY2K: 'g.next()' and onPY3K: 'next(g)'