问题:如何从元组列表中提取第n个元素?
我正在尝试从元组列表中获取第n个元素。
我有类似的东西:
elements = [(1,1,1),(2,3,7),(3,5,10)]
我希望仅将每个元组的第二个元素提取到列表中:
seconds = [1, 3, 5]
我知道可以通过for
循环来完成,但是我想知道是否有另一种方法,因为我有成千上万的元组。
I’m trying to obtain the n-th elements from a list of tuples.
I have something like:
elements = [(1,1,1),(2,3,7),(3,5,10)]
I wish to extract only the second elements of each tuple into a list:
seconds = [1, 3, 5]
I know that it could be done with a for
loop but I wanted to know if there’s another way since I have thousands of tuples.
回答 0
n = 1 # N. . .
[x[n] for x in elements]
n = 1 # N. . .
[x[n] for x in elements]
回答 1
这也适用:
zip(*elements)[1]
(我主要是在发布此信息,以向自己证明我已经厌倦了zip
……)
实际观看:
>>> help(zip)
内置模块的内置功能zip的帮助:
压缩(…)
zip(seq1 [,seq2 […]])-> [(seq1 [0],seq2 [0] …),(…)]
返回一个元组列表,其中每个元组包含每个参数序列中的第i个元素。返回的列表的长度被截断为最短参数序列的长度。
>>> elements = [(1,1,1),(2,3,7),(3,5,10)]
>>> zip(*elements)
[(1, 2, 3), (1, 3, 5), (1, 7, 10)]
>>> zip(*elements)[1]
(1, 3, 5)
>>>
我今天学到的整洁的东西:使用*list
自变量为函数创建参数列表…
注意:在Python3中,zip
返回一个迭代器,因此请使用list(zip(*elements))
返回一个元组列表。
This also works:
zip(*elements)[1]
(I am mainly posting this, to prove to myself that I have groked zip
…)
See it in action:
>>> help(zip)
Help on built-in function zip in module builtin:
zip(…)
zip(seq1 [, seq2 […]]) -> [(seq1[0], seq2[0] …), (…)]
Return a list of tuples, where each tuple contains the i-th element from each of the argument sequences. The returned list is truncated in length to the length of the shortest argument sequence.
>>> elements = [(1,1,1),(2,3,7),(3,5,10)]
>>> zip(*elements)
[(1, 2, 3), (1, 3, 5), (1, 7, 10)]
>>> zip(*elements)[1]
(1, 3, 5)
>>>
Neat thing I learned today: Use *list
in arguments to create a parameter list for a function…
Note: In Python3, zip
returns an iterator, so instead use list(zip(*elements))
to return a list of tuples.
回答 2
我知道可以用FOR完成,但是我想知道是否还有其他方法
还有另一种方式。您也可以使用map和itemgetter来做到这一点:
>>> from operator import itemgetter
>>> map(itemgetter(1), elements)
但是,这仍然在内部执行循环,并且比列表理解要慢一些:
setup = 'elements = [(1,1,1) for _ in range(100000)];from operator import itemgetter'
method1 = '[x[1] for x in elements]'
method2 = 'map(itemgetter(1), elements)'
import timeit
t = timeit.Timer(method1, setup)
print('Method 1: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method2, setup)
print('Method 2: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
结果:
方法1:1.25699996948
方法2:1.46600008011
如果您需要遍历列表,则可以使用a for
。
I know that it could be done with a FOR but I wanted to know if there’s another way
There is another way. You can also do it with map and itemgetter:
>>> from operator import itemgetter
>>> map(itemgetter(1), elements)
This still performs a loop internally though and it is slightly slower than the list comprehension:
setup = 'elements = [(1,1,1) for _ in range(100000)];from operator import itemgetter'
method1 = '[x[1] for x in elements]'
method2 = 'map(itemgetter(1), elements)'
import timeit
t = timeit.Timer(method1, setup)
print('Method 1: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method2, setup)
print('Method 2: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
Results:
Method 1: 1.25699996948
Method 2: 1.46600008011
If you need to iterate over a list then using a for
is fine.
回答 3
我在寻找哪种方式最快地拉出2元组列表的第二个元素时发现了这一点。不是我想要的,但是运行了与第3种方法所示相同的测试,并测试了zip方法
setup = 'elements = [(1,1) for _ in range(100000)];from operator import itemgetter'
method1 = '[x[1] for x in elements]'
method2 = 'map(itemgetter(1), elements)'
method3 = 'dict(elements).values()'
method4 = 'zip(*elements)[1]'
import timeit
t = timeit.Timer(method1, setup)
print('Method 1: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method2, setup)
print('Method 2: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method3, setup)
print('Method 3: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method4, setup)
print('Method 4: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
Method 1: 0.618785858154
Method 2: 0.711684942245
Method 3: 0.298138141632
Method 4: 1.32586884499
因此,如果您有2个元组对,只需将其转换为dict并取值就可以快两倍。
Found this as I was searching for which way is fastest to pull the second element of a 2-tuple list. Not what I wanted but ran same test as shown with a 3rd method plus test the zip method
setup = 'elements = [(1,1) for _ in range(100000)];from operator import itemgetter'
method1 = '[x[1] for x in elements]'
method2 = 'map(itemgetter(1), elements)'
method3 = 'dict(elements).values()'
method4 = 'zip(*elements)[1]'
import timeit
t = timeit.Timer(method1, setup)
print('Method 1: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method2, setup)
print('Method 2: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method3, setup)
print('Method 3: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
t = timeit.Timer(method4, setup)
print('Method 4: ' + str(t.timeit(100)))
Method 1: 0.618785858154
Method 2: 0.711684942245
Method 3: 0.298138141632
Method 4: 1.32586884499
So over twice as fast if you have a 2 tuple pair to just convert to a dict and take the values.
回答 4
Python 3.6的计时,用于从2元组列表中提取第二个元素。
另外,添加了numpy
数组方法,该方法更易于阅读(但可以说比列表理解更简单)。
from operator import itemgetter
elements = [(1,1) for _ in range(100000)]
%timeit second = [x[1] for x in elements]
%timeit second = list(map(itemgetter(1), elements))
%timeit second = dict(elements).values()
%timeit second = list(zip(*elements))[1]
%timeit second = np.array(elements)[:,1]
和时间:
list comprehension: 4.73 ms ± 206 µs per loop
list(map): 5.3 ms ± 167 µs per loop
dict: 2.25 ms ± 103 µs per loop
list(zip) 5.2 ms ± 252 µs per loop
numpy array: 28.7 ms ± 1.88 ms per loop
请注意,map()
并且zip()
不再返回列表,因此进行了显式转换。
Timings for Python 3.6 for extracting the second element from a 2-tuple list.
Also, added numpy
array method, which is simpler to read (but arguably simpler than the list comprehension).
from operator import itemgetter
elements = [(1,1) for _ in range(100000)]
%timeit second = [x[1] for x in elements]
%timeit second = list(map(itemgetter(1), elements))
%timeit second = dict(elements).values()
%timeit second = list(zip(*elements))[1]
%timeit second = np.array(elements)[:,1]
and the timings:
list comprehension: 4.73 ms ± 206 µs per loop
list(map): 5.3 ms ± 167 µs per loop
dict: 2.25 ms ± 103 µs per loop
list(zip) 5.2 ms ± 252 µs per loop
numpy array: 28.7 ms ± 1.88 ms per loop
Note that map()
and zip()
do not return a list anymore, hence the explicit conversion.
回答 5
map (lambda x:(x[1]),elements)
map (lambda x:(x[1]),elements)
回答 6
使用islice
和chain.from_iterable
:
>>> from itertools import chain, islice
>>> elements = [(1,1,1),(2,3,7),(3,5,10)]
>>> list(chain.from_iterable(islice(item, 1, 2) for item in elements))
[1, 3, 5]
当您需要多个元素时,这可能会很有用:
>>> elements = [(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5),
(10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15),
(20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25)]
>>> list(chain.from_iterable(islice(tuple_, 2, 5) for tuple_ in elements))
[2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24]
Using islice
and chain.from_iterable
:
>>> from itertools import chain, islice
>>> elements = [(1,1,1),(2,3,7),(3,5,10)]
>>> list(chain.from_iterable(islice(item, 1, 2) for item in elements))
[1, 3, 5]
This can be useful when you need more than one element:
>>> elements = [(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5),
(10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15),
(20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25)]
>>> list(chain.from_iterable(islice(tuple_, 2, 5) for tuple_ in elements))
[2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24]
声明:本站所有文章,如无特殊说明或标注,均为本站原创发布。任何个人或组织,在未征得本站同意时,禁止复制、盗用、采集、发布本站内容到任何网站、书籍等各类媒体平台。如若本站内容侵犯了原著者的合法权益,可联系我们进行处理。