问题:在Python中获取大文件的MD5哈希

我使用过hashlib(在Python 2.6 / 3.0中取代了md5),如果我打开一个文件并将其内容放入hashlib.md5()函数中,它就可以正常工作。

问题在于非常大的文件,其大小可能超过RAM大小。

如何在不将整个文件加载到内存的情况下获取文件的MD5哈希?

I have used hashlib (which replaces md5 in Python 2.6/3.0) and it worked fine if I opened a file and put its content in hashlib.md5() function.

The problem is with very big files that their sizes could exceed RAM size.

How to get the MD5 hash of a file without loading the whole file to memory?


回答 0

将文件分成8192字节的块(或128字节的其他倍数),然后使用连续将其馈送到MD5 update()

这利用了MD5具有128字节摘要块(8192为128×64)这一事实。由于您没有将整个文件读入内存,因此占用的内存不会超过8192字节。

在Python 3.8+中,您可以执行

import hashlib
with open("your_filename.txt", "rb") as f:
    file_hash = hashlib.md5()
    while chunk := f.read(8192):
        file_hash.update(chunk)
print(file_hash.digest())
print(file_hash.hexdigest())  # to get a printable str instead of bytes

Break the file into 8192-byte chunks (or some other multiple of 128 bytes) and feed them to MD5 consecutively using update().

This takes advantage of the fact that MD5 has 128-byte digest blocks (8192 is 128×64). Since you’re not reading the entire file into memory, this won’t use much more than 8192 bytes of memory.

In Python 3.8+ you can do

import hashlib
with open("your_filename.txt", "rb") as f:
    file_hash = hashlib.md5()
    while chunk := f.read(8192):
        file_hash.update(chunk)
print(file_hash.digest())
print(file_hash.hexdigest())  # to get a printable str instead of bytes

回答 1

您需要以适当大小的块读取文件:

def md5_for_file(f, block_size=2**20):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    while True:
        data = f.read(block_size)
        if not data:
            break
        md5.update(data)
    return md5.digest()

注意:请确保您打开文件时以’rb’开头-否则您将得到错误的结果。

因此,使用一种方法来完成全部工作-使用类似以下内容的方法:

def generate_file_md5(rootdir, filename, blocksize=2**20):
    m = hashlib.md5()
    with open( os.path.join(rootdir, filename) , "rb" ) as f:
        while True:
            buf = f.read(blocksize)
            if not buf:
                break
            m.update( buf )
    return m.hexdigest()

上面的更新基于Frerich Raabe提供的评论-我对此进行了测试,发现在我的Python 2.7.2 Windows安装中它是正确的

我使用“ jacksum”工具对结果进行了交叉检查。

jacksum -a md5 <filename>

http://www.jonelo.de/java/jacksum/

You need to read the file in chunks of suitable size:

def md5_for_file(f, block_size=2**20):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    while True:
        data = f.read(block_size)
        if not data:
            break
        md5.update(data)
    return md5.digest()

NOTE: Make sure you open your file with the ‘rb’ to the open – otherwise you will get the wrong result.

So to do the whole lot in one method – use something like:

def generate_file_md5(rootdir, filename, blocksize=2**20):
    m = hashlib.md5()
    with open( os.path.join(rootdir, filename) , "rb" ) as f:
        while True:
            buf = f.read(blocksize)
            if not buf:
                break
            m.update( buf )
    return m.hexdigest()

The update above was based on the comments provided by Frerich Raabe – and I tested this and found it to be correct on my Python 2.7.2 windows installation

I cross-checked the results using the ‘jacksum’ tool.

jacksum -a md5 <filename>

http://www.jonelo.de/java/jacksum/


回答 2

下面,我结合了评论中的建议。谢谢大家!

python <3.7

import hashlib

def checksum(filename, hash_factory=hashlib.md5, chunk_num_blocks=128):
    h = hash_factory()
    with open(filename,'rb') as f: 
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(chunk_num_blocks*h.block_size), b''): 
            h.update(chunk)
    return h.digest()

python 3.8及以上

import hashlib

def checksum(filename, hash_factory=hashlib.md5, chunk_num_blocks=128):
    h = hash_factory()
    with open(filename,'rb') as f: 
        while chunk := f.read(chunk_num_blocks*h.block_size): 
            h.update(chunk)
    return h.digest()

原始帖子

如果您更关心使用pythonic(无“ while为True”)读取文件的方式,请检查以下代码:

import hashlib

def checksum_md5(filename):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with open(filename,'rb') as f: 
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(8192), b''): 
            md5.update(chunk)
    return md5.digest()

请注意,iter()函数需要一个空字节字符串来使返回的迭代器在EOF处停止,因为read()返回b”(而不仅仅是“)。

Below I’ve incorporated suggestion from comments. Thank you al!

python < 3.7

import hashlib

def checksum(filename, hash_factory=hashlib.md5, chunk_num_blocks=128):
    h = hash_factory()
    with open(filename,'rb') as f: 
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(chunk_num_blocks*h.block_size), b''): 
            h.update(chunk)
    return h.digest()

python 3.8 and above

import hashlib

def checksum(filename, hash_factory=hashlib.md5, chunk_num_blocks=128):
    h = hash_factory()
    with open(filename,'rb') as f: 
        while chunk := f.read(chunk_num_blocks*h.block_size): 
            h.update(chunk)
    return h.digest()

original post

if you care about more pythonic (no ‘while True’) way of reading the file check this code:

import hashlib

def checksum_md5(filename):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with open(filename,'rb') as f: 
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(8192), b''): 
            md5.update(chunk)
    return md5.digest()

Note that the iter() func needs an empty byte string for the returned iterator to halt at EOF, since read() returns b” (not just ”).


回答 3

这是我@Piotr Czapla方法的版本:

def md5sum(filename):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with open(filename, 'rb') as f:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(128 * md5.block_size), b''):
            md5.update(chunk)
    return md5.hexdigest()

Here’s my version of @Piotr Czapla’s method:

def md5sum(filename):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with open(filename, 'rb') as f:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(128 * md5.block_size), b''):
            md5.update(chunk)
    return md5.hexdigest()

回答 4

在此线程中使用多个评论/答案,这是我的解决方案:

import hashlib
def md5_for_file(path, block_size=256*128, hr=False):
    '''
    Block size directly depends on the block size of your filesystem
    to avoid performances issues
    Here I have blocks of 4096 octets (Default NTFS)
    '''
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with open(path,'rb') as f: 
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(block_size), b''): 
             md5.update(chunk)
    if hr:
        return md5.hexdigest()
    return md5.digest()
  • 这是“ pythonic”
  • 这是一个功能
  • 它避免了隐式的值:总是喜欢显式的值。
  • 它允许(非常重要)性能优化

最后,

-这是由社区建立的,感谢大家的建议/想法。

Using multiple comment/answers in this thread, here is my solution :

import hashlib
def md5_for_file(path, block_size=256*128, hr=False):
    '''
    Block size directly depends on the block size of your filesystem
    to avoid performances issues
    Here I have blocks of 4096 octets (Default NTFS)
    '''
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with open(path,'rb') as f: 
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(block_size), b''): 
             md5.update(chunk)
    if hr:
        return md5.hexdigest()
    return md5.digest()
  • This is “pythonic”
  • This is a function
  • It avoids implicit values: always prefer explicit ones.
  • It allows (very important) performances optimizations

And finally,

– This has been built by a community, thanks all for your advices/ideas.


回答 5

Python 2/3便携式解决方案

要计算校验和(md5,sha1等),您必须以二进制模式打开文件,因为您将对字节值求和:

要实现py27 / py3的可移植性,您应该使用以下io软件包:

import hashlib
import io


def md5sum(src):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with io.open(src, mode="rb") as fd:
        content = fd.read()
        md5.update(content)
    return md5

如果文件很大,您可能希望按块读取文件,以避免将整个文件内容存储在内存中:

def md5sum(src, length=io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with io.open(src, mode="rb") as fd:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: fd.read(length), b''):
            md5.update(chunk)
    return md5

这里的技巧是将iter()函数与前哨(空字符串)一起使用。

在这种情况下创建的迭代器将调用o [lambda函数],且每次对其next()方法的调用都没有参数;如果返回的值等于哨兵,StopIteration将被提高,否则将返回该值。

如果你的文件是真的大了,你可能还需要显示进度信息。您可以通过调用一个回调函数来做到这一点,该函数打印或记录所计算的字节数:

def md5sum(src, callback, length=io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE):
    calculated = 0
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with io.open(src, mode="rb") as fd:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: fd.read(length), b''):
            md5.update(chunk)
            calculated += len(chunk)
            callback(calculated)
    return md5

A Python 2/3 portable solution

To calculate a checksum (md5, sha1, etc.), you must open the file in binary mode, because you’ll sum bytes values:

To be py27/py3 portable, you ought to use the io packages, like this:

import hashlib
import io


def md5sum(src):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with io.open(src, mode="rb") as fd:
        content = fd.read()
        md5.update(content)
    return md5

If your files are big, you may prefer to read the file by chunks to avoid storing the whole file content in memory:

def md5sum(src, length=io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE):
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with io.open(src, mode="rb") as fd:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: fd.read(length), b''):
            md5.update(chunk)
    return md5

The trick here is to use the iter() function with a sentinel (the empty string).

The iterator created in this case will call o [the lambda function] with no arguments for each call to its next() method; if the value returned is equal to sentinel, StopIteration will be raised, otherwise the value will be returned.

If your files are really big, you may also need to display progress information. You can do that by calling a callback function which prints or logs the amount of calculated bytes:

def md5sum(src, callback, length=io.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE):
    calculated = 0
    md5 = hashlib.md5()
    with io.open(src, mode="rb") as fd:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: fd.read(length), b''):
            md5.update(chunk)
            calculated += len(chunk)
            callback(calculated)
    return md5

回答 6

混合了Bastien Semene代码,将Hawkwing关于通用哈希函数的注释纳入考虑…

def hash_for_file(path, algorithm=hashlib.algorithms[0], block_size=256*128, human_readable=True):
    """
    Block size directly depends on the block size of your filesystem
    to avoid performances issues
    Here I have blocks of 4096 octets (Default NTFS)

    Linux Ext4 block size
    sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sda5 | grep -i 'block size'
    > Block size:               4096

    Input:
        path: a path
        algorithm: an algorithm in hashlib.algorithms
                   ATM: ('md5', 'sha1', 'sha224', 'sha256', 'sha384', 'sha512')
        block_size: a multiple of 128 corresponding to the block size of your filesystem
        human_readable: switch between digest() or hexdigest() output, default hexdigest()
    Output:
        hash
    """
    if algorithm not in hashlib.algorithms:
        raise NameError('The algorithm "{algorithm}" you specified is '
                        'not a member of "hashlib.algorithms"'.format(algorithm=algorithm))

    hash_algo = hashlib.new(algorithm)  # According to hashlib documentation using new()
                                        # will be slower then calling using named
                                        # constructors, ex.: hashlib.md5()
    with open(path, 'rb') as f:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(block_size), b''):
             hash_algo.update(chunk)
    if human_readable:
        file_hash = hash_algo.hexdigest()
    else:
        file_hash = hash_algo.digest()
    return file_hash

A remix of Bastien Semene code that take Hawkwing comment about generic hashing function into consideration…

def hash_for_file(path, algorithm=hashlib.algorithms[0], block_size=256*128, human_readable=True):
    """
    Block size directly depends on the block size of your filesystem
    to avoid performances issues
    Here I have blocks of 4096 octets (Default NTFS)

    Linux Ext4 block size
    sudo tune2fs -l /dev/sda5 | grep -i 'block size'
    > Block size:               4096

    Input:
        path: a path
        algorithm: an algorithm in hashlib.algorithms
                   ATM: ('md5', 'sha1', 'sha224', 'sha256', 'sha384', 'sha512')
        block_size: a multiple of 128 corresponding to the block size of your filesystem
        human_readable: switch between digest() or hexdigest() output, default hexdigest()
    Output:
        hash
    """
    if algorithm not in hashlib.algorithms:
        raise NameError('The algorithm "{algorithm}" you specified is '
                        'not a member of "hashlib.algorithms"'.format(algorithm=algorithm))

    hash_algo = hashlib.new(algorithm)  # According to hashlib documentation using new()
                                        # will be slower then calling using named
                                        # constructors, ex.: hashlib.md5()
    with open(path, 'rb') as f:
        for chunk in iter(lambda: f.read(block_size), b''):
             hash_algo.update(chunk)
    if human_readable:
        file_hash = hash_algo.hexdigest()
    else:
        file_hash = hash_algo.digest()
    return file_hash

回答 7

如果不阅读全部内容,您将无法获得md5。但是您可以使用更新功能逐块读取文件内容。
m.update(a); m.update(b)等同于m.update(a + b)

u can’t get it’s md5 without read full content. but u can use update function to read the files content block by block.
m.update(a); m.update(b) is equivalent to m.update(a+b)


回答 8

我认为以下代码更像pythonic:

from hashlib import md5

def get_md5(fname):
    m = md5()
    with open(fname, 'rb') as fp:
        for chunk in fp:
            m.update(chunk)
    return m.hexdigest()

I think the following code is more pythonic:

from hashlib import md5

def get_md5(fname):
    m = md5()
    with open(fname, 'rb') as fp:
        for chunk in fp:
            m.update(chunk)
    return m.hexdigest()

回答 9

Django可接受答案的实现:

import hashlib
from django.db import models


class MyModel(models.Model):
    file = models.FileField()  # any field based on django.core.files.File

    def get_hash(self):
        hash = hashlib.md5()
        for chunk in self.file.chunks(chunk_size=8192):
            hash.update(chunk)
        return hash.hexdigest()

Implementation of accepted answer for Django:

import hashlib
from django.db import models


class MyModel(models.Model):
    file = models.FileField()  # any field based on django.core.files.File

    def get_hash(self):
        hash = hashlib.md5()
        for chunk in self.file.chunks(chunk_size=8192):
            hash.update(chunk)
        return hash.hexdigest()

回答 10

我不喜欢循环。基于@Nathan Feger:

md5 = hashlib.md5()
with open(filename, 'rb') as f:
    functools.reduce(lambda _, c: md5.update(c), iter(lambda: f.read(md5.block_size * 128), b''), None)
md5.hexdigest()

I don’t like loops. Based on @Nathan Feger:

md5 = hashlib.md5()
with open(filename, 'rb') as f:
    functools.reduce(lambda _, c: md5.update(c), iter(lambda: f.read(md5.block_size * 128), b''), None)
md5.hexdigest()

回答 11

import hashlib,re
opened = open('/home/parrot/pass.txt','r')
opened = open.readlines()
for i in opened:
    strip1 = i.strip('\n')
    hash_object = hashlib.md5(strip1.encode())
    hash2 = hash_object.hexdigest()
    print hash2
import hashlib,re
opened = open('/home/parrot/pass.txt','r')
opened = open.readlines()
for i in opened:
    strip1 = i.strip('\n')
    hash_object = hashlib.md5(strip1.encode())
    hash2 = hash_object.hexdigest()
    print hash2

回答 12

我不确定这里是否有太多大惊小怪的事情。我最近在md5上遇到问题,并且在MySQL上将这些文件存储为blob,因此我尝试了各种文件大小和简单的Python方法,即:

FileHash=hashlib.md5(FileData).hexdigest()

在文件大小为2Kb到20Mb的范围内,我无法检测到明显的性能差异,因此无需“分块”哈希。无论如何,如果Linux必须使用磁盘,那么它至少可以做到与普通程序员阻止磁盘使用的能力相同。碰巧,问题与md5无关。如果您使用的是MySQL,请不要忘记已经存在md5()和sha1()函数。

I’m not sure that there isn’t a bit too much fussing around here. I recently had problems with md5 and files stored as blobs on MySQL so I experimented with various file sizes and the straightforward Python approach, viz:

FileHash=hashlib.md5(FileData).hexdigest()

I could detect no noticeable performance difference with a range of file sizes 2Kb to 20Mb and therefore no need to ‘chunk’ the hashing. Anyway, if Linux has to go to disk, it will probably do it at least as well as the average programmer’s ability to keep it from doing so. As it happened, the problem was nothing to do with md5. If you’re using MySQL, don’t forget the md5() and sha1() functions already there.


声明:本站所有文章,如无特殊说明或标注,均为本站原创发布。任何个人或组织,在未征得本站同意时,禁止复制、盗用、采集、发布本站内容到任何网站、书籍等各类媒体平台。如若本站内容侵犯了原著者的合法权益,可联系我们进行处理。