问题:将模块“子进程”与超时一起使用
这是运行任意命令以返回其stdout
数据或在非零退出代码上引发异常的Python代码:
proc = subprocess.Popen(
cmd,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, # Merge stdout and stderr
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
shell=True)
communicate
用于等待进程退出:
stdoutdata, stderrdata = proc.communicate()
该subprocess
模块不支持超时-可以杀死运行时间超过X秒的进程-因此,communicate
可能需要永远运行。
在打算在Windows和Linux上运行的Python程序中实现超时的最简单方法是什么?
Here’s the Python code to run an arbitrary command returning its stdout
data, or raise an exception on non-zero exit codes:
proc = subprocess.Popen(
cmd,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, # Merge stdout and stderr
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
shell=True)
communicate
is used to wait for the process to exit:
stdoutdata, stderrdata = proc.communicate()
The subprocess
module does not support timeout–ability to kill a process running for more than X number of seconds–therefore, communicate
may take forever to run.
What is the simplest way to implement timeouts in a Python program meant to run on Windows and Linux?
回答 0
在Python 3.3+中:
from subprocess import STDOUT, check_output
output = check_output(cmd, stderr=STDOUT, timeout=seconds)
output
是一个字节字符串,其中包含命令的合并标准输出,标准错误数据。
check_output
提出CalledProcessError
问题文本中指定的非零退出状态,这与proc.communicate()
的方法。
我已删除,shell=True
因为它经常不必要地使用。如果cmd
确实需要,您可以随时将其添加回去。如果添加,shell=True
即子进程是否产生了自己的后代;check_output()
可以比超时指示晚得多返回,请参阅子进程超时失败。
超时功能可在Python 2.x上通过subprocess32
3.2+子进程模块的反向端口使用。
In Python 3.3+:
from subprocess import STDOUT, check_output
output = check_output(cmd, stderr=STDOUT, timeout=seconds)
output
is a byte string that contains command’s merged stdout, stderr data.
check_output
raises CalledProcessError
on non-zero exit status as specified in the question’s text unlike proc.communicate()
method.
I’ve removed shell=True
because it is often used unnecessarily. You can always add it back if cmd
indeed requires it. If you add shell=True
i.e., if the child process spawns its own descendants; check_output()
can return much later than the timeout indicates, see Subprocess timeout failure.
The timeout feature is available on Python 2.x via the subprocess32
backport of the 3.2+ subprocess module.
回答 1
我对底层细节了解不多;但是,鉴于python 2.6中的API提供了等待线程并终止进程的能力,那么如何在单独的线程中运行进程呢?
import subprocess, threading
class Command(object):
def __init__(self, cmd):
self.cmd = cmd
self.process = None
def run(self, timeout):
def target():
print 'Thread started'
self.process = subprocess.Popen(self.cmd, shell=True)
self.process.communicate()
print 'Thread finished'
thread = threading.Thread(target=target)
thread.start()
thread.join(timeout)
if thread.is_alive():
print 'Terminating process'
self.process.terminate()
thread.join()
print self.process.returncode
command = Command("echo 'Process started'; sleep 2; echo 'Process finished'")
command.run(timeout=3)
command.run(timeout=1)
我的计算机中此代码段的输出为:
Thread started
Process started
Process finished
Thread finished
0
Thread started
Process started
Terminating process
Thread finished
-15
从中可以看出,在第一次执行中,进程正确完成了(返回代码0),而在第二次执行中,进程终止了(返回代码-15)。
我没有在Windows中进行测试;但是,除了更新示例命令外,我认为它应该可以工作,因为我在文档中没有发现任何不支持thread.join或process.terminate的内容。
I don’t know much about the low level details; but, given that in
python 2.6 the API offers the ability to wait for threads and
terminate processes, what about running the process in a separate
thread?
import subprocess, threading
class Command(object):
def __init__(self, cmd):
self.cmd = cmd
self.process = None
def run(self, timeout):
def target():
print 'Thread started'
self.process = subprocess.Popen(self.cmd, shell=True)
self.process.communicate()
print 'Thread finished'
thread = threading.Thread(target=target)
thread.start()
thread.join(timeout)
if thread.is_alive():
print 'Terminating process'
self.process.terminate()
thread.join()
print self.process.returncode
command = Command("echo 'Process started'; sleep 2; echo 'Process finished'")
command.run(timeout=3)
command.run(timeout=1)
The output of this snippet in my machine is:
Thread started
Process started
Process finished
Thread finished
0
Thread started
Process started
Terminating process
Thread finished
-15
where it can be seen that, in the first execution, the process
finished correctly (return code 0), while the in the second one the
process was terminated (return code -15).
I haven’t tested in windows; but, aside from updating the example
command, I think it should work since I haven’t found in the
documentation anything that says that thread.join or process.terminate
is not supported.
回答 2
可以使用threading.Timer类简化jcollado的答案:
import shlex
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
from threading import Timer
def run(cmd, timeout_sec):
proc = Popen(shlex.split(cmd), stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
timer = Timer(timeout_sec, proc.kill)
try:
timer.start()
stdout, stderr = proc.communicate()
finally:
timer.cancel()
# Examples: both take 1 second
run("sleep 1", 5) # process ends normally at 1 second
run("sleep 5", 1) # timeout happens at 1 second
jcollado’s answer can be simplified using the threading.Timer class:
import shlex
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
from threading import Timer
def run(cmd, timeout_sec):
proc = Popen(shlex.split(cmd), stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
timer = Timer(timeout_sec, proc.kill)
try:
timer.start()
stdout, stderr = proc.communicate()
finally:
timer.cancel()
# Examples: both take 1 second
run("sleep 1", 5) # process ends normally at 1 second
run("sleep 5", 1) # timeout happens at 1 second
回答 3
如果您使用的是Unix,
import signal
...
class Alarm(Exception):
pass
def alarm_handler(signum, frame):
raise Alarm
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, alarm_handler)
signal.alarm(5*60) # 5 minutes
try:
stdoutdata, stderrdata = proc.communicate()
signal.alarm(0) # reset the alarm
except Alarm:
print "Oops, taking too long!"
# whatever else
If you’re on Unix,
import signal
...
class Alarm(Exception):
pass
def alarm_handler(signum, frame):
raise Alarm
signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, alarm_handler)
signal.alarm(5*60) # 5 minutes
try:
stdoutdata, stderrdata = proc.communicate()
signal.alarm(0) # reset the alarm
except Alarm:
print "Oops, taking too long!"
# whatever else
回答 4
这是Alex Martelli作为具有适当过程终止功能的模块的解决方案。其他方法不起作用,因为它们不使用proc.communicate()。因此,如果您有一个产生大量输出的进程,它将填充其输出缓冲区,然后阻塞直到您从中读取内容。
from os import kill
from signal import alarm, signal, SIGALRM, SIGKILL
from subprocess import PIPE, Popen
def run(args, cwd = None, shell = False, kill_tree = True, timeout = -1, env = None):
'''
Run a command with a timeout after which it will be forcibly
killed.
'''
class Alarm(Exception):
pass
def alarm_handler(signum, frame):
raise Alarm
p = Popen(args, shell = shell, cwd = cwd, stdout = PIPE, stderr = PIPE, env = env)
if timeout != -1:
signal(SIGALRM, alarm_handler)
alarm(timeout)
try:
stdout, stderr = p.communicate()
if timeout != -1:
alarm(0)
except Alarm:
pids = [p.pid]
if kill_tree:
pids.extend(get_process_children(p.pid))
for pid in pids:
# process might have died before getting to this line
# so wrap to avoid OSError: no such process
try:
kill(pid, SIGKILL)
except OSError:
pass
return -9, '', ''
return p.returncode, stdout, stderr
def get_process_children(pid):
p = Popen('ps --no-headers -o pid --ppid %d' % pid, shell = True,
stdout = PIPE, stderr = PIPE)
stdout, stderr = p.communicate()
return [int(p) for p in stdout.split()]
if __name__ == '__main__':
print run('find /', shell = True, timeout = 3)
print run('find', shell = True)
Here is Alex Martelli’s solution as a module with proper process killing. The other approaches do not work because they do not use proc.communicate(). So if you have a process that produces lots of output, it will fill its output buffer and then block until you read something from it.
from os import kill
from signal import alarm, signal, SIGALRM, SIGKILL
from subprocess import PIPE, Popen
def run(args, cwd = None, shell = False, kill_tree = True, timeout = -1, env = None):
'''
Run a command with a timeout after which it will be forcibly
killed.
'''
class Alarm(Exception):
pass
def alarm_handler(signum, frame):
raise Alarm
p = Popen(args, shell = shell, cwd = cwd, stdout = PIPE, stderr = PIPE, env = env)
if timeout != -1:
signal(SIGALRM, alarm_handler)
alarm(timeout)
try:
stdout, stderr = p.communicate()
if timeout != -1:
alarm(0)
except Alarm:
pids = [p.pid]
if kill_tree:
pids.extend(get_process_children(p.pid))
for pid in pids:
# process might have died before getting to this line
# so wrap to avoid OSError: no such process
try:
kill(pid, SIGKILL)
except OSError:
pass
return -9, '', ''
return p.returncode, stdout, stderr
def get_process_children(pid):
p = Popen('ps --no-headers -o pid --ppid %d' % pid, shell = True,
stdout = PIPE, stderr = PIPE)
stdout, stderr = p.communicate()
return [int(p) for p in stdout.split()]
if __name__ == '__main__':
print run('find /', shell = True, timeout = 3)
print run('find', shell = True)
回答 5
我修改了sussudio答案。现在函数返回:( ,returncode
,stdout
,stderr
)timeout
– stdout
和stderr
被解码为UTF-8字符串
def kill_proc(proc, timeout):
timeout["value"] = True
proc.kill()
def run(cmd, timeout_sec):
proc = subprocess.Popen(shlex.split(cmd), stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
timeout = {"value": False}
timer = Timer(timeout_sec, kill_proc, [proc, timeout])
timer.start()
stdout, stderr = proc.communicate()
timer.cancel()
return proc.returncode, stdout.decode("utf-8"), stderr.decode("utf-8"), timeout["value"]
I’ve modified sussudio answer. Now function returns: (returncode
, stdout
, stderr
, timeout
) – stdout
and stderr
is decoded to utf-8 string
def kill_proc(proc, timeout):
timeout["value"] = True
proc.kill()
def run(cmd, timeout_sec):
proc = subprocess.Popen(shlex.split(cmd), stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
timeout = {"value": False}
timer = Timer(timeout_sec, kill_proc, [proc, timeout])
timer.start()
stdout, stderr = proc.communicate()
timer.cancel()
return proc.returncode, stdout.decode("utf-8"), stderr.decode("utf-8"), timeout["value"]
回答 6
惊讶没人提到使用 timeout
timeout 5 ping -c 3 somehost
显然,这不适用于每个用例,但是如果您处理的是简单脚本,那么这是很难克服的。
homebrew
对于Mac用户,也可以通过coreutils中的gtimeout 使用。
surprised nobody mentioned using timeout
timeout 5 ping -c 3 somehost
This won’t for work for every use case obviously, but if your dealing with a simple script, this is hard to beat.
Also available as gtimeout in coreutils via homebrew
for mac users.
回答 7
timeout
现在由subprocess模块支持call()
并communicate()
在其中(在Python3.3中):
import subprocess
subprocess.call("command", timeout=20, shell=True)
这将调用命令并引发异常
subprocess.TimeoutExpired
如果20秒后命令仍未完成。
然后,您可以处理异常以继续执行代码,例如:
try:
subprocess.call("command", timeout=20, shell=True)
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
# insert code here
希望这可以帮助。
timeout
is now supported by call()
and communicate()
in the subprocess module (as of Python3.3):
import subprocess
subprocess.call("command", timeout=20, shell=True)
This will call the command and raise the exception
subprocess.TimeoutExpired
if the command doesn’t finish after 20 seconds.
You can then handle the exception to continue your code, something like:
try:
subprocess.call("command", timeout=20, shell=True)
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
# insert code here
Hope this helps.
回答 8
另一种选择是写入临时文件以防止stdout阻塞,而不是需要使用communication()进行轮询。这对我有用,而其他答案却没有。例如在Windows上。
outFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
errFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
proc = subprocess.Popen(args, stderr=errFile, stdout=outFile, universal_newlines=False)
wait_remaining_sec = timeout
while proc.poll() is None and wait_remaining_sec > 0:
time.sleep(1)
wait_remaining_sec -= 1
if wait_remaining_sec <= 0:
killProc(proc.pid)
raise ProcessIncompleteError(proc, timeout)
# read temp streams from start
outFile.seek(0);
errFile.seek(0);
out = outFile.read()
err = errFile.read()
outFile.close()
errFile.close()
Another option is to write to a temporary file to prevent the stdout blocking instead of needing to poll with communicate(). This worked for me where the other answers did not; for example on windows.
outFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
errFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
proc = subprocess.Popen(args, stderr=errFile, stdout=outFile, universal_newlines=False)
wait_remaining_sec = timeout
while proc.poll() is None and wait_remaining_sec > 0:
time.sleep(1)
wait_remaining_sec -= 1
if wait_remaining_sec <= 0:
killProc(proc.pid)
raise ProcessIncompleteError(proc, timeout)
# read temp streams from start
outFile.seek(0);
errFile.seek(0);
out = outFile.read()
err = errFile.read()
outFile.close()
errFile.close()
回答 9
我不知道为什么它不mentionned但是因为Python 3.5,有一个新的subprocess.run
通用指令(即意味着取代check_call
,check_output
……),并且其具有timeout
参数也是如此。
subprocess.run(args,*,stdin = None,input = None,stdout = None,stderr = None,shell = False,cwd = None,timeout = None,check = False,encoding = None,errors = None)
Run the command described by args. Wait for command to complete, then return a CompletedProcess instance.
subprocess.TimeoutExpired
超时到期时会引发异常。
I don’t know why it isn’t mentionned but since Python 3.5, there’s a new subprocess.run
universal command (that is meant to replace check_call
, check_output
…) and which has the timeout
parameter as well.
subprocess.run(args, *, stdin=None, input=None, stdout=None, stderr=None, shell=False, cwd=None, timeout=None, check=False, encoding=None, errors=None)
Run the command described by args. Wait for command to complete, then return a CompletedProcess instance.
It raises a subprocess.TimeoutExpired
exception when the timeout is expired.
回答 10
这是我的解决方案,我正在使用线程和事件:
import subprocess
from threading import Thread, Event
def kill_on_timeout(done, timeout, proc):
if not done.wait(timeout):
proc.kill()
def exec_command(command, timeout):
done = Event()
proc = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
watcher = Thread(target=kill_on_timeout, args=(done, timeout, proc))
watcher.daemon = True
watcher.start()
data, stderr = proc.communicate()
done.set()
return data, stderr, proc.returncode
实际上:
In [2]: exec_command(['sleep', '10'], 5)
Out[2]: ('', '', -9)
In [3]: exec_command(['sleep', '10'], 11)
Out[3]: ('', '', 0)
Here is my solution, I was using Thread and Event:
import subprocess
from threading import Thread, Event
def kill_on_timeout(done, timeout, proc):
if not done.wait(timeout):
proc.kill()
def exec_command(command, timeout):
done = Event()
proc = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
watcher = Thread(target=kill_on_timeout, args=(done, timeout, proc))
watcher.daemon = True
watcher.start()
data, stderr = proc.communicate()
done.set()
return data, stderr, proc.returncode
In action:
In [2]: exec_command(['sleep', '10'], 5)
Out[2]: ('', '', -9)
In [3]: exec_command(['sleep', '10'], 11)
Out[3]: ('', '', 0)
回答 11
回答 12
我将带有线程自的解决方案添加jcollado
到了我的Python模块easyprocess中。
安装:
pip install easyprocess
例:
from easyprocess import Proc
# shell is not supported!
stdout=Proc('ping localhost').call(timeout=1.5).stdout
print stdout
I added the solution with threading from jcollado
to my Python module easyprocess.
Install:
pip install easyprocess
Example:
from easyprocess import Proc
# shell is not supported!
stdout=Proc('ping localhost').call(timeout=1.5).stdout
print stdout
回答 13
如果您使用的是python 2,请尝试一下
import subprocess32
try:
output = subprocess32.check_output(command, shell=True, timeout=3)
except subprocess32.TimeoutExpired as e:
print e
if you are using python 2, give it a try
import subprocess32
try:
output = subprocess32.check_output(command, shell=True, timeout=3)
except subprocess32.TimeoutExpired as e:
print e
回答 14
前置Linux命令timeout
不是一个坏的解决方法,它对我有用。
cmd = "timeout 20 "+ cmd
subprocess.Popen(cmd.split(), stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
(output, err) = p.communicate()
Prepending the Linux command timeout
isn’t a bad workaround and it worked for me.
cmd = "timeout 20 "+ cmd
subprocess.Popen(cmd.split(), stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
(output, err) = p.communicate()
回答 15
我已经实现了我可以从其中一些中学到的东西。这在Windows中有效,并且由于这是社区Wiki,因此我想我也将共享我的代码:
class Command(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, cmd, outFile, errFile, timeout):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.cmd = cmd
self.process = None
self.outFile = outFile
self.errFile = errFile
self.timed_out = False
self.timeout = timeout
def run(self):
self.process = subprocess.Popen(self.cmd, stdout = self.outFile, \
stderr = self.errFile)
while (self.process.poll() is None and self.timeout > 0):
time.sleep(1)
self.timeout -= 1
if not self.timeout > 0:
self.process.terminate()
self.timed_out = True
else:
self.timed_out = False
然后从另一个类或文件:
outFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
errFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
executor = command.Command(c, outFile, errFile, timeout)
executor.daemon = True
executor.start()
executor.join()
if executor.timed_out:
out = 'timed out'
else:
outFile.seek(0)
errFile.seek(0)
out = outFile.read()
err = errFile.read()
outFile.close()
errFile.close()
I’ve implemented what I could gather from a few of these. This works in Windows, and since this is a community wiki, I figure I would share my code as well:
class Command(threading.Thread):
def __init__(self, cmd, outFile, errFile, timeout):
threading.Thread.__init__(self)
self.cmd = cmd
self.process = None
self.outFile = outFile
self.errFile = errFile
self.timed_out = False
self.timeout = timeout
def run(self):
self.process = subprocess.Popen(self.cmd, stdout = self.outFile, \
stderr = self.errFile)
while (self.process.poll() is None and self.timeout > 0):
time.sleep(1)
self.timeout -= 1
if not self.timeout > 0:
self.process.terminate()
self.timed_out = True
else:
self.timed_out = False
Then from another class or file:
outFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
errFile = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()
executor = command.Command(c, outFile, errFile, timeout)
executor.daemon = True
executor.start()
executor.join()
if executor.timed_out:
out = 'timed out'
else:
outFile.seek(0)
errFile.seek(0)
out = outFile.read()
err = errFile.read()
outFile.close()
errFile.close()
回答 16
一旦您了解了* unix中运行全过程的机器,您将轻松找到更简单的解决方案:
考虑这个简单的示例,如何使用select.select()使超时的communication()方法(现在几乎在* nix上几乎所有可用)。这也可以用epoll / poll / kqueue编写,但是select.select()变体可能是一个很好的例子。而且select.select()的主要限制(速度和最大1024 fds)不适用于您的任务。
这可以在* nix下工作,不创建线程,不使用信号,可以从任何线程(不仅是主线程)启动,并且速度足够快,可以从我的计算机上的stdout(i5 2.3ghz)读取250mb / s的数据。
在通信结束时加入stdout / stderr存在问题。如果您的程序输出很大,可能会导致占用大量内存。但是您可以在较小的超时时间内多次调用communication()。
class Popen(subprocess.Popen):
def communicate(self, input=None, timeout=None):
if timeout is None:
return subprocess.Popen.communicate(self, input)
if self.stdin:
# Flush stdio buffer, this might block if user
# has been writing to .stdin in an uncontrolled
# fashion.
self.stdin.flush()
if not input:
self.stdin.close()
read_set, write_set = [], []
stdout = stderr = None
if self.stdin and input:
write_set.append(self.stdin)
if self.stdout:
read_set.append(self.stdout)
stdout = []
if self.stderr:
read_set.append(self.stderr)
stderr = []
input_offset = 0
deadline = time.time() + timeout
while read_set or write_set:
try:
rlist, wlist, xlist = select.select(read_set, write_set, [], max(0, deadline - time.time()))
except select.error as ex:
if ex.args[0] == errno.EINTR:
continue
raise
if not (rlist or wlist):
# Just break if timeout
# Since we do not close stdout/stderr/stdin, we can call
# communicate() several times reading data by smaller pieces.
break
if self.stdin in wlist:
chunk = input[input_offset:input_offset + subprocess._PIPE_BUF]
try:
bytes_written = os.write(self.stdin.fileno(), chunk)
except OSError as ex:
if ex.errno == errno.EPIPE:
self.stdin.close()
write_set.remove(self.stdin)
else:
raise
else:
input_offset += bytes_written
if input_offset >= len(input):
self.stdin.close()
write_set.remove(self.stdin)
# Read stdout / stderr by 1024 bytes
for fn, tgt in (
(self.stdout, stdout),
(self.stderr, stderr),
):
if fn in rlist:
data = os.read(fn.fileno(), 1024)
if data == '':
fn.close()
read_set.remove(fn)
tgt.append(data)
if stdout is not None:
stdout = ''.join(stdout)
if stderr is not None:
stderr = ''.join(stderr)
return (stdout, stderr)
Once you understand full process running machinery in *unix, you will easily find simplier solution:
Consider this simple example how to make timeoutable communicate() meth using select.select() (available alsmost everythere on *nix nowadays). This also can be written with epoll/poll/kqueue, but select.select() variant could be a good example for you. And major limitations of select.select() (speed and 1024 max fds) are not applicapable for your task.
This works under *nix, does not create threads, does not uses signals, can be lauched from any thread (not only main), and fast enought to read 250mb/s of data from stdout on my machine (i5 2.3ghz).
There is a problem in join’ing stdout/stderr at the end of communicate. If you have huge program output this could lead to big memory usage. But you can call communicate() several times with smaller timeouts.
class Popen(subprocess.Popen):
def communicate(self, input=None, timeout=None):
if timeout is None:
return subprocess.Popen.communicate(self, input)
if self.stdin:
# Flush stdio buffer, this might block if user
# has been writing to .stdin in an uncontrolled
# fashion.
self.stdin.flush()
if not input:
self.stdin.close()
read_set, write_set = [], []
stdout = stderr = None
if self.stdin and input:
write_set.append(self.stdin)
if self.stdout:
read_set.append(self.stdout)
stdout = []
if self.stderr:
read_set.append(self.stderr)
stderr = []
input_offset = 0
deadline = time.time() + timeout
while read_set or write_set:
try:
rlist, wlist, xlist = select.select(read_set, write_set, [], max(0, deadline - time.time()))
except select.error as ex:
if ex.args[0] == errno.EINTR:
continue
raise
if not (rlist or wlist):
# Just break if timeout
# Since we do not close stdout/stderr/stdin, we can call
# communicate() several times reading data by smaller pieces.
break
if self.stdin in wlist:
chunk = input[input_offset:input_offset + subprocess._PIPE_BUF]
try:
bytes_written = os.write(self.stdin.fileno(), chunk)
except OSError as ex:
if ex.errno == errno.EPIPE:
self.stdin.close()
write_set.remove(self.stdin)
else:
raise
else:
input_offset += bytes_written
if input_offset >= len(input):
self.stdin.close()
write_set.remove(self.stdin)
# Read stdout / stderr by 1024 bytes
for fn, tgt in (
(self.stdout, stdout),
(self.stderr, stderr),
):
if fn in rlist:
data = os.read(fn.fileno(), 1024)
if data == '':
fn.close()
read_set.remove(fn)
tgt.append(data)
if stdout is not None:
stdout = ''.join(stdout)
if stderr is not None:
stderr = ''.join(stderr)
return (stdout, stderr)
回答 17
您可以使用 select
import subprocess
from datetime import datetime
from select import select
def call_with_timeout(cmd, timeout):
started = datetime.now()
sp = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
while True:
p = select([sp.stdout], [], [], timeout)
if p[0]:
p[0][0].read()
ret = sp.poll()
if ret is not None:
return ret
if (datetime.now()-started).total_seconds() > timeout:
sp.kill()
return None
You can do this using select
import subprocess
from datetime import datetime
from select import select
def call_with_timeout(cmd, timeout):
started = datetime.now()
sp = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
while True:
p = select([sp.stdout], [], [], timeout)
if p[0]:
p[0][0].read()
ret = sp.poll()
if ret is not None:
return ret
if (datetime.now()-started).total_seconds() > timeout:
sp.kill()
return None
回答 18
回答 19
尽管我没有广泛研究它,但我在ActiveState上发现的这种装饰器似乎对这种事情很有用。与一起subprocess.Popen(..., close_fds=True)
,至少我已经准备好使用Python编写shell脚本了。
Although I haven’t looked at it extensively, this decorator I found at ActiveState seems to be quite useful for this sort of thing. Along with subprocess.Popen(..., close_fds=True)
, at least I’m ready for shell-scripting in Python.
回答 20
如果shell = True,此解决方案将杀死进程树,将参数传递给进程(或不传递参数),具有超时并获取回调的stdout,stderr和进程输出(它将psutil用于kill_proc_tree)。这是基于SO中发布的几种解决方案,包括jcollado的解决方案。在jcollado的回答中张贴对Anson和jradice的评论的回应。已在Windows Srvr 2012和Ubuntu 14.04中测试。请注意,对于Ubuntu,您需要将parent.children(…)调用更改为parent.get_children(…)。
def kill_proc_tree(pid, including_parent=True):
parent = psutil.Process(pid)
children = parent.children(recursive=True)
for child in children:
child.kill()
psutil.wait_procs(children, timeout=5)
if including_parent:
parent.kill()
parent.wait(5)
def run_with_timeout(cmd, current_dir, cmd_parms, timeout):
def target():
process = subprocess.Popen(cmd, cwd=current_dir, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
# wait for the process to terminate
if (cmd_parms == ""):
out, err = process.communicate()
else:
out, err = process.communicate(cmd_parms)
errcode = process.returncode
thread = Thread(target=target)
thread.start()
thread.join(timeout)
if thread.is_alive():
me = os.getpid()
kill_proc_tree(me, including_parent=False)
thread.join()
This solution kills the process tree in case of shell=True, passes parameters to the process (or not), has a timeout and gets the stdout, stderr and process output of the call back (it uses psutil for the kill_proc_tree). This was based on several solutions posted in SO including jcollado’s. Posting in response to comments by Anson and jradice in jcollado’s answer. Tested in Windows Srvr 2012 and Ubuntu 14.04. Please note that for Ubuntu you need to change the parent.children(…) call to parent.get_children(…).
def kill_proc_tree(pid, including_parent=True):
parent = psutil.Process(pid)
children = parent.children(recursive=True)
for child in children:
child.kill()
psutil.wait_procs(children, timeout=5)
if including_parent:
parent.kill()
parent.wait(5)
def run_with_timeout(cmd, current_dir, cmd_parms, timeout):
def target():
process = subprocess.Popen(cmd, cwd=current_dir, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
# wait for the process to terminate
if (cmd_parms == ""):
out, err = process.communicate()
else:
out, err = process.communicate(cmd_parms)
errcode = process.returncode
thread = Thread(target=target)
thread.start()
thread.join(timeout)
if thread.is_alive():
me = os.getpid()
kill_proc_tree(me, including_parent=False)
thread.join()
回答 21
有一个想法可以继承Popen类并使用一些简单的方法装饰器对其进行扩展。我们称之为ExpirablePopen。
from logging import error
from subprocess import Popen
from threading import Event
from threading import Thread
class ExpirablePopen(Popen):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.timeout = kwargs.pop('timeout', 0)
self.timer = None
self.done = Event()
Popen.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
def __tkill(self):
timeout = self.timeout
if not self.done.wait(timeout):
error('Terminating process {} by timeout of {} secs.'.format(self.pid, timeout))
self.kill()
def expirable(func):
def wrapper(self, *args, **kwargs):
# zero timeout means call of parent method
if self.timeout == 0:
return func(self, *args, **kwargs)
# if timer is None, need to start it
if self.timer is None:
self.timer = thr = Thread(target=self.__tkill)
thr.daemon = True
thr.start()
result = func(self, *args, **kwargs)
self.done.set()
return result
return wrapper
wait = expirable(Popen.wait)
communicate = expirable(Popen.communicate)
if __name__ == '__main__':
from subprocess import PIPE
print ExpirablePopen('ssh -T git@bitbucket.org', stdout=PIPE, timeout=1).communicate()
There’s an idea to subclass the Popen class and extend it with some simple method decorators. Let’s call it ExpirablePopen.
from logging import error
from subprocess import Popen
from threading import Event
from threading import Thread
class ExpirablePopen(Popen):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.timeout = kwargs.pop('timeout', 0)
self.timer = None
self.done = Event()
Popen.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
def __tkill(self):
timeout = self.timeout
if not self.done.wait(timeout):
error('Terminating process {} by timeout of {} secs.'.format(self.pid, timeout))
self.kill()
def expirable(func):
def wrapper(self, *args, **kwargs):
# zero timeout means call of parent method
if self.timeout == 0:
return func(self, *args, **kwargs)
# if timer is None, need to start it
if self.timer is None:
self.timer = thr = Thread(target=self.__tkill)
thr.daemon = True
thr.start()
result = func(self, *args, **kwargs)
self.done.set()
return result
return wrapper
wait = expirable(Popen.wait)
communicate = expirable(Popen.communicate)
if __name__ == '__main__':
from subprocess import PIPE
print ExpirablePopen('ssh -T git@bitbucket.org', stdout=PIPE, timeout=1).communicate()
回答 22
我遇到的问题是,如果花费的时间比给定的超时时间长,我想终止多线程子进程。我想在中设置一个超时Popen()
,但是没有用。然后,我意识到这Popen().wait()
等于call()
,因此我有了在该.wait(timeout=xxx)
方法中设置超时的想法,该方法终于奏效了。因此,我通过以下方式解决了问题:
import os
import sys
import signal
import subprocess
from multiprocessing import Pool
cores_for_parallelization = 4
timeout_time = 15 # seconds
def main():
jobs = [...YOUR_JOB_LIST...]
with Pool(cores_for_parallelization) as p:
p.map(run_parallel_jobs, jobs)
def run_parallel_jobs(args):
# Define the arguments including the paths
initial_terminal_command = 'C:\\Python34\\python.exe' # Python executable
function_to_start = 'C:\\temp\\xyz.py' # The multithreading script
final_list = [initial_terminal_command, function_to_start]
final_list.extend(args)
# Start the subprocess and determine the process PID
subp = subprocess.Popen(final_list) # starts the process
pid = subp.pid
# Wait until the return code returns from the function by considering the timeout.
# If not, terminate the process.
try:
returncode = subp.wait(timeout=timeout_time) # should be zero if accomplished
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
# Distinguish between Linux and Windows and terminate the process if
# the timeout has been expired
if sys.platform == 'linux2':
os.kill(pid, signal.SIGTERM)
elif sys.platform == 'win32':
subp.terminate()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
I had the problem that I wanted to terminate a multithreading subprocess if it took longer than a given timeout length. I wanted to set a timeout in Popen()
, but it did not work. Then, I realized that Popen().wait()
is equal to call()
and so I had the idea to set a timeout within the .wait(timeout=xxx)
method, which finally worked. Thus, I solved it this way:
import os
import sys
import signal
import subprocess
from multiprocessing import Pool
cores_for_parallelization = 4
timeout_time = 15 # seconds
def main():
jobs = [...YOUR_JOB_LIST...]
with Pool(cores_for_parallelization) as p:
p.map(run_parallel_jobs, jobs)
def run_parallel_jobs(args):
# Define the arguments including the paths
initial_terminal_command = 'C:\\Python34\\python.exe' # Python executable
function_to_start = 'C:\\temp\\xyz.py' # The multithreading script
final_list = [initial_terminal_command, function_to_start]
final_list.extend(args)
# Start the subprocess and determine the process PID
subp = subprocess.Popen(final_list) # starts the process
pid = subp.pid
# Wait until the return code returns from the function by considering the timeout.
# If not, terminate the process.
try:
returncode = subp.wait(timeout=timeout_time) # should be zero if accomplished
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
# Distinguish between Linux and Windows and terminate the process if
# the timeout has been expired
if sys.platform == 'linux2':
os.kill(pid, signal.SIGTERM)
elif sys.platform == 'win32':
subp.terminate()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
回答 23
不幸的是,我受雇主披露源代码的非常严格的政策约束,因此我无法提供实际的代码。但按我的喜好,最好的解决方案是创建一个重写的子类Popen.wait()
以轮询而不是无限期地等待,并Popen.__init__
接受超时参数。完成后,所有其他Popen
方法(调用wait
)将按预期工作,包括communicate
。
Unfortunately, I’m bound by very strict policies on the disclosure of source code by my employer, so I can’t provide actual code. But for my taste the best solution is to create a subclass overriding Popen.wait()
to poll instead of wait indefinitely, and Popen.__init__
to accept a timeout parameter. Once you do that, all the other Popen
methods (which call wait
) will work as expected, including communicate
.
回答 24
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-subprocess2提供了子流程模块的扩展,使您可以等待一段时间,否则终止。
因此,要等待10秒钟才能终止进程,否则请终止:
pipe = subprocess.Popen('...')
timeout = 10
results = pipe.waitOrTerminate(timeout)
这与Windows和UNIX兼容。“结果”是一个字典,它包含“ returnCode”和“ actionTaken”,returnCode是应用程序的返回值(如果必须终止,则为None)。如果该过程正常完成,则显示为“ SUBPROCESS2_PROCESS_COMPLETED”,或者根据执行的操作显示“ SUBPROCESS2_PROCESS_TERMINATED”和SUBPROCESS2_PROCESS_KILLED的掩码(有关详细信息,请参阅文档)
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-subprocess2 provides extensions to the subprocess module which allow you to wait up to a certain period of time, otherwise terminate.
So, to wait up to 10 seconds for the process to terminate, otherwise kill:
pipe = subprocess.Popen('...')
timeout = 10
results = pipe.waitOrTerminate(timeout)
This is compatible with both windows and unix. “results” is a dictionary, it contains “returnCode” which is the return of the app (or None if it had to be killed), as well as “actionTaken”. which will be “SUBPROCESS2_PROCESS_COMPLETED” if the process completed normally, or a mask of “SUBPROCESS2_PROCESS_TERMINATED” and SUBPROCESS2_PROCESS_KILLED depending on action taken (see documentation for full details)
回答 25
对于python 2.6+,请使用gevent
from gevent.subprocess import Popen, PIPE, STDOUT
def call_sys(cmd, timeout):
p= Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=PIPE)
output, _ = p.communicate(timeout=timeout)
assert p.returncode == 0, p. returncode
return output
call_sys('./t.sh', 2)
# t.sh example
sleep 5
echo done
exit 1
for python 2.6+, use gevent
from gevent.subprocess import Popen, PIPE, STDOUT
def call_sys(cmd, timeout):
p= Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=PIPE)
output, _ = p.communicate(timeout=timeout)
assert p.returncode == 0, p. returncode
return output
call_sys('./t.sh', 2)
# t.sh example
sleep 5
echo done
exit 1
回答 26
python 2.7
import time
import subprocess
def run_command(cmd, timeout=0):
start_time = time.time()
df = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
while timeout and df.poll() == None:
if time.time()-start_time >= timeout:
df.kill()
return -1, ""
output = '\n'.join(df.communicate()).strip()
return df.returncode, output
python 2.7
import time
import subprocess
def run_command(cmd, timeout=0):
start_time = time.time()
df = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
while timeout and df.poll() == None:
if time.time()-start_time >= timeout:
df.kill()
return -1, ""
output = '\n'.join(df.communicate()).strip()
return df.returncode, output
回答 27
import subprocess, optparse, os, sys, re, datetime, threading, time, glob, shutil, xml.dom.minidom, traceback
class OutputManager:
def __init__(self, filename, mode, console, logonly):
self.con = console
self.logtoconsole = True
self.logtofile = False
if filename:
try:
self.f = open(filename, mode)
self.logtofile = True
if logonly == True:
self.logtoconsole = False
except IOError:
print (sys.exc_value)
print ("Switching to console only output...\n")
self.logtofile = False
self.logtoconsole = True
def write(self, data):
if self.logtoconsole == True:
self.con.write(data)
if self.logtofile == True:
self.f.write(data)
sys.stdout.flush()
def getTimeString():
return time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d", time.gmtime())
def runCommand(command):
'''
Execute a command in new thread and return the
stdout and stderr content of it.
'''
try:
Output = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True).communicate()[0]
except Exception as e:
print ("runCommand failed :%s" % (command))
print (str(e))
sys.stdout.flush()
return None
return Output
def GetOs():
Os = ""
if sys.platform.startswith('win32'):
Os = "win"
elif sys.platform.startswith('linux'):
Os = "linux"
elif sys.platform.startswith('darwin'):
Os = "mac"
return Os
def check_output(*popenargs, **kwargs):
try:
if 'stdout' in kwargs:
raise ValueError('stdout argument not allowed, it will be overridden.')
# Get start time.
startTime = datetime.datetime.now()
timeoutValue=3600
cmd = popenargs[0]
if sys.platform.startswith('win32'):
process = subprocess.Popen( cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True)
elif sys.platform.startswith('linux'):
process = subprocess.Popen( cmd , stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True )
elif sys.platform.startswith('darwin'):
process = subprocess.Popen( cmd , stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True )
stdoutdata, stderrdata = process.communicate( timeout = timeoutValue )
retcode = process.poll()
####################################
# Catch crash error and log it.
####################################
OutputHandle = None
try:
if retcode >= 1:
OutputHandle = OutputManager( 'CrashJob_' + getTimeString() + '.txt', 'a+', sys.stdout, False)
OutputHandle.write( cmd )
print (stdoutdata)
print (stderrdata)
sys.stdout.flush()
except Exception as e:
print (str(e))
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
####################################
# Catch time out error and log it.
####################################
Os = GetOs()
if Os == 'win':
killCmd = "taskkill /FI \"IMAGENAME eq {0}\" /T /F"
elif Os == 'linux':
killCmd = "pkill {0)"
elif Os == 'mac':
# Linux, Mac OS
killCmd = "killall -KILL {0}"
runCommand(killCmd.format("java"))
runCommand(killCmd.format("YouApp"))
OutputHandle = None
try:
OutputHandle = OutputManager( 'KillJob_' + getTimeString() + '.txt', 'a+', sys.stdout, False)
OutputHandle.write( cmd )
except Exception as e:
print (str(e))
except Exception as e:
for frame in traceback.extract_tb(sys.exc_info()[2]):
fname,lineno,fn,text = frame
print "Error in %s on line %d" % (fname, lineno)
import subprocess, optparse, os, sys, re, datetime, threading, time, glob, shutil, xml.dom.minidom, traceback
class OutputManager:
def __init__(self, filename, mode, console, logonly):
self.con = console
self.logtoconsole = True
self.logtofile = False
if filename:
try:
self.f = open(filename, mode)
self.logtofile = True
if logonly == True:
self.logtoconsole = False
except IOError:
print (sys.exc_value)
print ("Switching to console only output...\n")
self.logtofile = False
self.logtoconsole = True
def write(self, data):
if self.logtoconsole == True:
self.con.write(data)
if self.logtofile == True:
self.f.write(data)
sys.stdout.flush()
def getTimeString():
return time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d", time.gmtime())
def runCommand(command):
'''
Execute a command in new thread and return the
stdout and stderr content of it.
'''
try:
Output = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True).communicate()[0]
except Exception as e:
print ("runCommand failed :%s" % (command))
print (str(e))
sys.stdout.flush()
return None
return Output
def GetOs():
Os = ""
if sys.platform.startswith('win32'):
Os = "win"
elif sys.platform.startswith('linux'):
Os = "linux"
elif sys.platform.startswith('darwin'):
Os = "mac"
return Os
def check_output(*popenargs, **kwargs):
try:
if 'stdout' in kwargs:
raise ValueError('stdout argument not allowed, it will be overridden.')
# Get start time.
startTime = datetime.datetime.now()
timeoutValue=3600
cmd = popenargs[0]
if sys.platform.startswith('win32'):
process = subprocess.Popen( cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True)
elif sys.platform.startswith('linux'):
process = subprocess.Popen( cmd , stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True )
elif sys.platform.startswith('darwin'):
process = subprocess.Popen( cmd , stdout=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True )
stdoutdata, stderrdata = process.communicate( timeout = timeoutValue )
retcode = process.poll()
####################################
# Catch crash error and log it.
####################################
OutputHandle = None
try:
if retcode >= 1:
OutputHandle = OutputManager( 'CrashJob_' + getTimeString() + '.txt', 'a+', sys.stdout, False)
OutputHandle.write( cmd )
print (stdoutdata)
print (stderrdata)
sys.stdout.flush()
except Exception as e:
print (str(e))
except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
####################################
# Catch time out error and log it.
####################################
Os = GetOs()
if Os == 'win':
killCmd = "taskkill /FI \"IMAGENAME eq {0}\" /T /F"
elif Os == 'linux':
killCmd = "pkill {0)"
elif Os == 'mac':
# Linux, Mac OS
killCmd = "killall -KILL {0}"
runCommand(killCmd.format("java"))
runCommand(killCmd.format("YouApp"))
OutputHandle = None
try:
OutputHandle = OutputManager( 'KillJob_' + getTimeString() + '.txt', 'a+', sys.stdout, False)
OutputHandle.write( cmd )
except Exception as e:
print (str(e))
except Exception as e:
for frame in traceback.extract_tb(sys.exc_info()[2]):
fname,lineno,fn,text = frame
print "Error in %s on line %d" % (fname, lineno)
回答 28
只是想写一些简单的东西。
#!/usr/bin/python
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
import datetime
import time
popen = Popen(["/bin/sleep", "10"]);
pid = popen.pid
sttime = time.time();
waittime = 3
print "Start time %s"%(sttime)
while True:
popen.poll();
time.sleep(1)
rcode = popen.returncode
now = time.time();
if [ rcode is None ] and [ now > (sttime + waittime) ] :
print "Killing it now"
popen.kill()
Was just trying to write something simpler.
#!/usr/bin/python
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
import datetime
import time
popen = Popen(["/bin/sleep", "10"]);
pid = popen.pid
sttime = time.time();
waittime = 3
print "Start time %s"%(sttime)
while True:
popen.poll();
time.sleep(1)
rcode = popen.returncode
now = time.time();
if [ rcode is None ] and [ now > (sttime + waittime) ] :
print "Killing it now"
popen.kill()