最干净,最Pythonic的方式来获取明天的约会?

问题:最干净,最Pythonic的方式来获取明天的约会?

获取明天约会的最干净,最Python方式是什么?必须有比在一天中增加一天,在月末处理天等等的更好的方法。

What is the cleanest and most Pythonic way to get tomorrow’s date? There must be a better way than to add one to the day, handle days at the end of the month, etc.


回答 0

datetime.date.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=1) 应该可以

datetime.date.today() + datetime.timedelta(days=1) should do the trick


回答 1

timedelta 可以处理增加的天,秒,微秒,毫秒,分钟,小时或星期。

>>> import datetime
>>> today = datetime.date.today()
>>> today
datetime.date(2009, 10, 1)
>>> today + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
datetime.date(2009, 10, 2)
>>> datetime.date(2009,10,31) + datetime.timedelta(hours=24)
datetime.date(2009, 11, 1)

如评论中所问,leap日没有问题:

>>> datetime.date(2004, 2, 28) + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
datetime.date(2004, 2, 29)
>>> datetime.date(2004, 2, 28) + datetime.timedelta(days=2)
datetime.date(2004, 3, 1)
>>> datetime.date(2005, 2, 28) + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
datetime.date(2005, 3, 1)

timedelta can handle adding days, seconds, microseconds, milliseconds, minutes, hours, or weeks.

>>> import datetime
>>> today = datetime.date.today()
>>> today
datetime.date(2009, 10, 1)
>>> today + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
datetime.date(2009, 10, 2)
>>> datetime.date(2009,10,31) + datetime.timedelta(hours=24)
datetime.date(2009, 11, 1)

As asked in a comment, leap days pose no problem:

>>> datetime.date(2004, 2, 28) + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
datetime.date(2004, 2, 29)
>>> datetime.date(2004, 2, 28) + datetime.timedelta(days=2)
datetime.date(2004, 3, 1)
>>> datetime.date(2005, 2, 28) + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
datetime.date(2005, 3, 1)

回答 2

没有处理的闰秒寿:

>>> from datetime import datetime, timedelta
>>> dt = datetime(2008,12,31,23,59,59)
>>> str(dt)
'2008-12-31 23:59:59'
>>> # leap second was added at the end of 2008, 
>>> # adding one second should create a datetime
>>> # of '2008-12-31 23:59:60'
>>> str(dt+timedelta(0,1))
'2009-01-01 00:00:00'
>>> str(dt+timedelta(0,2))
'2009-01-01 00:00:01'

该死的

编辑-@Mark:文档说“是”,但是代码说“不是很多”:

>>> time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
(2008, 12, 31, 23, 59, 60, 2, 366, -1)
>>> time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"))
1230789600.0
>>> time.gmtime(time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")))
(2009, 1, 1, 6, 0, 0, 3, 1, 0)
>>> time.localtime(time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")))
(2009, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 3, 1, 0)

我认为gmtime或localtime将采用mktime返回的值,并以60秒为单位返回给我原始的元组。该测试表明这些leap秒会逐渐消失…

>>> a = time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"))
>>> b = time.mktime(time.strptime("2009-01-01 00:00:00","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"))
>>> a,b
(1230789600.0, 1230789600.0)
>>> b-a
0.0

No handling of leap seconds tho:

>>> from datetime import datetime, timedelta
>>> dt = datetime(2008,12,31,23,59,59)
>>> str(dt)
'2008-12-31 23:59:59'
>>> # leap second was added at the end of 2008, 
>>> # adding one second should create a datetime
>>> # of '2008-12-31 23:59:60'
>>> str(dt+timedelta(0,1))
'2009-01-01 00:00:00'
>>> str(dt+timedelta(0,2))
'2009-01-01 00:00:01'

darn.

EDIT – @Mark: The docs say “yes”, but the code says “not so much”:

>>> time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")
(2008, 12, 31, 23, 59, 60, 2, 366, -1)
>>> time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"))
1230789600.0
>>> time.gmtime(time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")))
(2009, 1, 1, 6, 0, 0, 3, 1, 0)
>>> time.localtime(time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")))
(2009, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 3, 1, 0)

I would think that gmtime or localtime would take the value returned by mktime and given me back the original tuple, with 60 as the number of seconds. And this test shows that these leap seconds can just fade away…

>>> a = time.mktime(time.strptime("2008-12-31 23:59:60","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"))
>>> b = time.mktime(time.strptime("2009-01-01 00:00:00","%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"))
>>> a,b
(1230789600.0, 1230789600.0)
>>> b-a
0.0

回答 3

即使是基本time模块也可以处理此问题:

import time
time.localtime(time.time() + 24*3600)

Even the basic time module can handle this:

import time
time.localtime(time.time() + 24*3600)