问题:是否有一个内置的numpy来拒绝列表中的离群值

是否有内置的numpy来执行以下操作?也就是说,获取一个列表d并返回一个列表,filtered_d其中根据中假定的点的某些分布,删除了所有外围元素d

import numpy as np

def reject_outliers(data):
    m = 2
    u = np.mean(data)
    s = np.std(data)
    filtered = [e for e in data if (u - 2 * s < e < u + 2 * s)]
    return filtered

>>> d = [2,4,5,1,6,5,40]
>>> filtered_d = reject_outliers(d)
>>> print filtered_d
[2,4,5,1,6,5]

我之所以说“类似”,是因为该函数可能允许变化的分布(泊松,高斯等)和这些分布内的异常阈值(如m我在这里使用的)。

Is there a numpy builtin to do something like the following? That is, take a list d and return a list filtered_d with any outlying elements removed based on some assumed distribution of the points in d.

import numpy as np

def reject_outliers(data):
    m = 2
    u = np.mean(data)
    s = np.std(data)
    filtered = [e for e in data if (u - 2 * s < e < u + 2 * s)]
    return filtered

>>> d = [2,4,5,1,6,5,40]
>>> filtered_d = reject_outliers(d)
>>> print filtered_d
[2,4,5,1,6,5]

I say ‘something like’ because the function might allow for varying distributions (poisson, gaussian, etc.) and varying outlier thresholds within those distributions (like the m I’ve used here).


回答 0

此方法与您的方法几乎相同,只是更多的numpyst(也适用于numpy数组):

def reject_outliers(data, m=2):
    return data[abs(data - np.mean(data)) < m * np.std(data)]

This method is almost identical to yours, just more numpyst (also working on numpy arrays only):

def reject_outliers(data, m=2):
    return data[abs(data - np.mean(data)) < m * np.std(data)]

回答 1

处理离群值时,重要的一点是应尝试使用估计值尽可能可靠。分布的平均值将受到异常值的影响,但例如中位数会小得多。

以eumiro的答案为基础:

def reject_outliers(data, m = 2.):
    d = np.abs(data - np.median(data))
    mdev = np.median(d)
    s = d/mdev if mdev else 0.
    return data[s<m]

在这里,我用更可靠的中位数代替了均值,并用中位数与中位数的绝对距离代替了标准偏差。然后,我用距离(再次)的中值来缩放距离,以使其m处于合理的相对范围内。

请注意,要使data[s<m]语法起作用,data必须是一个numpy数组。

Something important when dealing with outliers is that one should try to use estimators as robust as possible. The mean of a distribution will be biased by outliers but e.g. the median will be much less.

Building on eumiro’s answer:

def reject_outliers(data, m = 2.):
    d = np.abs(data - np.median(data))
    mdev = np.median(d)
    s = d/mdev if mdev else 0.
    return data[s<m]

Here I have replace the mean with the more robust median and the standard deviation with the median absolute distance to the median. I then scaled the distances by their (again) median value so that m is on a reasonable relative scale.

Note that for the data[s<m] syntax to work, data must be a numpy array.


回答 2

本杰明·班尼尔(Benjamin Bannier)的答案会在距离中位数的距离中位数为0时产生直通,因此我发现此修改版本对下面示例中给出的情况更有帮助。

def reject_outliers_2(data, m=2.):
    d = np.abs(data - np.median(data))
    mdev = np.median(d)
    s = d / (mdev if mdev else 1.)
    return data[s < m]

例:

data_points = np.array([10, 10, 10, 17, 10, 10])
print(reject_outliers(data_points))
print(reject_outliers_2(data_points))

给出:

[[10, 10, 10, 17, 10, 10]]  # 17 is not filtered
[10, 10, 10, 10, 10]  # 17 is filtered (it's distance, 7, is greater than m)

Benjamin Bannier’s answer yields a pass-through when the median of distances from the median is 0, so I found this modified version a bit more helpful for cases as given in the example below.

def reject_outliers_2(data, m=2.):
    d = np.abs(data - np.median(data))
    mdev = np.median(d)
    s = d / (mdev if mdev else 1.)
    return data[s < m]

Example:

data_points = np.array([10, 10, 10, 17, 10, 10])
print(reject_outliers(data_points))
print(reject_outliers_2(data_points))

Gives:

[[10, 10, 10, 17, 10, 10]]  # 17 is not filtered
[10, 10, 10, 10, 10]  # 17 is filtered (it's distance, 7, is greater than m)

回答 3

在Benjamin的基础上,使用pandas.Series,并用IQR替换MAD

def reject_outliers(sr, iq_range=0.5):
    pcnt = (1 - iq_range) / 2
    qlow, median, qhigh = sr.dropna().quantile([pcnt, 0.50, 1-pcnt])
    iqr = qhigh - qlow
    return sr[ (sr - median).abs() <= iqr]

例如,如果设置iq_range=0.6,则四分位数范围的百分位数将变为:0.20 <--> 0.80,因此将包含更多离群值。

Building on Benjamin’s, using pandas.Series, and replacing MAD with IQR:

def reject_outliers(sr, iq_range=0.5):
    pcnt = (1 - iq_range) / 2
    qlow, median, qhigh = sr.dropna().quantile([pcnt, 0.50, 1-pcnt])
    iqr = qhigh - qlow
    return sr[ (sr - median).abs() <= iqr]

For instance, if you set iq_range=0.6, the percentiles of the interquartile-range would become: 0.20 <--> 0.80, so more outliers will be included.


回答 4

另一种方法是对标准偏差进行可靠的估计(假设高斯统计量)。查找在线计算器,我发现90%的百分位数对应于1.2815σ,而95%的百分位数是1.645σ(http://vassarstats.net/tabs.html?#z

作为一个简单的例子:

import numpy as np

# Create some random numbers
x = np.random.normal(5, 2, 1000)

# Calculate the statistics
print("Mean= ", np.mean(x))
print("Median= ", np.median(x))
print("Max/Min=", x.max(), " ", x.min())
print("StdDev=", np.std(x))
print("90th Percentile", np.percentile(x, 90))

# Add a few large points
x[10] += 1000
x[20] += 2000
x[30] += 1500

# Recalculate the statistics
print()
print("Mean= ", np.mean(x))
print("Median= ", np.median(x))
print("Max/Min=", x.max(), " ", x.min())
print("StdDev=", np.std(x))
print("90th Percentile", np.percentile(x, 90))

# Measure the percentile intervals and then estimate Standard Deviation of the distribution, both from median to the 90th percentile and from the 10th to 90th percentile
p90 = np.percentile(x, 90)
p10 = np.percentile(x, 10)
p50 = np.median(x)
# p50 to p90 is 1.2815 sigma
rSig = (p90-p50)/1.2815
print("Robust Sigma=", rSig)

rSig = (p90-p10)/(2*1.2815)
print("Robust Sigma=", rSig)

我得到的输出是:

Mean=  4.99760520022
Median=  4.95395274981
Max/Min= 11.1226494654   -2.15388472011
Sigma= 1.976629928
90th Percentile 7.52065379649

Mean=  9.64760520022
Median=  4.95667658782
Max/Min= 2205.43861943   -2.15388472011
Sigma= 88.6263902244
90th Percentile 7.60646688694

Robust Sigma= 2.06772555531
Robust Sigma= 1.99878292462

接近预期值2。

如果要删除高于/低于5个标准偏差的点(对于1000个点,我们期望1个值> 3个标准偏差):

y = x[abs(x - p50) < rSig*5]

# Print the statistics again
print("Mean= ", np.mean(y))
print("Median= ", np.median(y))
print("Max/Min=", y.max(), " ", y.min())
print("StdDev=", np.std(y))

这使:

Mean=  4.99755359935
Median=  4.95213030447
Max/Min= 11.1226494654   -2.15388472011
StdDev= 1.97692712883

我不知道哪种方法更有效/更健壮

An alternative is to make a robust estimation of the standard deviation (assuming Gaussian statistics). Looking up online calculators, I see that the 90% percentile corresponds to 1.2815σ and the 95% is 1.645σ (http://vassarstats.net/tabs.html?#z)

As a simple example:

import numpy as np

# Create some random numbers
x = np.random.normal(5, 2, 1000)

# Calculate the statistics
print("Mean= ", np.mean(x))
print("Median= ", np.median(x))
print("Max/Min=", x.max(), " ", x.min())
print("StdDev=", np.std(x))
print("90th Percentile", np.percentile(x, 90))

# Add a few large points
x[10] += 1000
x[20] += 2000
x[30] += 1500

# Recalculate the statistics
print()
print("Mean= ", np.mean(x))
print("Median= ", np.median(x))
print("Max/Min=", x.max(), " ", x.min())
print("StdDev=", np.std(x))
print("90th Percentile", np.percentile(x, 90))

# Measure the percentile intervals and then estimate Standard Deviation of the distribution, both from median to the 90th percentile and from the 10th to 90th percentile
p90 = np.percentile(x, 90)
p10 = np.percentile(x, 10)
p50 = np.median(x)
# p50 to p90 is 1.2815 sigma
rSig = (p90-p50)/1.2815
print("Robust Sigma=", rSig)

rSig = (p90-p10)/(2*1.2815)
print("Robust Sigma=", rSig)

The output I get is:

Mean=  4.99760520022
Median=  4.95395274981
Max/Min= 11.1226494654   -2.15388472011
Sigma= 1.976629928
90th Percentile 7.52065379649

Mean=  9.64760520022
Median=  4.95667658782
Max/Min= 2205.43861943   -2.15388472011
Sigma= 88.6263902244
90th Percentile 7.60646688694

Robust Sigma= 2.06772555531
Robust Sigma= 1.99878292462

Which is close to the expected value of 2.

If we want to remove points above/below 5 standard deviations (with 1000 points we would expect 1 value > 3 standard deviations):

y = x[abs(x - p50) < rSig*5]

# Print the statistics again
print("Mean= ", np.mean(y))
print("Median= ", np.median(y))
print("Max/Min=", y.max(), " ", y.min())
print("StdDev=", np.std(y))

Which gives:

Mean=  4.99755359935
Median=  4.95213030447
Max/Min= 11.1226494654   -2.15388472011
StdDev= 1.97692712883

I have no idea which approach is the more efficent/robust


回答 5

我想在此答案中提供两种方法,基于“ z分数”的解决方案和基于“ IQR”的解决方案。

此答案中提供的代码适用于单个暗numpy数组和多个numpy数组。

让我们首先导入一些模块。

import collections
import numpy as np
import scipy.stats as stat
from scipy.stats import iqr

基于z评分的方法

此方法将测试数字是否超出三个标准偏差。根据此规则,如果值离群,则该方法将返回true,否则返回false。

def sd_outlier(x, axis = None, bar = 3, side = 'both'):
    assert side in ['gt', 'lt', 'both'], 'Side should be `gt`, `lt` or `both`.'

    d_z = stat.zscore(x, axis = axis)

    if side == 'gt':
        return d_z > bar
    elif side == 'lt':
        return d_z < -bar
    elif side == 'both':
        return np.abs(d_z) > bar

基于IQR的方法

此方法将测试值是否小于q1 - 1.5 * iqr或大于q3 + 1.5 * iqr,这与SPSS的plot方法类似。

def q1(x, axis = None):
    return np.percentile(x, 25, axis = axis)

def q3(x, axis = None):
    return np.percentile(x, 75, axis = axis)

def iqr_outlier(x, axis = None, bar = 1.5, side = 'both'):
    assert side in ['gt', 'lt', 'both'], 'Side should be `gt`, `lt` or `both`.'

    d_iqr = iqr(x, axis = axis)
    d_q1 = q1(x, axis = axis)
    d_q3 = q3(x, axis = axis)
    iqr_distance = np.multiply(d_iqr, bar)

    stat_shape = list(x.shape)

    if isinstance(axis, collections.Iterable):
        for single_axis in axis:
            stat_shape[single_axis] = 1
    else:
        stat_shape[axis] = 1

    if side in ['gt', 'both']:
        upper_range = d_q3 + iqr_distance
        upper_outlier = np.greater(x - upper_range.reshape(stat_shape), 0)
    if side in ['lt', 'both']:
        lower_range = d_q1 - iqr_distance
        lower_outlier = np.less(x - lower_range.reshape(stat_shape), 0)

    if side == 'gt':
        return upper_outlier
    if side == 'lt':
        return lower_outlier
    if side == 'both':
        return np.logical_or(upper_outlier, lower_outlier)

最后,如果要滤除异常值,请使用numpy选择器。

祝你今天愉快。

I would like to provide two methods in this answer, solution based on “z score” and solution based on “IQR”.

The code provided in this answer works on both single dim numpy array and multiple numpy array.

Let’s import some modules firstly.

import collections
import numpy as np
import scipy.stats as stat
from scipy.stats import iqr

z score based method

This method will test if the number falls outside the three standard deviations. Based on this rule, if the value is outlier, the method will return true, if not, return false.

def sd_outlier(x, axis = None, bar = 3, side = 'both'):
    assert side in ['gt', 'lt', 'both'], 'Side should be `gt`, `lt` or `both`.'

    d_z = stat.zscore(x, axis = axis)

    if side == 'gt':
        return d_z > bar
    elif side == 'lt':
        return d_z < -bar
    elif side == 'both':
        return np.abs(d_z) > bar

IQR based method

This method will test if the value is less than q1 - 1.5 * iqr or greater than q3 + 1.5 * iqr, which is similar to SPSS’s plot method.

def q1(x, axis = None):
    return np.percentile(x, 25, axis = axis)

def q3(x, axis = None):
    return np.percentile(x, 75, axis = axis)

def iqr_outlier(x, axis = None, bar = 1.5, side = 'both'):
    assert side in ['gt', 'lt', 'both'], 'Side should be `gt`, `lt` or `both`.'

    d_iqr = iqr(x, axis = axis)
    d_q1 = q1(x, axis = axis)
    d_q3 = q3(x, axis = axis)
    iqr_distance = np.multiply(d_iqr, bar)

    stat_shape = list(x.shape)

    if isinstance(axis, collections.Iterable):
        for single_axis in axis:
            stat_shape[single_axis] = 1
    else:
        stat_shape[axis] = 1

    if side in ['gt', 'both']:
        upper_range = d_q3 + iqr_distance
        upper_outlier = np.greater(x - upper_range.reshape(stat_shape), 0)
    if side in ['lt', 'both']:
        lower_range = d_q1 - iqr_distance
        lower_outlier = np.less(x - lower_range.reshape(stat_shape), 0)

    if side == 'gt':
        return upper_outlier
    if side == 'lt':
        return lower_outlier
    if side == 'both':
        return np.logical_or(upper_outlier, lower_outlier)

Finally, if you want to filter out the outliers, use a numpy selector.

Have a nice day.


回答 6

考虑到当您的标准偏差由于巨大的异常值而变得非常大时,上述所有方法都会失败。

Simalar的平均值计算失败,应该计算中位数。尽管如此,平均值“更容易出现stdDv这样的错误”。

您可以尝试迭代应用算法,也可以使用四分位数范围进行过滤:(此处“因数”与*范围有关,但仅当数据遵循高斯分布时)

import numpy as np

def sortoutOutliers(dataIn,factor):
    quant3, quant1 = np.percentile(dataIn, [75 ,25])
    iqr = quant3 - quant1
    iqrSigma = iqr/1.34896
    medData = np.median(dataIn)
    dataOut = [ x for x in dataIn if ( (x > medData - factor* iqrSigma) and (x < medData + factor* iqrSigma) ) ] 
    return(dataOut)

Consider that all the above methods fail when your standard deviation gets very large due to huge outliers.

(Simalar as the average caluclation fails and should rather caluclate the median. Though, the average is “more prone to such an error as the stdDv”.)

You could try to iteratively apply your algorithm or you filter using the interquartile range: (here “factor” relates to a n*sigma range, yet only when your data follows a Gaussian distribution)

import numpy as np

def sortoutOutliers(dataIn,factor):
    quant3, quant1 = np.percentile(dataIn, [75 ,25])
    iqr = quant3 - quant1
    iqrSigma = iqr/1.34896
    medData = np.median(dataIn)
    dataOut = [ x for x in dataIn if ( (x > medData - factor* iqrSigma) and (x < medData + factor* iqrSigma) ) ] 
    return(dataOut)

回答 7

我想做类似的事情,除了将数字设置为NaN而不是从数据中删除它,因为如果删除它,则更改了会弄乱绘图的长度(即,如果您仅从表的一列中删除异常值) ,但您需要使其与其他列保持相同,以便可以相互绘制图)。

为此,我使用了numpy的masking函数

def reject_outliers(data, m=2):
    stdev = np.std(data)
    mean = np.mean(data)
    maskMin = mean - stdev * m
    maskMax = mean + stdev * m
    mask = np.ma.masked_outside(data, maskMin, maskMax)
    print('Masking values outside of {} and {}'.format(maskMin, maskMax))
    return mask

I wanted to do something similar, except setting the number to NaN rather than removing it from the data, since if you remove it you change the length which can mess up plotting (i.e. if you’re only removing outliers from one column in a table, but you need it to remain the same as the other columns so you can plot them against each other).

To do so I used numpy’s masking functions:

def reject_outliers(data, m=2):
    stdev = np.std(data)
    mean = np.mean(data)
    maskMin = mean - stdev * m
    maskMax = mean + stdev * m
    mask = np.ma.masked_outside(data, maskMin, maskMax)
    print('Masking values outside of {} and {}'.format(maskMin, maskMax))
    return mask

回答 8

如果要获取离群值的索引位置,idx_list则将其返回。

def reject_outliers(data, m = 2.):
        d = np.abs(data - np.median(data))
        mdev = np.median(d)
        s = d/mdev if mdev else 0.
        data_range = np.arange(len(data))
        idx_list = data_range[s>=m]
        return data[s<m], idx_list

data_points = np.array([8, 10, 35, 17, 73, 77])  
print(reject_outliers(data_points))

after rejection: [ 8 10 35 17], index positions of outliers: [4 5]

if you want to get the index position of the outliers idx_list will return it.

def reject_outliers(data, m = 2.):
        d = np.abs(data - np.median(data))
        mdev = np.median(d)
        s = d/mdev if mdev else 0.
        data_range = np.arange(len(data))
        idx_list = data_range[s>=m]
        return data[s<m], idx_list

data_points = np.array([8, 10, 35, 17, 73, 77])  
print(reject_outliers(data_points))

after rejection: [ 8 10 35 17], index positions of outliers: [4 5]

回答 9

对于一组图像(每个图像都有3维),我想拒绝使用的每个像素的离群值:

mean = np.mean(imgs, axis=0)
std = np.std(imgs, axis=0)
mask = np.greater(0.5 * std + 1, np.abs(imgs - mean))
masked = np.multiply(imgs, mask)

然后可以计算平均值:

masked_mean = np.divide(np.sum(masked, axis=0), np.sum(mask, axis=0))

(我将其用于背景减法)

For a set of images (each image has 3 dimensions), where I wanted to reject outliers for each pixel I used:

mean = np.mean(imgs, axis=0)
std = np.std(imgs, axis=0)
mask = np.greater(0.5 * std + 1, np.abs(imgs - mean))
masked = np.multiply(imgs, mask)

Then it is possible to compute the mean:

masked_mean = np.divide(np.sum(masked, axis=0), np.sum(mask, axis=0))

(I use it for Background Subtraction)


声明:本站所有文章,如无特殊说明或标注,均为本站原创发布。任何个人或组织,在未征得本站同意时,禁止复制、盗用、采集、发布本站内容到任何网站、书籍等各类媒体平台。如若本站内容侵犯了原著者的合法权益,可联系我们进行处理。